Translation and Reliability of FAAM-U

NCT05997797 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: IRB- UOL-FAHS/810-XXII/2021
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 175
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study is designed to translate and validate the FAAM questionnaire to the Urdu language, to interpret its psychometric properties, and to determine the reliability of scores obtained from the population of Pakistan. The translated version of the gold standard tool will be used by the local population as well as Urdu-speaking immigrants across the globe to better understand and report the severity of their symptoms. Hence, to improve quality of life across cultures, there is a need of standard outcome measures in Urdu language.

Conditions

Foot Injuries; Ankle Injuries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• FAAM-U

  The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale

  72 Hours

Study Arms (1)

Single Group

A total of 175 patients with a range of foot or ankle problems were included for the review. Informed consent was taken from the review members in written form. They all finished the Urdu version of FAAM in the test session. With a time, span of 3 days after the primary recording, a total of the 175 patients whose conditions were relied upon to stay stable were approached to complete the forms again in the retest meeting; no treatment was given during this time-frame. The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually. Also, toward the finish of the structure, patients were approached to rate the current degree of function with a 4-point Likert scale. Patients evaluated everything as indicated by the trouble they go over with each undertaking on account of their foot or ankle condition. After assortment, information was saved in a safe spot to keep away from any dispositions.

Other: FAAM

Interventions

FAAM OTHER

The FAAM is made out of two subscales including ADL and Sports subscales that have a complete score of 84 and 32, individually

Single Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 16 Years - 44 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

With a time, span of 3 days after the primary recording, a total of the 175 patients whose conditions were relied upon to stay stable were approached to complete the forms again in the retest meeting; no treatment was given during this time-frame.

You may qualify if:

• Ankle and foot disorders, referred by a general physician or surgeon,
• Conscious
• Ambulatory
• Able to write and read Urdu language

You may not qualify if:

• inflammatory disease
• vascular diseases
• neural diseases
• cancer

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Lahore: lead

Study Sites (1)

The University of Lahore

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (31)

• Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.22.1800. No abstract available.

  PMID: 7500513 BACKGROUND

• Cervera-Garvi P, Ortega-Avila AB, Morales-Asencio JM, Cervera-Marin JA, Martin RR, Gijon-Nogueron G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-Sp). J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Aug 22;10:39. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0221-6. eCollection 2017.

  PMID: 28852426 BACKGROUND

• Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):179-83. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.179.

  PMID: 18345343 BACKGROUND

• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.

  PMID: 17161752 BACKGROUND

• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;37(2):72-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403.

  PMID: 17366962 BACKGROUND

• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel CP, Bennett P. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 17;12:75. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-75.

  PMID: 24885123 BACKGROUND

• Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7818. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7818. No abstract available.

  PMID: 25670183 BACKGROUND

• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 26;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-126.

  PMID: 23889883 BACKGROUND

• Forget NJ, Higgins J. Comparison of generic patient-reported outcome measures used with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: linking process using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):327-34. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1784.

  PMID: 24531349 BACKGROUND

• De Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, Figueiredo VG. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959-65. doi: 10.1080/09638280701809872.

  PMID: 18720109 BACKGROUND

• Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK. Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):297-302. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0297.

  PMID: 19356352 BACKGROUND

• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.

  PMID: 11124735 BACKGROUND

• Bago d'Uva T, Van Doorslaer E, Lindeboom M, O'Donnell O. Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities? Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):351-75. doi: 10.1002/hec.1269.

  PMID: 17701960 BACKGROUND

• Lin CI, Houtenbos S, Lu YH, Mayer F, Wippert PM. The epidemiology of chronic ankle instability with perceived ankle instability- a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 May 28;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00480-w.

  PMID: 34049565 BACKGROUND

• Lopez-Lopez D, Perez-Rios M, Ruano-Ravina A, Losa-Iglesias ME, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Romero-Morales C, Calvo-Lobo C, Navarro-Flores E. Impact of quality of life related to foot problems: a case-control study. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 15;11(1):14515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93902-5.

  PMID: 34267276 BACKGROUND

• Saleh, A.M., et al., PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF TRANSLATED ARABIC VERSION OF FOOT AND ANKLE ABILITY MEASURE QUESTIONNAIRE. 32: p. 3.

  BACKGROUND

• Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;45(10):785-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

  PMID: 19955163 BACKGROUND

• Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Bravini E, Bargeri S, Moroso M, Plebani G, Ferriero G. [Foot and ankle ability measure: cross-cultural translation and validation of the Italian version of the ADL module (FAAM-I/ADL)]. Med Lav. 2014 Jul 15;105(5):357-65. Italian.

  PMID: 25134631 BACKGROUND

• Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, Karimi A, Parnianpour M. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jun;18(6):755-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

  PMID: 20338253 BACKGROUND

• Uematsu D, Suzuki H, Sasaki S, Nagano Y, Shinozuka N, Sunagawa N, Fukubayashi T. Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure. J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):65-70. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.42. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

  PMID: 25310247 BACKGROUND

• Angthong C. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Dec;22(4):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

  PMID: 27810018 BACKGROUND

• Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Li GZ, Ruiz Munoz M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(21):2182-2189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219772. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

  PMID: 27597231 BACKGROUND

• Celik D, Malkoc M, Martin R. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Rheumatol Int. 2016 Oct;36(10):1469-76. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3485-4. Epub 2016 May 2.

  PMID: 27136921 BACKGROUND

• Borloz S, Crevoisier X, Deriaz O, Ballabeni P, Martin RL, Luthi F. Evidence for validity and reliability of a French version of the FAAM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Feb 8;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-40.

  PMID: 21303520 BACKGROUND

• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Nov;26(11):968-83. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601113.

  PMID: 16309613 BACKGROUND

• Brown, T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2015: Guilford publications.

  BACKGROUND

• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.

  PMID: 11128900 BACKGROUND

• Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12.

  PMID: 2002127 BACKGROUND

• Maskey, R., et al., Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. 2018. 34(2): p. 91- 111.

  BACKGROUND

• Arunakul M, Arunakul P, Suesiritumrong C, Angthong C, Chernchujit B. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):561-7.

  PMID: 26219160 BACKGROUND

• Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications.

  BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Foot Injuries; Ankle Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 1, 2023
• First Posted: August 18, 2023
• Study Start: July 2, 2022
• Primary Completion: September 7, 2022
• Study Completion: November 15, 2022
• Last Updated: August 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations

PA (1)