Triage-Based Application of OFAR on the Number of Radiographs Ordered
OFAR
The Effect of Triage-Based Application of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules (OAR/OFR) on the Number of Radiographs Ordered: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Foot and ankle injuries account for nearly two million visits to Emergency Departments (EDs) in the United States and Canada each year. Of these injured patients, only 15% are diagnosed with actual fractures of the ankle. Due to such a small percentage, the "Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules" (OFAR) were developed, which are a set of clinical decision-making guidelines that have been shown to be effective in diagnosing ankle and foot fractures. These rules are internationally accepted by the medical community, but are inconsistently applied. At Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), the ED triage nurses are routinely trained in how to use the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules, but the rules are not always applied which may result in unnecessary X-rays. These guidelines are current network "standard of care" (usual, established care) that allow nurses to decide treatment for foot and ankle injury patients; in other words, whether to send these patients for an X-ray or not. The research staff is conducting this study in order to find out if using these nurse-directed guidelines--on a regular and consistent basis--can decrease the number of X-rays ordered, decrease patient waiting times/length of stay (LOS) and increase patient satisfaction with their care in the ED. STUDY PURPOSE: The two main goals of this study are to find out if use of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules by triage nurses can decrease the amount of X-rays ordered in the ED, as well as LOS. Secondary study goals are to: 1) see how many X-rays are ordered by physicians and physicians' assistants after patients are evaluated by the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules as not having had a fracture; and 2) evaluate patient and provider satisfaction with the care provided both when the Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules are used and when they are not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 8, 2016
June 1, 2014
8 months
January 22, 2013
September 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
amount of radiographs obtained in the ED.
This study aims to determine if triage application of the OAR and OFR can decrease the amount of radiographs obtained in the ED.
Participants will be followed for the duration of their ED stay, expected not to be greater than an average of 4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
waiting times/length of stay (LOS)
Participants will be followed for the duration of their ED stay, expected not to be greater than an average of 4 hours
Other Outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction with their care in the ED. patient satisfaction with their care in the ED.
Participants will be assessed at the end of their ED stay, expected not to be greater than an average of 4 hours
Study Arms (1)
Patients with foot and ankle injury
After baseline data is obtained a cohort of patients with acute foot and ankle injuries will have OFAR applied
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients presenting to an urban and suburban community hospital with acute foot or ankle injury
You may qualify if:
- Pt must be 16 years of age (patients below 18 must be assented)
- Pt must not be pregnant
- Pt must have an isolated traumatic ankle or foot injury
- Pt must be outpatients (not admitted or assigned to observation)
- Pt must be able to speak English or Spanish
- Pt must be competent and able to give consent, (not in critical condition, intoxicated or otherwise incapacitated)
- Pt must have no neurovascular (nerve/blood vessel) compromise
- Pt must have no open fracture or visible limb deformity
- Pt must not be a pediatric patient who presents with a gait abnormality of unknown origin.
You may not qualify if:
- Pt must not be under the age of 16
- Pt must not be pregnant
- Pt must not have a non-isolated traumatic ankle or foot injury
- Pt must not be inpatients (may not be admitted or assigned to observation)
- Pt must not be unable to speak English or Spanish
- Pt must not be incompetent and unable to give consent, (in critical condition, intoxicated, or otherwise incapacitated)
- Pt must not have neurovascular (nerve/blood vessel) compromise
- Pt must not have an open fracture or visible limb deformity
- Pt must not be a pediatric patient who presents with a gait abnormality of unknown origin.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marna R Greenberg, DO, MPH
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Emergency Medicine Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2013
First Posted
January 30, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2014-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share IPD, just publish the study results.