Effects of Online Exercise Intervention on Physical and Mental Conditions in Young Adults With Chronic Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of online exercise therapy with conventional exercise therapy on pain, function, psychological status and work efficiency of young adults with chronic neck pain. A randomized clinical trial recruiting 39 university students with self-reported chronic neck pain was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned into the experimental group receiving online exercise therapy and the active control group receiving conventional exercise therapy. Participants in both groups completed the same exercise program 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks, with either face-to-face or online mode of delivery by physiotherapists. The pain level was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) based on average and at maximum intensity. Neck function and work limitations were assessed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) respectively. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and its subscales (HADS-A and HADS-D) were used to evaluate the overall symptoms, levels of anxiety and depression respectively. Participants were assessed at baseline and at 6 weeks while the changes in WLQ were assessed biweekly. It is hypothesized that, young adults with chronic neck pain, both the online and conventional exercise interventions could improve their pain level, neck disability, anxiety state and work efficiency, and the online exercise intervention appeared feasible as an alternative treatment option for them.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
4 months
July 29, 2023
August 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
visual analog scale (VAS)
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales used for the first time in 1921 by Hayes and Patterson. It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. In this study, the VAS is used to measure the average and maximum neck pain level. The outcome is measured with 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), in which 0 indicating no pain and 10.0 indicating unbearable pain.
measured at baseline prior to randomization and after the 6-week intervention period
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a self-report questionnaire used to determine how neck pain affects a patient's daily life and to assess the self-rated disability of patients with neck pain. The NDI consists of 10 items related to pain intensity, headache, concentration and different physical activities. The score of each item ranges from 0 to 5. The maximum total score is 50 and the final score will be standardized into 0 to 100. The higher the score of the NDI, the more severe the neck dysfunction is.
measured at baseline prior to randomization and after the 6-week intervention period
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
measured at baseline prior to randomization and after the 6-week intervention period
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ)
measured at baseline prior to randomization and after the 2-week, 4-week, 6-week intervention period
Study Arms (2)
online exercise therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe participants had weekly online exercise meetings with the physiotherapist in a group of 3-5 participants using online meeting app. Then the participants performed the remaining two sessions of exercises themselves weekly. All the participants of the experimental group received a package of exercise pamphlet and a video disc containing 17-minute exercise demonstrations by the physiotherapist. At baseline, the suitable elastic bands (Thera-band®) for performing the exercises were selected by testing the 15 repetitions maximum (15RM) of the Modified Brügger's Exercise (MBE) and the Modified Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Diagonal Flexion Exercise (MPNFDFE) for the participants of both the experimental group and control group. Participants performed the following exercises three times a week for six weeks at home: A. Warm-up exercises B. Cranio-cervical flexion exercises C. Strength-endurance exercises D. Scapular stabilization exercises E. Stretching exercises
conventional exercise therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the control group completed the same exercise program three times a week for six weeks with face-to-face mode delivery by physiotherapists. At baseline, the suitable elastic bands (Thera-band®) for performing the exercises were selected by testing the 15 repetitions maximum (15RM) of the Modified Brügger's Exercise (MBE) and the Modified Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Diagonal Flexion Exercise (MPNFDFE) for the participants of both the experimental group and control group. Participants performed the following exercises three times a week for six weeks in a group of 3-5 participants in the laboratory of the Sport Medicine and Rehabilitation School of the Beijing Sport University: A. Warm-up exercises B. Cranio-cervical flexion exercises C. Strength-endurance exercises D. Scapular stabilization exercises E. Stretching exercises
Interventions
Exercise therapy is considered as the integral component of interventions for chronic non-specific neck pain. It includes different type resistance training, range of motion exercises and stretching exercises to improve neck condition and release symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults between 18 and 50 years of age with neck pain (from occiput to 7th cervical vertebra) for at least 3 months
- a score of \>= 4/50 on the Neck Disability Index.
You may not qualify if:
- adults with a history of previous neck surgery, cervical radiculopathy, acute neck injury or fracture
- persons who had more than two hours of moderate intensity exercise or more than four hours of low intensity exercise in a week
- persons who had received any form of physiotherapy treatment in the last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100091, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jinghua Qian, Doctor
Beijing Sport University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This experiment was performed as a single-blind experiment. The outcomes assessors are specialized personnel who do not participate in the trial intervention process and are not clear about the grouping of participants situation and the intervention situation. Outcome statistics were also performed by dedicated data analysts.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, deputy dean of School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2023
First Posted
August 15, 2023
Study Start
April 15, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08