NCT05986695

Brief Summary

This study addresses a critical gap of care for Veterans with heart failure (HF). Only 1/3 or fewer eligible Veterans are receiving recommended SGLT2 and MRA therapies that save lives and prevents HF hospitalizations. The investigators will compare the effect of clinician directed nudges as strategies to improve the health of Veterans with HF.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2023

Results QC Date

November 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsEconomics, Behavioralfeedbackmedical audit

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Effectiveness (MRA Prescriptions)

    The primary effectiveness outcome is the amount of SGLT2 or MRA prescriptions in eligible HF patients in the three intervention groups compared with the control group within 30 days of appointment. Thirty days is a common time interval for HF outcomes assessment and allows for chart documentation, care coordination, laboratory testing, and medication prescribing that may occur days after a patient encounter. The investigators will record all SGLT2 or MRA prescriptions, including those from non-targeted clinicians, given that nudge interventions, especially the informational alert, may impact other clinicians directly (e.g., view alert in EHR) or indirectly (e.g., referral from targeted clinician). Data represent a cumulative number of prescriptions filled.

    30 days

  • Effectiveness (SGLT2 Prescriptions)

    The primary effectiveness outcome is the amount of SGLT2 or MRA prescriptions in eligible HF patients in the three intervention groups compared with the control group within 30 days of appointment. Thirty days is a common time interval for HF outcomes assessment and allows for chart documentation, care coordination, laboratory testing, and medication prescribing that may occur days after a patient encounter. The investigators will record all SGLT2 or MRA prescriptions, including those from non-targeted clinicians, given that nudge interventions, especially the informational alert, may impact other clinicians directly (e.g., view alert in EHR) or indirectly (e.g., referral from targeted clinician). Data represent a cumulative number of prescriptions filled.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Reach-Clinician

    6 months

  • Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    30 days

  • Implementation-Acceptability

    6 months

  • Reach-Patient

    6 months

  • Reach-Comparison of Strategies

    6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Peer Comparison Report

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Clinicians assigned to peer comparison, will receive messages by secure email every two weeks regarding their SGLT2i and MRA prescribing performance.

Behavioral: Peer comparison report

Alert

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Clinicians in the alert arm will receive an alert two business days prior to a patient's upcoming appointment. Clinicians will receive approximately two alerts per week.

Behavioral: Alert

Alert and Peer Comparison

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The combined alert and peer comparison arm will receive both interventions.

Behavioral: AlertBehavioral: Peer comparison report

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No alert or peer comparison

Interventions

AlertBEHAVIORAL

Interruptive alert. The prototype alert is in the form of a chart note with evidence-based practice guidelines that will actively display in the clinician's list of daily alerts (like an inbox) that must be cleared daily. It is interruptive because can only be dismissed from the clinician's inbox list after signing the note

AlertAlert and Peer Comparison

Clinicians will receive an email describing their recent SGLT2 and MRA prescribing performance relative to their peers.

Alert and Peer ComparisonPeer Comparison Report

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary care and cardiology clinicians at Southern AZ VA Health Care System working in outpatient clinic setting

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinicians who are in training status (resident, fellow) will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ

Tucson, Arizona, 85723-0001, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureBehavior

Interventions

Caffeine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

XanthinesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsPurinonesPurinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Limitations and Caveats

At this point the study does not have any limitations nor caveats.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sandesh Dev
Organization
Tucson VA Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Sandesh Dev, MD

    Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Statistician will be blinded to treatment assignment.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: This is a type 3 hybrid (implementation focused), four group, pragmatic trial of cardiology and primary care clinicians at a single VA medical center. The trial will include a 3-month preintervention period and 3-month intervention period. Clinicians will be randomized to one of four arms: usual care, informational alert, peer comparison feedback, and combination of alert and peer comparison.
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2023

First Posted

August 14, 2023

Study Start

June 9, 2023

Primary Completion

October 31, 2024

Study Completion

October 31, 2024

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Results First Posted

May 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available. A Limited Dataset (LDS) will be created and shared pursuant to a Data Use Agreement (DUA) appropriately limiting use of the dataset and prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-identifying (or taking steps to identify or re-identify) any individual whose data are included in the dataset.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations