Improving the Health of Parents and Their Adolescent and Transition-age Youth With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
1 other identifier
interventional
406
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study will determine the comparative effectiveness of Go Act, a tailored advocacy curriculum versus Peer parent-directed peer learning for increasing parent activation for parents of youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Second, it will determine the comparative effectiveness of the two study arms for improving parent and youth health outcomes while assessing whether parent activation serves as a mechanism that mediates their effects on health outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2026
January 29, 2026
December 1, 2025
2.8 years
August 3, 2023
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Difference in change in parent activation
The Parent Patient Activation Measure will be used to capture parent activation on behalf of their child (mean score=70) at 6, 12 and 18 months after intervention. The Parent Patient Activation Measure is a parent self-report 13-item scale with 4-level likert responses and scores ranging from 0 to 100.
up to18 months after intervention
Difference in change in youth social functioning- life satisfaction
Youth social functioning will be assessed using the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for children life satisfaction measure at 6, 12 and 18 months after intervention.
up to18 months after intervention
Difference in change in parent depression
Parent depression will be measured with the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire at 6, 12 and 18 months after intervention. The Patient Health Questionnaire is scored from 0 to 24.
up to 18 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Difference in change in parenting self-efficacy
up to 18 months after intervention
Difference in change in shared decision-making
up to 18 months after intervention
Difference in change in alliance
up to 18 months after intervention
Difference in change in goal attainment
up to 18 months after intervention
Difference in change in stress
up to 18 months after intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Go Act
ACTIVE COMPARATORGo Act is structured as a small group intervention for parents, consisting of four 60-minute sessions occurring over a 4-week period.
Peer
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeer is structured as a small group intervention for parents, consisting of four 60-minute sessions occurring over a 4-week period.
Interventions
Go Act sessions address becoming a parent who can 'Go Act,' caring for one's self as a parent, understanding and managing youth health needs, working with health providers as partners, and working with other service providers such as schools and vocational services. The intervention uses motivational interviewing, story-telling with self-disclosure, psycho-education introduced with a know-want to know-learned strategy, problem-solving, role play, and practice outside of class.
During Peer sessions facilitators lay ground rules for respectful and confidential sharing and encourage group discussion. The group provides a format to make personal connections through shared identity. Participants may discuss strategies for individualized advocacy, so that they learn from the experiences of others.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents
- Raising an adolescent or young adult child (age 11-27), with diagnosed or suspected intellectual or developmental disability
- Able to attend group sessions
- Able to give informed consent
- Resident of any state except New York or Illinois due to electronic signature law
- Youth
- Being between the ages of 11 and 27
- Having diagnosed or suspected intellectual or developmental disability
You may not qualify if:
- Parents
- Having evidence of emergency mental health needs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities
Carrboro, North Carolina, 27510, United States
UNC Adult Psychiatry Clinic
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kathleen C Thomas, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2023
First Posted
August 14, 2023
Study Start
August 8, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has approved Institutional Review Board, Independent Ethics Committee, or Research Ethics Board and an executed data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
De-identified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board, Independent Ethics Committee, or Research Ethics Board, as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.