Osteo Match Cages Versus PEEK Cages in Osteoporotic Patients
OMC
Biomechanical-matched Titanium Cages(Osteo Match) Versus PEEK Cages in Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. The osteoporotic patients requiring posterior lumbar interbody fusion(LIF) with cages are prospectively enrolled and followed up. The patients undergoing LIF with the biomechanical-matched 3D-printed titanium cages (Osteo Match) are compared with those using routine PEEK cages. The hypothesis is that the use of Osteo Match cages can reduce the rate of cage subsidence and increase the rate of lumbar fusion in osteoporotic patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2023
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
January 22, 2025
January 1, 2025
3 years
August 1, 2023
January 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cage subsidence rate
The presence of cage subsidence \> 2mm at x-ray or CT images.
6 months
Fusion rate
The presence of continuous fusion mass at bone graft site in CT scans and absence of intervertebral mobility on lateral flextion-extension x-ray images.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Osteo Match cage
Patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with Osteo Match Cages
Peek Cage
Patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with PEEK Cages
Eligibility Criteria
The osteoporotic patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion with cages for lumbar degenerative diseases are invited to participate in the study.
You may qualify if:
- aged≥ 50 years old
- lumbar degenerative diseases requiring lumbar fusion with pedicle screw fixation, such as degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
- no response to nonoperative treatment of at least 3 months
- osteoporosis diagnosed by any method for bone mineral density evaluation, such as DXA, QCTor CT Hounsfield units
- requiring lumbar interbody fusion with cages within L3-S1
- the type of fusion cage has been chosen by the patients
- informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- the surgical plan includes any unconventional techniques used to strengthen the fixation, such as augmentation of the pedicle screw with bone cement
- lumbar spondylolisthesis of ≥II degree
- lumbar scoliosis of \>20° or imbalance of spinal alignment
- history of lumbar fusion surgery
- cervical myelopathy, thoracic spinal stenosis, motor neuron disease,tuberculosis of spine,spinal tumor
- vertebral fracture within interbody fusion segement
- ASA of ≥IV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
Related Publications (5)
Zou D, Yue L, Fan Z, Zhao Y, Leng H, Sun Z, Li W. Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages With Various Elastic Moduli in Osteoporotic and Non-osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Analysis. Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):2053-2061. doi: 10.1177/21925682231166612. Epub 2023 May 3.
PMID: 37132375BACKGROUNDMcGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, Regan D, Berven SH, Hsu WK, Mroz TE, Puttlitz CM. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29496624BACKGROUNDLi P, Jiang W, Yan J, Hu K, Han Z, Wang B, Zhao Y, Cui G, Wang Z, Mao K, Wang Y, Cui F. A novel 3D printed cage with microporous structure and in vivo fusion function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019 Jul;107(7):1386-1392. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36652. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30724479BACKGROUNDGoldstein CL, Brodke DS, Choma TJ. Surgical Management of Spinal Conditions in the Elderly Osteoporotic Spine. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S98-107. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000948.
PMID: 26378363BACKGROUNDZou D, Jiang S, Zhou S, Sun Z, Zhong W, Du G, Li W. Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Combination of DXA and Hounsfield Units. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 1;45(7):E406-E410. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003284.
PMID: 31725127BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Weishi Li
Peking University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2023
First Posted
August 8, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01