Dry Cupping Therapy on Rotator Cuff Injuries
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Dry Cupping Therapy on Rotator Cuff Injuries
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Shoulder pain is the most common musculoskeletal problem after spine and knee complaints. Rotator cuff injuries (RCI) are the most common cause of shoulder pain. RCI includes a wide spectrum from subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) to chronic tendinopathy, partial and total ruptures of the rotator cuff. In recent years there has been a renewed interest in traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) for various musculoskeletal problems. Cupping therapy, which is one of the most commonly used TCM methods, is one of the oldest medical applications with thousands of years of history. Although it is thought to be effective in many diseases, there are not enough studies in the literature about its effectiveness and mechanism of action. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of moving dry cupping therapy on pain, range of motion (ROM), functionality and quality of life in RCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2023
CompletedDecember 13, 2024
December 1, 2024
4 months
July 25, 2023
December 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Shoulder Pain
Pain was evaluated with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The patient was asked to mark his pain in numerical values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very severe pain). The higher the score obtained from this test, the more pain the patient has, and the smaller the score, the less the pain is predicted.
1 months
Range of Motion
Shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation in the supine position using a baseline goniometer; Shoulder extension ROM in the prone position was evaluated as passive.
1 months
Constant-Murley Score
Developed in 1987, this scoring system evaluates pain, activities of daily living, strength, and ROM. Its score ranges from 0 to 100 points, representing worst and best shoulder function, respectively. In the original publication, the pain experienced during normal activities of daily living was scored as: no pain = 15 points, mild = 10, moderate = 5 and severe = 0 points
1 months
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100
1 months
Short Form (SF-36)
SF-36, which is one of the most preferred scales in assessing the quality of life, consists of a total of 36 questions and 8 sections. It is divided into 8 parts as physical function, social function, physical role difficulty, emotional role difficulty, mental health, energy/vitality, pain and general health perception. Each section is scored between 0-100 in itself. High scores indicate high quality of life.
1 months
Study Arms (2)
Dry Cupping Therapy Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn addition to the conventional treatment, moving cup application was applied for 10 minutes twice a week. During the treatment, the patients were placed in a side-lying position with the affected side on top. Liquid petroleum jelly was applied on the skin and negative pressure was created with a manual pump, allowing the cup to be slid on the skin. Care was taken to ensure that the negative pressure would not cause increased pain and would allow the cup to slide. Deltoid, Trapeze, Supraspinatus, Infraspinatus, Pectoral muscles were applied in the origo insertion direction for a total of 10 minutes.
Conservative Treatment Group
OTHERThe patients in the control group received a conservative treatment program including hotpack (20 min), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS) (COMPEX Rehab 400 - 20 min), ultrasound (Chattanooga Ultrasound - 1 megahertz, 1.5 W/cm², 5 min) for 4 weeks, 5 days a week, and wand, Codman, stretching and strengthening exercises were applied.Stretching exercises were added to the treatment for the shoulder girdle and scapular region muscles, while strengthening exercises were added to the treatment by increasing the resistance at the pain limit. In addition, the home exercise program was taught to be 10 repetitions 2 times a day.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age range
- Clinical diagnosis ofRCI, SIS, supraspinatus tendinitis
- To be fully cooperative
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who had undergone any surgical operation on the shoulder
- A history of shoulder fracture
- Severe osteoporosis
- Total tendon rupture
- Had received oral/intramuscular steroids in the last 1 month
- Had been administered intra-articular drugs in the last 3 months
- Difficulty in cooperation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Esra ATILGAN
Medipol University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hatice Hümeyra AKIL
Uskudar University
- STUDY CHAIR
Sümeyye TUNÇ
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2023
First Posted
August 4, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12