Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Alone Following Shoulder Stabilization Repair
Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling and Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Alone Following Shoulder Stabilization Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
39
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of dry needling compared to a standard shoulder rehabilitation program on range of motion, functional movement, and pain in patients who have undergone shoulder stabilization surgery. Measurements of the aforementioned dependent variables will be taken at time intervals of four weeks, eight weeks, 12 weeks, and six months post-operatively. It is hypothesized that the inclusion of dry needling will result in an increase in range of motion, increase in functional movement, and decrease in pain at an accelerated rate when compared to rehabilitation alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 10, 2025
CompletedNovember 10, 2025
October 1, 2025
1.8 years
March 1, 2016
September 11, 2025
October 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Shoulder Flexion Passive Range of Movement (PROM)
Subject is supine with hips and knees flexed for stabilization. Elbow will be extended, forearm relaxed, and wrist in neutral position. Subjects' arm will be raised into forward flexion by the practitioner. The stationary arm of the goniometer will be placed parallel to the spine but at the lateral aspect of the body. The moving arm of the goniometer will be placed along the midline of the humerus.
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Shoulder External Rotation PROM at 8 Weeks
Subject is supine on the plinth with hips and knees flexed for stabilization. Tested arm abducted to 90 degrees. Elbow flexed to 90 degrees. Forearm in the midposition between supination and pronation and perpendicular to the plinth. Subject arm rotated by the practitioner. The stationary arm of the goniometer will be horizontal to the plinth with the pivot of the protractor on the olecranon process. The moving arm of the goniometer is in line with the styloid process of the ulna.
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Shoulder Internal Rotation (IR) PROM
Subject is supine on the plinth with hips and knees flexed for stabilization. Tested arm abducted to 90 degrees, elbow flexed to 90 degrees, forearm in the midposition between supination and pronation and perpendicular to the plinth,. Subject arm internally rotated by practitioner. Stationary arm of goniometer horizontal to the plinth with the pivot of the protractor on the olecranon process. Moving arm of the goniometer in line with the styloid process of the ulna.
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Numerical Scale from 1-10. Subjects are asked self-report pain on a scale from 1 - 10, 1 being the least amount of pain and 10 being the most. The Minimum Important Difference for the NPRS (on a scale from 0-10) range from -1.5 (small change) to -3.0 (medium change) to -3.5 (large change)
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Global Rating of Change
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Patient Specific Functional Scale
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Functional Outcome Measure
at 8 weeks post-op, 12 weeks post-op, 6 months post-op
Study Arms (2)
Rehabilitation and Dry Needling
EXPERIMENTALStandard Rehabilitation Protocol following shoulder stabilization surgery and Dry Needling to the Shoulder girdle 1 time a week for 4 weeks between weeks 4 and 8 post operatively
Rehabilitation
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard Rehabilitation Protocol following shoulder stabilization surgery alone
Interventions
Subjects will receive post-operative rehabilitation that is the standard of care for the surgical procedure they underwent. Rehabilitation will begin within one week after surgery and will continue for the duration of their recovery; two to three treatments a week for approximately 6-9 months. Subjects in this group will also receive dry needling as an adjunct intervention. Dry needling treatment will be performed one time a week for four weeks and will begin four weeks post-operative.
Subjects will receive post-operative rehabilitation that is the standard of care for the surgical procedure they underwent. Rehabilitation will begin within one week after surgery and will continue for the duration of their recovery; two to three treatments a week for approximately 6-9 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- yo DOD Beneficiaries
- Status Post Shoulder Stabilization Repair Surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Self-Reported Pregnancy
- History of blood borne pathogens/infectious disease/active infection/metal allergy
- Bleeding disorders or currently taking anti-coagulant medications
- Participants who are not fluent in English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There may have been differences in manual therapy received between the two groups. The control group received additional rehab. The follow-up period was also relatively short, at 6 months. The inclusion criteria were also very specific to the subset of the population.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rob Halle
- Organization
- United States Army
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 10, 2025
Results First Posted
November 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share