NCT05935020

Brief Summary

The aim of this feasibility trial is to investigate the feasibility of a trial intervention for a population of patients after total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. This study follows a hybrid type 1 design where the primary focus is on the feasibility of the intervention, and the secondary focus is on gaining a better understanding of context and acceptability. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Recruitment (Process/Resources): Are patients willing to engage, and stay, in the trial (estimated by inclusion-rate, participant retention, etc.) and what reasons do patients give for not wishing to enroll or later dropping out of the trial? (inquired face-to-face, during enrolment).
  • Harms (Scientific): Does the non-exercise intervention appear "safe" (i.e. not harmful) for the patients? (estimated by for instance: adverse events, reasons for dropouts and sense of security).
  • Trial procedure feasibility (Management/Scientific): How well does recruitment and trial procedures work at trial sites? (estimated through feedback from site personnel).
  • Participant (patient) experienced acceptability of their assigned intervention: An interview-based follow-up using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Participants will be randomized to one of two interventions, at discharge from the hospital, following knee replacement, which are being tested for feasibility:
  • "Usual-care" - referral to municipal (free-of-charge) physiotherapy (commonly 6-8 weeks of therapeutic exercise).
  • "Return to everyday life" - no referral to municipal physiotherapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 7, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 22, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 26, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Total Knee ReplacementOsteoarthritis, KneeExercise-based Rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Feasibility Trial - Primary outcome is an evaluation of trial feasibility:

    The following criteria are considered most important to evaluate feasibility: * No more than 20% of participants may drop out of the "return-to-everyday-life" group because they change their mind and wish to receive exercise-based rehabilitation instead (wish to cross over) * At least 10% of the patients who receive full trial information, are subsequently enrolled in the trial * At least 85% of enrolled participants complete the primary outcome assessment at 12 weeks * At least one participant (on average) must be included at each site, each week The criteria, and and all other outcomes, form the basis of a trial group discussion with the intent of agreeing on one of the following interpretations (large-scale trial feasibility): 1\) Main study not feasible - stop main study, 2) Feasible with modification - continue main study with modifications, 3) Feasible without modification - no modifications but close monitoring, 4) Feasible as is - continue without modifications.

    Full duration of feasibility trial from enrollment to last follow-up at 12 weeks from surgery

  • Recruitment (Process and resources):

    * Enrolment rate - how many of the eligible patients (given full trial information) end up as participants (signed informed consent) * Barriers to participation - why do patients decline to enroll (enquired when they decline participation when given full trial information) * Retention rate - how many participants complete the 12-week follow-up * Barriers to retention - why do participants decide to discontinue participation in the trial * Eligibility criteria - how many participants drop out after enrolment * Trial measures - how many participants have blank/incomplete/complete tests and questionnaires

    Full duration of feasibility trial from enrollment to last follow-up at 12 weeks from surgery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Harms (Scientific)

    Full duration of feasibility trial from enrollment to last follow-up at 12 weeks from surgery

  • Trial personnel feasibility (Management/Scientific)

    Full duration of feasibility trial from enrollment to last follow-up at 12 weeks from surgery

  • Participant symptom guide follow-up

    Full duration of feasibility trial from enrollment to last follow-up at 12 weeks from surgery

  • Participant (patient) experiences and experienced acceptability; of their allocated intervention

    Interviews will be conducted after participants complete the 12 week follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Referral to municipal rehabilitation after TKA

Other: Usual care - Municipal exercise-based rehabilitationBehavioral: Symptom guide and encouragement to follow DHA/WHO recommendations for physical activity

Return to Everyday Life

OTHER

No referral to municipal rehabilitation after TKA

Other: Return to Everyday lifeBehavioral: Symptom guide and encouragement to follow DHA/WHO recommendations for physical activity

Interventions

The patients in this group follow prescribed (by the orthopedic surgeon) "usual care" municipal exercise-based rehabilitation. The content of the rehabilitation is planned in collaboration between the patient and the physical therapist, based on the offered municipal treatment options (which varies between municipalities) and patient preferences (i.e., home-based exercise, outpatient exercise, group-based exercise, or a combination thereof). The contents of the municipal services offered will be described in detail in the trial report. A prescribed therapeutic rehabilitation exercise plan could for instance be a 6-week combined home-exercise (1-2 times/week) and group-exercise (1 time/week) intervention, followed by encouragement to continue self-administered home exercise after the 6 weeks.

Also known as: Referral to Municipal Rehabilitation after Surgery
Usual Care

The patients in this group return to their desired pre-surgical activities, at their own speed, when they feel that they are ready for it. They are not prescribed any exercise-based rehabilitation (usual care) by their orthopedic surgeon. This effectively means they will not receive a therapeutic progressive exercise plan; designed and prescribed to restore previous function or reducing pain or disability caused by injury, disease, or surgery - typically referred to as "exercise therapy" or "therapeutic exercise".

Also known as: No referral to municipal rehabilitation after surgery
Return to Everyday Life

Participants in both groups receive a recovery-guide pamphlet at discharge, containing the following information: 1) Recommendations to follow DHA/WHO guidelines for physical activity, 2) Figures and tables describing common post-operative symptoms (symptom guide), and when to react (when the symptoms may require attention from a health-professional), 3) What to expect from the post-surgical period in relation to activities of daily living, 4) Common short- and long-term complications to total knee arthroplasty and 5) Trial-participant and ethics-committee information documents. Parts 2-4 are usual clinical practice, with slight variations in descriptions between sites. After surgery, participants in both groups are encouraged to resume their desired pre-surgical activities when they feel they are able (within the limits given from the orthopedic wards).

Also known as: Symptom self-management and encouraged physical activity
Return to Everyday LifeUsual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Residing in one of fourteen collaboration municipalities
  • Referral to primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

You may not qualify if:

  • Insufficient danish skills (read/write/speak) to understand questionnaires and outcomes
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Severe surgical sequelae (i.e. requiring revision surgery, joint mobilization under anaestesia, or joint infection)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Næstved Sygehus

Næstved, 4700, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Gronfeldt BM, Skou ST, Kirk JW, Troelsen A, Bandholm T; DRAW-TKA collaborator group. Feasibility of a randomized trial comparing exercise-based rehabilitation to no exercise-based rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: DRAW-TKA hybrid 1 RCT. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025 Nov 21;8(1):100708. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100708. eCollection 2026 Mar.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Investigator and Outcomes Assessor are blinded to participant group allocation. Further, the personnel administering the intervention after discharge from the surgical ward (Care Provider) is masked.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two group, parallel, randomized, controlled feasibility trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2023

First Posted

July 7, 2023

Study Start

August 22, 2023

Primary Completion

June 10, 2024

Study Completion

September 10, 2024

Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share IPD.

Locations