IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric ED
Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal (IN) Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine Evaluating Length of Stay After Medication Administration and Anxiolysis During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric Population in Pediatric Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain in young children has been universally under-recognized due to their inability to describe or localize pain. Improvements in pharmacological interventions are necessary to optimize patient and family experience and allow for successful and efficient procedure completion. This is the first study that will compare three intranasal medications (Intranasal Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Ketamine) to evaluate the length of stay after medication administration along with patient and provider satisfaction. The objective of this study is to demonstrate superior intranasal anxiolysis for pediatric laceration repairs with the shortest emergency department stay and highest patient and provider satisfaction. Based on previous studies and medication pharmacokinetics, we hypothesize that Intranasal Ketamine will have the shortest Emergency Department (ED) stay followed by Midazolam and then Dexmedetomidine with the longest stay; however, Dexmedetomidine will have the highest patient and provider satisfaction followed by Ketamine and then Midazolam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedJune 28, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.5 years
June 16, 2023
June 26, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome will measure the time to discharge after intranasal medication administration
The nurse will document the time the medication is administered and the time of discharge once the patient meets American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criteria of discharge. AAP discharge criteria includes cardiovascular function and airway potency satisfactory; arousable and protective reflexes are intact; able to talk appropriately for age; able to sit up appropriately for age; and state of hydration is adequate
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary outcome will measure patient's anxiety using the previously validated scale mYPAS and physician and parent satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale
Day 1
Study Arms (3)
Intranasal Midazolam
EXPERIMENTALDose/Concentration: 5mg/ml of 0.4mg/kg Midazolam (max dose 10mg). Adverse side effects include respiratory depression and hypotension. Intranasal Midazolam is standard of care for minimal procedures in pediatric ED.
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALDose/Concentration: 100mcg/ml of 2mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine (max dose 100mcg). Adverse side effects include Hypotension and Bradycardia at high dosages. IV Dexmedetomidine is FDA approved and widely used in sedation. IN form isn't FDA approved; however, it has been approved to conduct research studies that have showed its efficacy in pre-operative settings, imaging-CT or MRI, dental procedures, and much more. Specifically, in a pediatric ED setting, Neville et al conducted a study comparing intranasal Dexmedetomidine and intranasal Midazolam prior to laceration repair in a pediatric emergency department and showed safe administration of Dexmedetomidine.
Intranasal Ketamine
EXPERIMENTALDose/Concentration: 100mg/ml of 3mg/kg Ketamine (max dose 100mg). Adverse side effect include Laryngospasm. IV Ketamine is FDA approved and widely used in procedural sedation in pediatric EDs. IN form isn't FDA approved in pediatric population; however, it has also been approved to conduct research studies especially in combination with other medications. Gutherie et al conducted a study demonstrating intranasal Ketamine providing safe and successful anxiolysis in pediatric patients in an ED setting.
Interventions
Using a computer-generated randomization schedule by the research pharmacist, all 90 subjects will be divided into 3 even groups to receive either medication A (intranasal Midazolam), B (intranasal Dexmedetomidine), or C (intranasal Ketamine). Based on the randomization schedule, the pharmacist will dispense medication A, B, or C to the chronological number provided in the order. The total amount of the medication will be based on the patient's charted weight. Small volumes of less than 1ml per nostril are preferred for reliable absorption; therefore, the medication will be dispensed in a 1ml syringe and the barrel of the syringe will be covered by the pharmacist. All the syringes sent from the pharmacy will appear the same, regardless of the volume of the medication.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 1-5 years old
- Presents to the ED for suture repair for lacerations less than or equal to 5cm in length
- Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) speak English
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 12 months of age or older than 5 years old
- Suture repair needed for lacerations are greater than 5cm in length
- Known allergy or adverse effect to Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, or any other sedatives
- Any abnormal vital signs for age, especially heart rate and blood pressure
- History of Cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disease
- Known electrolyte abnormalities
- Any ocular trauma, nasal injury, nasal deformity, significant nasal congestion, abnormalities in the nasal or oral mucosa, facial deformity, or facial injury
- Home medications include beta blockers or any other blood pressure lowering agents Classified American Society of Anesthesiologists III and above
- Known or anticipated difficult airway
- Abnormal neurological exam
- Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) do not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (16)
Shaw KN, Bachur RG, editors. Fleisher & Ludwig's Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, e129, 2021
BACKGROUNDZempsky WT, Cravero JP; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1348-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1752.
PMID: 15520120BACKGROUNDEveritt IJ, Barnett P. Comparison of two benzodiazepines used for sedation of children undergoing suturing of a laceration in an emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Apr;18(2):72-4. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200204000-00002.
PMID: 11973494BACKGROUNDIirola T, Vilo S, Manner T, Aantaa R, Lahtinen M, Scheinin M, Olkkola KT. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1002-y. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
PMID: 21318594BACKGROUNDYuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Wong GL, Yuen MK. Optimal timing for the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2010 Sep;65(9):922-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06453.x.
PMID: 20645951BACKGROUNDCarlone G, Trombetta A, Amoroso S, Poropat F, Barbi E, Cozzi G. Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine, a Feasible Option for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders Needing Urgent Procedural Sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jun;35(6):e116-e117. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001776. No abstract available.
PMID: 31157751BACKGROUNDAzizkhani R, Heydari F, Ghazavi M, Riahinezhad M, Habibzadeh M, Bigdeli A, Golshani K, Majidinejad S, Mohammadbeigi A. Comparing Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam for Sedation of Children While Undergoing Computerized Tomography Imaging. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep;15(3):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jpn.JPN_107_19. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
PMID: 33531939BACKGROUNDGuthrie AM, Baum RA, Carter C, Dugan A, Jones L, Tackett T, Bailey AM. Use of Intranasal Ketamine in Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1001-e1007. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001863.
PMID: 31290798BACKGROUNDNeville DN, Hayes KR, Ivan Y, McDowell ER, Pitetti RD. Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):910-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12998.
PMID: 27129606BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD, Hofstadter MB. The Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how does it compare with a "gold standard"? Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):783-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00012.
PMID: 9322455BACKGROUNDGyanesh P, Haldar R, Srivastava D, Agrawal PM, Tiwari AK, Singh PK. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):12-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1657-x. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PMID: 23800984BACKGROUNDSurendar MN, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Kumar R, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966.
PMID: 25095322BACKGROUNDCravero JP, Askins N, Sriswasdi P, Tsze DS, Zurakowski D, Sinnott S. Validation of the Pediatric Sedation State Scale. Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5):e20162897. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2897.
PMID: 28557732BACKGROUNDTug A, Hanci A, Turk HS, Aybey F, Isil CT, Sayin P, Oba S. Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Dec;17(6):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0145-1.
PMID: 26323489BACKGROUNDMarra P, Di Stadio A, Colacurcio V, Scarpa A, La Mantia I, Salzano FA, De Luca P. Sedation with Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in the Pediatric Population for Auditory Brainstem Response Testing: Review of the Existing Literature. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;10(2):287. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020287.
PMID: 35206901BACKGROUNDLewis J, Bailey CR. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children; a review. J Perioper Pract. 2020 Jun;30(6):170-175. doi: 10.1177/1750458919854885. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
PMID: 31246159BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan Mckee, MD
University of Oklahoma
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A double blind randomized study. Except for the pharmacist, all treating ED physicians, nurses, patients, patients' caregivers/guardians, ancillary staff, and data analysts will be blinded to the medication administered to the patient. The medication will be dispensed in a 1ml syringe and the barrel of the syringe will be covered by the pharmacist. All the syringes sent from the pharmacy will appear the same, regardless of the volume of the medication.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2023
First Posted
July 7, 2023
Study Start
November 14, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Three years after the completion of the study
Research records for this study will be maintained for three years following its completion to allow for inspection by government agencies, the sponsor, the University, and other applicable entities.