Study Stopped
Staffing for study was eliminated
IN Ketamine vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Laceration Repair
Comparison of Sedation, Pain, and Care Provider Satisfaction Between the Use of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam and Fentanyl During Laceration Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Often, repair of the cuts (laceration repair) proves to be traumatic for the children and the parents. Nasal spray (Intranasal/IN) approaches for procedural pain reduction, such as during dental work, have been demonstrated to make drug administration painless and well tolerated. We are comparing IN ketamine to IN midazolam and fentanyl for pain and reducing anxiety during repair of cuts in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 6, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2021
CompletedAugust 24, 2021
July 1, 2021
5 months
May 5, 2018
May 11, 2021
July 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sedation Score
The primary outcome variable is the maximum sedation score as measured by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. This scale consists of an ordinal scale from 0 being awake and alert and 4 being unarousable. Medians will be calculated for each group.
up to 30 minutes
Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score
The proportion of children who receive a maximum sedation score of either 1 or 2 (without distinguishing between those values)
Up to 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain Scores During Laceration Repair
Up to 30 minutes
Nurse and Physician Satisfaction
Up to 30 minutes
Rates of Failure
Up to 30 minutes
Change in Vitals
up to 30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
IN ketamine
EXPERIMENTALIntranasal ketamine 3mg/kg (max 100 mg) + saline 0.03 ml/kg (max 2ml)
IN midazolam and fentanyl
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)
Interventions
Intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg/kg (max 10 mg) + fentanyl 1.5mcg/kg (max 100 mcg)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric patients 6 months to 10 years who required laceration repair in the pediatric emergency center.
- Laceration should be less than 5 cm long, require 2 or more sutures and no consult subspeciality consult for repair.
- Topical anesthetic (lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine topical solution/XAP) will be applied to all lacerations for 20 minutes duration before giving the intranasal medications.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 6 months
- Documented allergy or adverse effect to ketamine, midazolam or fentanyl
- Epistaxis
- Partial upper airway obstruction
- Oxygen requirement via nasal cannula
- Acute mental status changes (e.g. obtunded or somnolent)
- Documented increased intracranial pressure or increased ocular pressure
- Documented porphyria
- Previously involved in the study
- Parent or patient refusal
- Acutely compromised vitals (hypotension, desaturations, respiratory distress)
- Any known heart disease
- If any previous opioid use for analgesia during the visit
- Need for staples
- Scalp wounds
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study terminated early because staffing was eliminated. No results analyzed due to population size.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Margaret Menoch
- Organization
- William Beaumont Hospitals
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelly Levasseur, DO
Corewell Health East
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A randomization list created by an online randomization tool will be used to assign participants to a treatment arm (in random blocks of 4, 6, and 8). As participants are enrolled in the study, they will be assigned to the next available sequential treatment arm.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pediatric ER Medical Clinical Faculty
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2018
First Posted
May 18, 2018
Study Start
September 4, 2018
Primary Completion
February 6, 2019
Study Completion
February 6, 2019
Last Updated
August 24, 2021
Results First Posted
August 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share