3-point vs 6-point GNRFA for Chronic KOA
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of a Three-Point Versus a Six-Point Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare three-point and six-point Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation (GNRFA) in adults with chronic knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The main question it aims to answer is whether six- target GNRFA technique is more efficacious than standard three-target GNRFA technique in managing the pain and function of KOA. Consented patients who respond to a diagnostic block will be randomly assigned to either three-point or six-point GNRFA. Researchers will compare pain and function in these two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 3, 2024
November 1, 2024
10 months
June 26, 2023
November 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale score
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale quantifies knee pain severity with activities of daily living. It is a self-administered instrument containing 24 items measuring 3 subscales: physical function (17 items), pain (5 items), and stiffness (2 items). Higher points signify higher levels of functional difficulty. This will be captured by change in WOMAC scores from baseline at 12 weeks
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Numerical rating scale
4 time points: 30 min, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 week spost procedure
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale score
2 time points: 4 weeks and 24 weeks post procedure
Opioid intake
24 weeks post procedure
Other Outcomes (1)
Incidence of adverse effects
3 time points: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks post procedure
Study Arms (2)
Three-target GNRFA technique (T1)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadiofrequency ablation will target three of the genicular nerves: the superolateral genicular nerve, the superomedial genicular nerve, and the inferomedial genicular nerve.
Six-target GNRFA technique (T2)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadiofrequency ablation will target six of the genicular nerves: the superolateral genicular nerve, the superomedial genicular nerve, the inferomedial genicular nerve, two branches from the nerve of vastus intermedius, and the recurrent fibular nerve
Interventions
Genicular radiofrequency ablation uses thermal energy to percutaneously create lesions in neural tissues of the genicular nerves that innervate the anterior knee capsule and disrupt the conduction of pain signals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Chronic knee pain for at least 3 months with radiological evidence of KOA graded 2-4 on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale as determined by a radiologist
You may not qualify if:
- unwilling,
- unable to communicate in English,
- have acute knee pain,
- prior knee surgery,
- allergies to local anesthetics,
- chronic opioid consumption of daily morphine equivalent of \>30 mg for at least four weeks prior to procedure,
- neurologic diseases affecting the lower limbs (i.e. previous CVA, MS),
- connective tissue diseases affecting the knee,
- treatment with intra-articular steroid injections and/or hyaluronic acid in the previous 3 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (12)
Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S20-S23. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab129.
PMID: 34308957BACKGROUNDMolloy, L. (2022, May 10). Wait times for priority procedures in Canada. CIHI. Retrieved September 10, 2022, from https://www.cihi.ca/en/wait-times-for-priority-procedures-in-canada
BACKGROUNDOudhoff JP, Timmermans DR, Knol DL, Bijnen AB, van der Wal G. Waiting for elective general surgery: impact on health related quality of life and psychosocial consequences. BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 19;7:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-164.
PMID: 17640382BACKGROUNDTate, Q., Conger, A., Burnham, T. et al. The Effectiveness and Safety of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: a Comprehensive Literature Review. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 7, 404-413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-019-00246-3
BACKGROUNDFogarty AE, Burnham T, Kuo K, Tate Q, Sperry BP, Cheney C, Walega DR, Kohan L, Cohen SP, Cushman DM, McCormick ZL, Conger A. The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopically Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May 1;101(5):482-492. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001813. Epub 2021 May 27.
PMID: 35006653BACKGROUNDHong T, Wang H, Li G, Yao P, Ding Y. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy of Invasive Radiofrequency Treatment for Knee Pain and Function. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 26;2019:9037510. doi: 10.1155/2019/9037510. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31346525BACKGROUNDChoi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PMID: 21055873BACKGROUNDMcCormick ZL, Cohen SP, Walega DR, Kohan L. Technical considerations for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: optimizing outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):518-523. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102117. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
PMID: 33483425BACKGROUNDTran J, Peng PWH, Lam K, Baig E, Agur AMR, Gofeld M. Anatomical Study of the Innervation of Anterior Knee Joint Capsule: Implication for Image-Guided Intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 May;43(4):407-414. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000778.
PMID: 29557887BACKGROUNDFonkoue L, Stoenoiu MS, Behets CW, Steyaert A, Kouassi JK, Detrembleur C, Cornu O. Validation of a new protocol for ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation with accurate anatomical targets: cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Mar;46(3):210-216. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101936. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
PMID: 33273065BACKGROUNDAhmed A, Arora D. Ultrasound-Guided Neurolysis of Six Genicular Nerves for Intractable Pain from Knee Osteoarthritis: A Case Series. Pain Pract. 2019 Jan;19(1):16-26. doi: 10.1111/papr.12710. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
PMID: 29761638BACKGROUNDKoshi E, Meiling JB, Conger AM, McCormick ZL, Burnham TR. Long-term clinical outcomes of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain using a three-tined electrode for expanded nerve capture. Interv Pain Med. 2021 Nov 19;1(1):100003. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2021.100003. eCollection 2022 Mar.
PMID: 39301447BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient will be sedated and positioned so that they will not know which of the two treatments they receive. The outcomes assessor will not know which treatment the patient received, as they will not be present during the procedure. The care provider (if present) will not be told. Only care providers involved in the procedure are unblinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2023
First Posted
July 5, 2023
Study Start
March 9, 2025
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11