NCT04124458

Brief Summary

This is a randomized, double blind, single-center, clinical trial. The study will be conducted over a period of 6 months. The study will be conducted at the Allevio Pain Clinic, Toronto, Canada.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 11, 2019

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2023

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 14, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of life assessment: Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF)

    measured by Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF), between minimum of zero and maximum of ten

    Change from baseline BPI-SF at 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • At Least of 30% decrease in the pain score

    Baseline, every 3 months up to 6 months

  • At Least of 30% decrease in the pain score

    Baseline, every 3 months up to 6 months

  • Quality of life assessment

    Baseline, every 3 months up to 6 months

  • Quality of life assessment: General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD)

    Baseline, every 3 months up to 6 months

  • Quality of life assessment: Patients self-reported perceived duration of effect (PSPDE)

    Baseline, every 3 months up to 6 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In radiofrequency ablation arm, sensory brunch of occipital nerve will be burn with max allowable temperature: 42 degrees Celsius, real temperature: 41 degrees Celsius, power=65 volts, two cycles of 180 second.

Device: Radiofrequency ablation

Bilateral Occipital Nerve Block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm all steps are the same as other arm, except the generator will not be on and patient will have pain relief by injecting numbing medications beside the sensory nerves.

Device: Radiofrequency ablation

Interventions

In radiofrequency ablation arm, sensory brunch of occipital nerve will be burn with max allowable temperature: 42 degrees Celsius, real temperature: 41 degrees Celsius, power=65 volts, two cycles of 180 second.

Bilateral Occipital Nerve BlockPulsed Radiofrequency Ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-90
  • Confirmed diagnosis of occipital headaches, patients with concurrent other types of headaches will not be excluded (except undiagnosed headaches)
  • Duration of occipital headaches \> 3 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English speakers;
  • Refusal to sign informed consent;
  • Allergy to medications which will be used in the study;
  • Concurrent undiagnosed headaches
  • Current brain tumors
  • Current known tumors with known metastasis in other organs
  • Occipital blocks within the last 3 months
  • Currently receiving treatment with Botox for migraine.
  • Patient has RF of occipital nerve/s within the last year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (12)

  • 13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum, 1988.

    BACKGROUND
  • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.

  • Steiner TJ, Paemeleire K, Jensen R, Valade D, Savi L, Lainez MJ, Diener HC, Martelletti P, Couturier EG; European Headache Federation; Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign to Reduce the Burden of Headache Worldwide; World Health Organization. European principles of management of common headache disorders in primary care. J Headache Pain. 2007 Oct;8 Suppl 1:S3-47. doi: 10.1007/s10194-007-0366-y. No abstract available.

  • Stovner Lj, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A, Steiner T, Zwart JA. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x.

  • Ducic I, Felder JM 3rd, Fantus SA. A systematic review of peripheral nerve interventional treatments for chronic headaches. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;72(4):439-45. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000063.

  • Inan N, Inan LE, Coskun O, Tunc T, Ilhan M. Effectiveness of Greater Occipital Nerve Blocks in Migraine Prophylaxis. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2016 Mar;53(1):45-48. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.10003. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

  • Okmen K, Dagistan Y, Dagistan E, Kaplan N, Cancan E. Efficacy of the greater occipital nerve block in recurrent migraine type headaches. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2016;50(3):151-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

  • Hascalovici JR, Robbins MS. Peripheral Nerve Blocks for the Treatment of Headache in Older Adults: A Retrospective Study. Headache. 2017 Jan;57(1):80-86. doi: 10.1111/head.12992. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

  • Kim DD, Sibai N. Prolongation of greater occipital neural blockade with 10% lidocaine neurolysis: a case series of a new technique. J Pain Res. 2016 Sep 29;9:721-725. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S112947. eCollection 2016.

  • Cohen SP, Peterlin BL, Fulton L, Neely ET, Kurihara C, Gupta A, Mali J, Fu DC, Jacobs MB, Plunkett AR, Verdun AJ, Stojanovic MP, Hanling S, Constantinescu O, White RL, McLean BC, Pasquina PF, Zhao Z. Randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study comparing pulsed radiofrequency to steroid injections for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2585-2594. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000373.

  • 11. Cervicogenic headache in Headache and Migraine Biology and Management 2015, Pages 203-212. Cooper W, Masih A.

    RESULT
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Headache

Interventions

Radiofrequency Ablation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Once eligible, the Redcap will assign the patient to one of the study group. Patients and physician provider will be blinded in the proposed study. Study questionnaires will be completed every three months by patients through RedCap System. Provider physician (here Dr.Rahul Shivaji Pathak) is the person who will perform the procedure.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized, double blind, single-center, clinical trial. Participants will be randomly allocated to P-RF or occipital block intervention groups in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated algorithm. The study will be conducted over a period of 6 months, during which patients will make 4 visits (screening, baseline visit (Day 0) and 3, 6 months follow up visits, with ±1-week window). The study will be conducted at the Allevio Pain Clinic, Toronto, Canada. Research Ethics approvals will be sought.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2019

First Posted

October 11, 2019

Study Start

January 2, 2023

Primary Completion

October 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

February 15, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share