NCT05922215

Brief Summary

Intellectual impairment is a developmental condition that first appears in childhood and causes substantial intellectual or cognitive limitations as well as inadequate adaptation to the demands of daily life. It may be viewed as a syndrome grouping (meta-syndrome), rather than as an illness or a disability; encompassing a wide range of clinical problems, including hereditary, viral, metabolic, and neurological issues. Prior to learning new abilities, there is a loss in cognitive functioning that is indicative of ID. Falling is a severe issue that affects people with intellectual disabilities frequently. Although studies based on retrospective data collected over time have not determined the exact prevalence of falling in the ID community, they have estimated that 30-60% of people fall within a 12-month period. Similar fall risk factors exist in the general population and in people with ID, such as advancing age, vision problems, and mobility issues. However, some characteristics, such as having frequent seizures and a high level of ambulation, seem more distinctive to ID. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of balance training on gait and functional strength in children with mild intellectual disabilities. This will be a Randomized Controlled Trial. Approval will be gained from the Ethical committee of the Riphah international university Lahore, Pakistan prior to the commencement of study. Written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and all information and data will be confidential. Subjects will be informed that there is no risk of study and they will be free to withdraw any time during process of study. 22 intellectually disabled children between the ages of 7 and 14 will be randomly allocated to the Experimental group (n=10) or a Control group (n=10). The Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (including stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks. Whereas, the Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that, only Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) will be given at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training. The time up-and-go test, the 10-meter walk test and GMFM-88 were used to evaluate gait, and the Sit-to-stand test and the Stair Climbing test. were used to measure each participant's functional strength. Pre and Post treatment values will be evaluated and the Data will be analyzed using SPSS 22.0.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 27, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 26, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Time Up and Go test

    The Time Up and Go test (TUG) is a quick test that measures balance in both the static and dynamic planes. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees. During the test, the person is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.

    Baseline and 8th week

  • Change in Sit to stand test

    The Sit to stand also known as the 30 Second Chair Stand Test (30CST) is administered to test leg strength and endurance. Equipment: A chair with a straight back without arm rests (seat 17" high), and a stopwatch. Method: The participant is urged to complete as many full stands as they can in the allotted 30 seconds. Between each stand, the person is told to sit down completely. The tester silently counts the completion of each correct stand while keeping an eye on the participant's performance to verify perfect form.

    Baseline and 8th week

  • Change in Stair climb test

    The stair climb test, also known as the stair climb power test, is a field-based evaluation of lower body strength, power, and physical function that is clinically relevant, safe, and affordable. Equipment: Stairs (8 - 14 steps) with handrails, stopwatch. Scoring: Total time to ascend and descend steps is recorded to the nearest 100th of a second. The patient should use the assistive device (if any) normally used to perform the activity at the time of testing.

    baseline and 8th week

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Dynamic Balance trainingOther: Static balance training

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: Static balance training

Interventions

The Experimental group will be given the Baseline treatment comprising of Stretching \& Static balance training (i.e. heel and toe raises, alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) alongside Dynamic Balance training which will include (weight shifting forward, backward, sideward, and diagonally with eyes opened and eyes closed, walking toe-to-heel barefoot, side walking, reverse walking and one-foot jumps), and Progressive activity training (such as stepping over/on obstacles, throwing and catching a ball, and kicking a ball.) for 40 minutes per day, twice each week for 8 weeks.

Experimental Group

The Control group will continue their regular school schedule, which will include participation in physical education activities at the same frequency. Along with that Baseline treatment including Static balance training (i.e. alternate rising of the left and right foot above the floor and tandem standing.) only, at the same intervals and for the same length of time as the intervention group, with the exception of additional Dynamic balance training and progressive activity training.

Control GroupExperimental Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Boys and Girls with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (IQ range 50-69)
  • Age group: 7-14 years
  • Students from a Special Education School

You may not qualify if:

  • CP and Down's syndrome
  • Those who were unable to complete follow-up tests.
  • Subjects who took part in less than 80% of the intervention program.
  • Participants with any psychological or behavioral issues.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rising Sun Institute for special children

Lahore, Punjab Province, 51000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Vuijk PJ, Hartman E, Scherder E, Visscher C. Motor performance of children with mild intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Nov;54(11):955-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01318.x. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

    PMID: 20854287BACKGROUND
  • Wang J, Gao Y, Kwok HHM, Huang WYJ, Li S, Li L. Children with Intellectual Disability Are Vulnerable to Overweight and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study among Chinese Children. Child Obes. 2018 Jul;14(5):316-326. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0015. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

    PMID: 29975552BACKGROUND
  • Stanish HI, Curtin C, Must A, Phillips S, Maslin M, Bandini LG. Physical Activity Enjoyment, Perceived Barriers, and Beliefs Among Adolescents With and Without Intellectual Disabilities. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jan;13(1):102-10. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0548. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

    PMID: 25830443BACKGROUND
  • Maiano C, Hue O, Morin AJS, Lepage G, Tracey D, Moullec G. Exercise interventions to improve balance for young people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Apr;61(4):406-418. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14023. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

    PMID: 30230530BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Fareeha Kausar, PP-DPT

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2023

First Posted

June 28, 2023

Study Start

March 9, 2023

Primary Completion

August 15, 2023

Study Completion

August 30, 2023

Last Updated

December 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations