NCT05920525

Brief Summary

Forty patients with class II division 1 malocclusion who will require extraction of the upper first premolars as a part of the orthodontic treatment plan will be invited to participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: the electrical group and the control group. The en-masse retraction technique will be used to retract the upper anterior teeth using mini-implants as an anchor unit to provide the maximum anchorage and Nickle-Titanium closed coil springs that will be stretched from the mini-implants to the crimpable hooks on the base wire and applied 250 g of force per side. A special removable electrical device will be used to provide electrical stimulation during the retraction phase. The levels of pain and discomfort will be self-reported using a questionnaire with visual analog scales.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 27, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Retraction of upper anterior teethElectrical stimulationCoil springs

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the perception of pain

    Patients will be asked this question about their perception of pain. 'What is the degree of pain accompanying this moment?' Pain is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100-mm line to indicate the level of pain being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no pain (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) pain (VAS=100).

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • Change in the perception of discomfort

    Patients will be asked this question about their perception of discomfort. 'What is the degree of discomfort that accompanies this moment?' Discomfort is assessed by asking the study participant to place a mark on a horizontal 100 mm line to indicate the level of discomfort being experienced. The left end of the line refers to no discomfort (VAS=0), whereas the right end refers to maximum (unimaginable) discomfort (VAS=100).

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in the perception of burning

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • Change in the perception of swelling

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • Change in the chewing ability

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • Change in the speech ability

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • Analgesic consumption

    Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: at the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day of the first, second, and third months from the beginning of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Electrical stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group of patients, retraction of upper anterior teeth will be done using backward traction, and the remodeling will be enhanced by very light electrical stimulation by a specific device.

Device: Electrical stimulation

Traditional retraction of the front teeth

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this group of patients, traditional traction of the front teeth will be employed without any acceleration method.

Procedure: Traditional retraction of the front upper teeth

Interventions

A specific device will be used to stimulate the remodeling procedures in the alveolar bone.

Electrical stimulation

The retraction will be performed using coil springs which will help in moving the anterior teeth backward without the need to employ any additional procedure or device to accelerate this movement.

Traditional retraction of the front teeth

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult healthy patients of both sexes
  • Age range: 17-25 years.
  • Class II Division 1 malocclusion:
  • Mild to moderate skeletal Class II (ANB = 5-7)
  • Protrusion less than 10 mm (5 to 10 mm of overjet)
  • Normal or vertical growth pattern (MM ≥ 26; SN-MP ≥ 33; Y Axis ≥ 65)
  • Dental crowding less than 3 mm
  • The presence of all permanent upper teeth (regardless of third molars).
  • Good oral and periodontal health:
  • Probing depth \< 4 mm
  • No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
  • Gingival index ≤ 1
  • Plaque index ≤ 1

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients with severe skeletal dysplasia in all three dimensions.
  • Patients suffer from systemic diseases or syndromes
  • Patients on medication for systemic disorders, pregnancy, or steroid therapy.
  • Patients showing any signs of active periodontal disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damsacus

Damascus, DM20 HAJ72, Syria

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Roth PM, Thrash WJ. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for controlling pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986 Aug;90(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90045-4.

    PMID: 3488674BACKGROUND
  • Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90222-5.

    PMID: 6243448BACKGROUND
  • Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Al-Sabbagh R, Alam MK, Mahmoud G, Idris G. A Novel Method to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Low-Intensity Direct Electrical Current in Patients Requiring en-Masse Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth: A Preliminary Clinical Report. Cureus. 2023 May 24;15(5):e39438. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39438. eCollection 2023 May.

    PMID: 37234453BACKGROUND
  • Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Mahmoud GA, Almasri IA, Jaber ST, Alam MK. Patient-reported outcomes during accelerating the en-masse retraction of the upper anterior teeth using low-intensity electrical stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2024 May 13;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40510-024-00517-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Interventions

Electric Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical StimulationInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Rashad Ibrahim Shaadouh, DDS

    Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2023

First Posted

June 27, 2023

Study Start

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion

September 15, 2022

Study Completion

May 15, 2023

Last Updated

June 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations