Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aimed to compare the effect of immediate light short Class II elastics versus conventional Class II elastics on the skeletal, dental and soft tissues in patients with Class II malocclusion. Participants with class II malocclusion divided into 2 groups; early group wore immediate light short Class II elastics and conventional group wore conventional Class II elastics on rigid stainless steel arch wires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2024
CompletedJanuary 31, 2024
March 1, 2021
1.9 years
October 30, 2023
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the change of the maxillary incisors inclination
The primary outcome of this study was to compare the effect of early light short elastics versus conventional elastics on the inclination of upper incisors in patients with canine Class II malocclusion. the Sella-Nasion angle was measured " cephalometric radiographic analysis" in degrees. the angle representing the maxillary incisors inclination "S-N angle" was measured before and after treatment by both protocols, then the amount of changes were compared.
from the beginning of the treatment till treatment was done about 15 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
the 3-dimensional effects of early light short Class II elastics versus conventional elastics on dental, skeletal, and soft tissues.
from the beginning of the treatment till treatment was done about 15 months
amount of gingival display during smile
from the beginning of the treatment till treatment was done about 15 months
treatment duration
from the beginning of the treatment till treatment was done about 15 months
Study Arms (2)
1-Early group
EXPERIMENTALfor the early group, patients were instructed to wear immediate light short Class II elastics from upper canines to lower second premolars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours.
2-Conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORfor the conventional group, conventional class II elastics were used on rigid stainless steel arch wires. patients were instructed to wear Class II elastics from upper canines to lower first molars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours.
Interventions
Participants were treated by a fixed orthodontic appliance with intermaxillary class II elastics to correct the class II malocclusion. patients were instructed to wear immediate light short Class II elastics from upper canines to lower second premolars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours.
patients were treated by a fixed orthodontic appliance with intermaxillary Class II elastics. patients were instructed to wear Class II elastics from upper canines to lower first molars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours after reaching to rigid stainless steel arch wires.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Permanent dentition stage with fully erupted permanent teeth (excluding third molars).
- Patients with increased overjet.
- Patients with canine Class II malocclusion.
- Treatment plan involves the use of a pre-adjusted edgewise fixed orthodontic appliance with a non-extraction approach.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a gummy smile.
- Obvious periodontal disease and gingival recession.
- Vulnerable patients (orphans, subjects with mental disorders…. etc.).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, El-Abasaya, 7154411, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2023
First Posted
January 31, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 23, 2023
Study Completion
June 10, 2023
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- no limit