Human Learning of New Structured Information Across Time and Sleep

NCT05910762 | Recruiting

• 2 other identifiers: 833228BR01MH129436
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 105
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Acting adaptively requires quickly picking up on structure in the environment and storing the acquired knowledge for effective future use. Dominant theories of the hippocampus have focused on its ability to encode individual snapshots of experience, but the investigators and others have found evidence that it is also crucial for finding structure across experiences. The mechanisms of this essential form of learning have not been established. The investigators have developed a neural network model of the hippocampus instantiating the theory that one of its subfields can quickly encode structure using distributed representations, a powerful form of representation in which populations of neurons become responsive to multiple related features of the environment. The first aim of this project is to test predictions of this model using high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in paradigms requiring integration of information across experiences. The results will clarify fundamental mechanisms of how humans learn novel structure, adjudicating between existing models of this process, and informing further model development. There are also competing theories as to the eventual fate of new hippocampal representations. One view posits that during sleep, the hippocampus replays recent information to build longer-term distributed representations in neocortex. Another view claims that memories are directly and independently formed and consolidated within the hippocampus and neocortex. The second aim of this project is to test between these theories. The investigators will assess changes in hippocampal and cortical representations over time by re-scanning participants and tracking changes in memory at a one-week delay. Any observed changes in the brain and behavior across time, however, may be due to generic effects of time or to active processing during sleep. The third aim is thus to assess the specific causal contributions of sleep to the consolidation of structured information. The investigators will use real-time sleep electroencephalography to play sound cues to bias memory reactivation. The investigators expect that this work will clarify the anatomical substrates and, critically, the nature of the representations that support encoding and consolidation of novel structure in the environment.

Conditions

Learning; Humans; Consolidation; Sleep

Keywords

memory; sleep; learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Changes in multivariate representations

  Changes in spatial correlations between the MRI BOLD pattern associated with related objects over the course of learning and across the one-week delay.

  Within first session (spanning 2-3 hrs.) and at approximately one week delay in second session (spanning 1-2 hrs.)

• Brain-behavior correlations

  Correlations between BOLD signal in the brain and participant behavior during judgments about objects.

  Within first session (spanning 2-3 hrs.) and at approximately one week delay in second session (spanning 1-2 hrs.)

• Correlations between activity across brain regions

  Relationships between BOLD activity across different regions of the brain as a function of trial type and delay.

  Within first session (spanning 2-3 hrs.) and at approximately one week delay in second session (spanning 1-2 hrs.)

• Memory accuracy

  Change in generalization ability from before to after the nap as a function of the different conditions of object cueing during sleep.

  Within single study session (spanning 4-5 hrs.)

Study Arms (3)

Learning and consolidation in Associative Inference

EXPERIMENTAL

The proposed functional magnetic resonance imaging study assesses the neural representations contributing to humans' ability to associate objects in the support of simple inferences and generalization. All participants will undergo the same procedure. Participants will learn about pairs of objects and then be asked to make judgments and inferences about the relationships between the objects. The order of presentation of the objects will be manipulated within subjects, as different learning theories make different predictions about how learning will unfold under different orderings. Participants will be brought back one week later for a second scan, to evaluate how the neural substrates of these processes change with consolidation.

Behavioral: Associative inference

Learning and consolidation in category learning

EXPERIMENTAL

The proposed functional magnetic resonance imaging study assesses the neural representations contributing to humans' ability to learn new categories of objects. All participants will undergo the same procedure. Participants will learn about novel objects, each with several colored parts. Some parts are unique to individual objects and others are shared among the members of the category. The investigators will assess how different regions of the brain contribute to learning and remembering these different kinds of parts, and how the resulting representations support category understanding. Participants will be brought back one week later for a second scan, to evaluate how the neural substrates of these processes change with consolidation.

Behavioral: Category learning

Manipulating replay during sleep using real-time EEG

EXPERIMENTAL

In the proposed electroencephalography (EEG) study, all participants will undergo the same procedure. Participants will learn the visual features and spoken names associated with three categories of novel objects. Participants' memory for these objects and the objects' parts will be tested before and after a nap. The investigators will monitor brain activity during the nap in real time and, at optimal moments, quietly play the spoken names of the objects to encourage reactivation of particular objects in particular orders. The investigators will assess how this manipulation impacts memory for these objects.

Behavioral: Category learning; Behavioral: Sleep

Interventions

Associative inference BEHAVIORAL

Participants will engage in an associative inference paradigm. Memory will be assessed behaviorally and neural representations will be assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Learning and consolidation in Associative Inference

Category learning BEHAVIORAL

Participants will engage in a category learning paradigm. Memory will be assessed behaviorally (Arms 2 and 3), and neural representations will be assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (Arm 2).

Learning and consolidation in category learning; Manipulating replay during sleep using real-time EEG

Sleep BEHAVIORAL

Participants will sleep after engaging in a category learning paradigm while electroencephalography data are collected, and memory will be assessed behaviorally after sleep.

Manipulating replay during sleep using real-time EEG

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 35 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Between 18 and 35 years of age (all aims)
• Not a member of a vulnerable population (all aims)
• Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (all aims)
• Normal hearing (all aims)
• Able to speak English fluently (all aims)
• No prior history of major psychiatric or neurological disorders (Aims 1 and 2; MRI-specific)
• Not currently taking any antidepressants or sedatives (Aims 1 and 2; MRI-specific)
• No known neurological disorders (Aim 3; EEG-specific)

You may not qualify if:

• The investigators will exclude individuals with MR contraindications such as non-removable biomedical devices or metal in or on the body (Aims 1 and 2; MRI-specific)
• Claustrophobia (Aims 1 and 2; MRI-specific)
• Pregnant women will also be excluded from neuroimaging, as the effects of MR on pregnancy are not fully understood (Aims 1 and 2; MRI-specific)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Pennsylvania: lead
• National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH): collaborator

Study Sites (1)

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (56)

• Schapiro AC, Kustner LV, Turk-Browne NB. Shaping of object representations in the human medial temporal lobe based on temporal regularities. Curr Biol. 2012 Sep 11;22(17):1622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.056. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

  PMID: 22885059 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, Turk-Browne NB, Norman KA, Botvinick MM. Statistical learning of temporal community structure in the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2016 Jan;26(1):3-8. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22523. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

  PMID: 26332666 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, Gregory E, Landau B, McCloskey M, Turk-Browne NB. The necessity of the medial temporal lobe for statistical learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1736-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00578. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

  PMID: 24456393 BACKGROUND

• Covington NV, Brown-Schmidt S, Duff MC. The Necessity of the Hippocampus for Statistical Learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 May;30(5):680-697. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01228. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

  PMID: 29308986 BACKGROUND

• Schlichting ML, Preston AR. Memory integration: neural mechanisms and implications for behavior. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Feb;1:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.005.

  PMID: 25750931 BACKGROUND

• Hinton, GE. Distributed representations. Technical Report CMU-CS-84-157. 1984.

  BACKGROUND

• McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev. 1995 Jul;102(3):419-457. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419.

  PMID: 7624455 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, Turk-Browne NB, Botvinick MM, Norman KA. Complementary learning systems within the hippocampus: a neural network modelling approach to reconciling episodic memory with statistical learning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711):20160049. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0049.

  PMID: 27872368 BACKGROUND

• Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):611-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611.

  PMID: 14599236 BACKGROUND

• Zhou Z, Singh D, Tandoc MC, Schapiro AC. Building integrated representations through interleaved learning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2666-2684. doi: 10.1037/xge0001415. Epub 2023 May 25.

  PMID: 37227843 BACKGROUND

• Kumaran D, McClelland JL. Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: a model of the hippocampal system. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):573-616. doi: 10.1037/a0028681.

  PMID: 22775499 BACKGROUND

• Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C, Ekstrom AD, Wiltgen BJ. A contextual binding theory of episodic memory: systems consolidation reconsidered. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Jun;20(6):364-375. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0150-4.

  PMID: 30872808 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, McDevitt EA, Chen L, Norman KA, Mednick SC, Rogers TT. Sleep Benefits Memory for Semantic Category Structure While Preserving Exemplar-Specific Information. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 1;7(1):14869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12884-5.

  PMID: 29093451 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, McDevitt EA, Rogers TT, Mednick SC, Norman KA. Human hippocampal replay during rest prioritizes weakly learned information and predicts memory performance. Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 25;9(1):3920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06213-1.

  PMID: 30254219 BACKGROUND

• Singh D, Norman KA, Schapiro AC. A model of autonomous interactions between hippocampus and neocortex driving sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2123432119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123432119. Epub 2022 Oct 24.

  PMID: 36279437 BACKGROUND

• Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Summerfield C, Botvinick M. Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence. Neuron. 2017 Jul 19;95(2):245-258. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.011.

  PMID: 28728020 BACKGROUND

• McCloskey M, Cohen NJ. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 1989; 24: 109-165.

  BACKGROUND

• Daw ND, Niv Y, Dayan P. Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11. doi: 10.1038/nn1560. Epub 2005 Nov 6.

  PMID: 16286932 BACKGROUND

• Klinzing JG, Niethard N, Born J. Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nat Neurosci. 2019 Oct;22(10):1598-1610. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0467-3. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

  PMID: 31451802 BACKGROUND

• Leutgeb S, Leutgeb JK, Treves A, Moser MB, Moser EI. Distinct ensemble codes in hippocampal areas CA3 and CA1. Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1295-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1100265. Epub 2004 Jul 22.

  PMID: 15272123 BACKGROUND

• Leutgeb JK, Leutgeb S, Moser MB, Moser EI. Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science. 2007 Feb 16;315(5814):961-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1135801.

  PMID: 17303747 BACKGROUND

• Nakashiba T, Young JZ, McHugh TJ, Buhl DL, Tonegawa S. Transgenic inhibition of synaptic transmission reveals role of CA3 output in hippocampal learning. Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1260-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1151120. Epub 2008 Jan 24.

  PMID: 18218862 BACKGROUND

• Schlichting ML, Preston AR. Hippocampal-medial prefrontal circuit supports memory updating during learning and post-encoding rest. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Oct;134 Pt A(Pt A):91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

  PMID: 26608407 BACKGROUND

• Guise KG, Shapiro ML. Medial Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Memory Interference by Modifying Hippocampal Encoding. Neuron. 2017 Apr 5;94(1):183-192.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

  PMID: 28343868 BACKGROUND

• Eichenbaum H. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Sep;18(9):547-558. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.74. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

  PMID: 28655882 BACKGROUND

• Barker GR, Banks PJ, Scott H, Ralph GS, Mitrophanous KA, Wong LF, Bashir ZI, Uney JB, Warburton EC. Separate elements of episodic memory subserved by distinct hippocampal-prefrontal connections. Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb;20(2):242-250. doi: 10.1038/nn.4472. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

  PMID: 28067902 BACKGROUND

• Wimmer GE, Daw ND, Shohamy D. Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1092-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08017.x.

  PMID: 22487039 BACKGROUND

• Tompary A, Davachi L. Consolidation Promotes the Emergence of Representational Overlap in the Hippocampus and Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron. 2020 Jan 8;105(1):199-200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.020. No abstract available.

  PMID: 31917954 BACKGROUND

• Antony JW, Schapiro AC. Active and effective replay: systems consolidation reconsidered again. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Aug;20(8):506-507. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0191-8. No abstract available.

  PMID: 31160728 BACKGROUND

• Paller KA. Sleeping in a Brave New World: Opportunities for Improving Learning and Clinical Outcomes through Targeted Memory Reactivation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;26(6):532-537. doi: 10.1177/0963721417716928. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

  PMID: 29422722 BACKGROUND

• Armstrong K, Kose S, Williams L, Woolard A, Heckers S. Impaired associative inference in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012 May;38(3):622-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq145. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

  PMID: 21134974 BACKGROUND

• Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Bandettini P. Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci. 2008 Nov 24;2:4. doi: 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008. eCollection 2008.

  PMID: 19104670 BACKGROUND

• Molitor RJ, Sherrill KR, Morton NW, Miller AA, Preston AR. Memory Reactivation during Learning Simultaneously Promotes Dentate Gyrus/CA2,3 Pattern Differentiation and CA1 Memory Integration. J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 27;41(4):726-738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0394-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

  PMID: 33239402 BACKGROUND

• Dimsdale-Zucker HR, Ritchey M, Ekstrom AD, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields. Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 18;9(1):294. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02752-1.

  PMID: 29348512 BACKGROUND

• Schlichting ML, Zeithamova D, Preston AR. CA1 subfield contributions to memory integration and inference. Hippocampus. 2014 Oct;24(10):1248-60. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22310. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

  PMID: 24888442 BACKGROUND

• Shohamy D, Wagner AD. Integrating memories in the human brain: hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events. Neuron. 2008 Oct 23;60(2):378-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.023.

  PMID: 18957228 BACKGROUND

• Zeithamova D, Schlichting ML, Preston AR. The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 26;6:70. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00070. eCollection 2012.

  PMID: 22470333 BACKGROUND

• Schlichting ML, Mumford JA, Preston AR. Learning-related representational changes reveal dissociable integration and separation signatures in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 25;6:8151. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9151.

  PMID: 26303198 BACKGROUND

• Schapiro AC, Rogers TT, Cordova NI, Turk-Browne NB, Botvinick MM. Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure. Nat Neurosci. 2013 Apr;16(4):486-92. doi: 10.1038/nn.3331. Epub 2013 Feb 17.

  PMID: 23416451 BACKGROUND

• Tompary A, Al-Aidroos N, Turk-Browne NB. Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep;30(9):1281-1297. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01284. Epub 2018 May 23.

  PMID: 29791296 BACKGROUND

• Carr VA, Rissman J, Wagner AD. Imaging the human medial temporal lobe with high-resolution fMRI. Neuron. 2010 Feb 11;65(3):298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.022.

  PMID: 20159444 BACKGROUND

• Poppenk J, Evensmoen HR, Moscovitch M, Nadel L. Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 May;17(5):230-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

  PMID: 23597720 BACKGROUND

• Mack ML, Love BC, Preston AR. Building concepts one episode at a time: The hippocampus and concept formation. Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jul 27;680:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

  PMID: 28801273 BACKGROUND

• Chanales AJH, Tremblay-McGaw AG, Drascher ML, Kuhl BA. Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity. Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):705-720. doi: 10.1177/0956797620972490. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

  PMID: 33882251 BACKGROUND

• Miner AE, Schurgin MW, Brady TF. Is working memory inherently more "precise" than long-term memory? Extremely high fidelity visual long-term memories for frequently encountered objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Aug;46(8):813-830. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000748. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

  PMID: 32324030 BACKGROUND

• Zhao Y, Chanales AJH, Kuhl BA. Adaptive Memory Distortions Are Predicted by Feature Representations in Parietal Cortex. J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 31;41(13):3014-3024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2875-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

  PMID: 33619210 BACKGROUND

• Ashby FG, Maddox WT. Human category learning 2.0. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224:147-161. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05874.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

  PMID: 21182535 BACKGROUND

• Bowman CR, Iwashita T, Zeithamova D. Tracking prototype and exemplar representations in the brain across learning. Elife. 2020 Nov 26;9:e59360. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59360.

  PMID: 33241999 BACKGROUND

• Margalit E, Biederman I, Tjan BS, Shah MP. What Is Actually Affected by the Scrambling of Objects When Localizing the Lateral Occipital Complex? J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1595-1604. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01144. Epub 2017 May 11.

  PMID: 28493807 BACKGROUND

• Rogers TT, Hocking J, Noppeney U, Mechelli A, Gorno-Tempini ML, Patterson K, Price CJ. Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Sep;6(3):201-13. doi: 10.3758/cabn.6.3.201.

  PMID: 17243356 BACKGROUND

• Hu X, Cheng LY, Chiu MH, Paller KA. Promoting memory consolidation during sleep: A meta-analysis of targeted memory reactivation. Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;146(3):218-244. doi: 10.1037/bul0000223.

  PMID: 32027149 BACKGROUND

• Landmann N, Kuhn M, Piosczyk H, Feige B, Baglioni C, Spiegelhalder K, Frase L, Riemann D, Sterr A, Nissen C. The reorganisation of memory during sleep. Sleep Med Rev. 2014 Dec;18(6):531-41. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

  PMID: 24813468 BACKGROUND

• Goldi M, van Poppel EAM, Rasch B, Schreiner T. Increased neuronal signatures of targeted memory reactivation during slow-wave up states. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39178-2.

  PMID: 30804371 BACKGROUND

• Cairney SA, Guttesen AAV, El Marj N, Staresina BP. Memory Consolidation Is Linked to Spindle-Mediated Information Processing during Sleep. Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 19;28(6):948-954.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.087. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

  PMID: 29526594 BACKGROUND

• Whitmore NW, Bassard AM, Paller KA. Targeted memory reactivation of face-name learning depends on ample and undisturbed slow-wave sleep. NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 Jan 12;7(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41539-021-00119-2.

  PMID: 35022449 BACKGROUND

• Norman KA, Newman EL, Perotte AJ. Methods for reducing interference in the Complementary Learning Systems model: oscillating inhibition and autonomous memory rehearsal. Neural Netw. 2005 Nov;18(9):1212-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

  PMID: 16260116 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Sleep

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nervous System Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

• Anna C Schapiro, PhD

  University of Pennsylvania

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Anna C Schapiro, PhD

CONTACT

6177974555; aschapir@sas.upenn.edu

Rishi Krishnamurthy, BA

CONTACT

4255050841; rishikr@sas.upenn.edu

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: BASIC SCIENCE
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 10, 2023
• First Posted: June 20, 2023
• Study Start: June 5, 2023
• Primary Completion (Estimated): March 1, 2028
• Study Completion (Estimated): March 1, 2028
• Last Updated: August 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Time Frame: IPD will be available at the time of study publication.
• Access Criteria: IPD will be publicly available without restriction.

Locations

US (1)