Management of Sepsis in Resource Limited Settings Using a Delphi Method.
Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Sepsis in Resource Limited Settings Using a Delphi Method
1 other identifier
observational
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rapid evolution of sepsis syndromes means that timely diagnosis and treatment are critical in improving outcomes but this may be difficult to achieve in many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) and there is a lack of high quality clinical evidence to guide diagnosis and management in LMIC settings. The wide variability in health systems in LMICs means that additional areas of guidance may be required where staff or facilities are lacking. In the absence of clinical data, to address some of these issues, the investigators aim to use Delphi methodology to obtain experts consensus statements on some specific aspects of sepsis management in LMICs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2023
CompletedJanuary 19, 2024
January 1, 2024
3 months
May 19, 2023
January 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus
Descriptive analysis of questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus. Consensus will be defined as \>70% participants in favour of agree/disagree statements (Likert scale 1-3 means disagree or 5-7 means agree), or \>80% in favour of single option in a single stem question with multiple responses (yes/no answers).
2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Expert group
1. Clinical expertise in adult sepsis management, AND 2. Demonstrated involvement with sepsis related research, educations, policy/protocols, professional activities
Interventions
Multiple rounds of surveys collecting information on sepsis diagnosis and management in resource-limited settings.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants will be recognized experts meeting pre-defined criteria from a wide geographical distribution with approximately 70% from LMICs
You may qualify if:
- Recognized experts meeting pre-defined criteria (below) from a wide geographical distribution with approximately 70% from LMICs.
- Clinical expertise in adult sepsis management, AND
- Demonstrated involvement with sepsis related research, educations, policy/protocols, professional activities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brett Abbenbroek, BSc,MPH,PhD
The George Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2023
First Posted
June 18, 2023
Study Start
May 16, 2023
Primary Completion
August 21, 2023
Study Completion
September 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share