Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam or Aztreonam/Nacubactam Compared to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Subjects With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections or Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis
Integral-1
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime/Nacubactam or Aztreonam/Nacubactam Compared to Imipenem/Cilastatin in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections or Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis, in Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
614
9 countries
61
Brief Summary
Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime/nacubactam or aztreonam/nacubactam compared to imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) or acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started May 2023
61 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 25, 2025
CompletedDecember 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.5 years
April 25, 2023
November 12, 2025
December 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Composite Clinical and Microbiological Success at TOC (Test of Cure Visit) in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-MITT) Population
Composite clinical and microbiological success is defined as the composite clinical outcome of cure and the microbiological outcome of eradication.
TOC (Test of Cure visit): 7 [±2] days after EOT (end of treatment) [Day 10 to 23 after the start of treatment]
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Composite Clinical and Microbiological Outcome
Outcome measurements were assessed at various visits: EA (Earlly Assessment): Day4, EOT (End of Treatment): Day5 to Day14, TOC (Test of Cure visit): Day10 to Day 23, FUP (Follow-Up visit): Day17 to Day30
Proportion of Patients With a Clinical Outcome of Cure
Outcome measurements were assessed at various visits: EA (Earlly Assessment): Day4, EOT (End of Treatment): Day5 to Day14, TOC (Test of Cure visit): Day10 to Day 23, FUP (Follow-Up visit): Day17 to Day30
Proportion of Patients With a Microbiological Outcome of Eradication
Outcome measurements were assessed at various visits: EA (Earlly Assessment): Day4, EOT (End of Treatment): Day5 to Day14, TOC (Test of Cure visit): Day10 to Day 23, FUP (Follow-Up visit): Day17 to Day30
Proportion of Patients With a Clinical Outcome of Cure at TOC in Patients With Secondary Bacteremia at Baseline
TOC (Test of Cure visit): Day 10 to Day 23 after the start of treatment
Proportion of Patients With a Microbiological Outcome of Eradication at TOC in Patients With Secondary Bacteremia at Baseline
TOC (Test of Cure visit): Day 10 to Day 23 after the start of treatment
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
co-administration of cefepime and nacubactam
EXPERIMENTALco-administration of 2 g cefepime and 1 g nacubactam q8h (60 min. infusion)
co-administration of aztreonam and nacubactam
EXPERIMENTALco-administration of 2 g aztreonam and 1 g nacubactam q8h (60 min. infusion)
imipenem/cilastatin
ACTIVE COMPARATORcombination of 1 g imipenem/1 g cilastatin q8h (60 min. infusion)
Interventions
2 g cefepime and 1 g nacubactam
2 g aztreonama and 1 g nacubactam
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patients at least18 years of age (or age of legal consent, whichever is older) at the time of obtaining informed consent and who can be hospitalized throughout the Treatment Period;
- Weight at most 140 kg;
- Expectation, in the opinion of the Investigator, that the patient's cUTI or AP will require treatment with at least 5 days of IV antibiotics;
You may not qualify if:
- Has a known imipenem- and/or meropenem-resistant Gram-negative uropathogen (at least 10\^5 CFU/mL), isolated from study-qualifying urine culture; Note: If after randomization the susceptibility testing indicates resistance to imipenem and/or meropenem, the patient may remain on the study drug at the Investigator's discretion.
- Has known or suspected single or concurrent infection with Acinetobacter spp. or other organisms that are not adequately covered by the study drug (eg, concurrent viral, mycobacterial, or fungal infection) and needs to be managed with other anti-infectives; Note: Patients with qualifying pathogen coinfected with a Gram-positive pathogen may be administered narrow spectrum, open-label glycopeptide (eg, vancomycin), oxazolidinone (eg, linezolid), or daptomycin concomitantly with the study drug at the Investigator's discretion.
- Has only a known Gram-positive primary uropathogen (at least 10\^5 CFU/mL), isolated from study qualifying urine culture;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (61)
Meiji Research Site
Pleven, Bulgaria
Meiji Research Site
Rousse, Bulgaria
Meiji Research Site
Silistra, Bulgaria
Meiji Research Site
Sofia, Bulgaria
Meiji Research Site
Beijing, China
Meiji Research Site
Changchun, China
Meiji Research Site
Chongqing, China
Meiji Research Site
Fuyang, China
Meiji Research Site
Ganzhou, China
Meiji Research Site
Huaian, China
Meiji Research Site
Huzhou, China
Meiji Research Site
Nanchang, China
Meiji Research Site
Nanning, China
Meiji Research Site
Quanzhou, China
Meiji Research Site
Shanghai, China
Meiji Research Site
Shantou, China
Meiji Research Site
Shijiazhuang, China
Meiji Research Site
Taian, China
Meiji Research Site
Tianjin, China
Meiji Research Site
Xuancheng, China
Meiji Research Site
Yunnan, China
Meiji Research Site
Zhejiang, China
Meiji Research Site
Zhengzhou, China
Meiji Research Site
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Meiji Research Site
Liberec, Czechia
Meiji Research Site
Prague, Czechia
Meiji Research Site
Ústí nad Labem, Czechia
Meiji Research Site
Meegomäe, Võrumaa, Estonia
Meiji Research Site
Kohtla-Järve, Estonia
Meiji Research Site
Tallinn, Estonia
Meiji Research Site
Tartu, Estonia
Meiji Research Site
Kutaisi, Georgia
Meiji Research Site
Rustavi, Georgia
Meiji Research Site
Tbilisi, Georgia
Meiji Research Site
Fukuyama, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Gifu, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Ibaraki-Town, Higashiibaraki-County, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Iwakuni, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Kanazawa, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Kawachi-Nagano, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Kofu, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Kumamoto, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Matsumoto, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Mizumaki-Town, Onga-County, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Nagasaki, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Nankoku, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Ōita, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Ōtake, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Sagamihara, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Sapporo, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Shinjuku-ku, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Toyota, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Ueda, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Yokohama, Japan
Meiji Research Site
Riga, Latvia
Meiji Research Site
Valmiera, Latvia
Meiji Research Site
Kaunas, Lithuania
Meiji Research Site
Vilnius, Lithuania
Meiji Research Site
Galanta, Slovakia
Meiji Research Site
Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia
Meiji Research Site
Svidník, Slovakia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The analysis plan included subgroup analyses by pathogen for some secondary endpoints. However, there were a large number of pathogen types, most of which were rare and sparsely represented in the dataset. Therefore, we present the results of subgroup analyses for only the two most frequent pathogens, as analyses for the others were considered statistically unreliable and clinically uninformative.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Meiji Seika Pharma Clinical Trial Administrator
- Organization
- Clinical Development Department
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2023
First Posted
June 5, 2023
Study Start
May 23, 2023
Primary Completion
November 22, 2024
Study Completion
November 26, 2024
Last Updated
December 24, 2025
Results First Posted
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11