NCT05886400

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of visual and auditory distractions on SCAT5 scores. The study is designed to identify the effects of about 80 participants completing the SCAT5 in college-aged athletes. All participants will perform the same tasks in two settings (distracted and non-distracted). The central hypothesis is that there will be a significant association between distractions and a lower score on the SCAT5. The cognitive screening, neurological screen, and mBESS should showcase a decrease scores during the distracted environment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 23, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 21, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Standardized Concussion Assessment ToolModified Balance Error Scoring SystemSports Participation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Significant association between visual and auditory distractions and the outcomes of the Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) assessment

    Scores on the SCAT6 will differ between the control and non-distracted environment. Specifically for the main portion of the SCAT6 the orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed recall scores will be compiled. Scores can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 50. A higher score indicates better performance while a lower score indicates worse performance.

    Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Symptom list

    Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.

  • Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS)

    Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.

Study Arms (2)

Distracted

EXPERIMENTAL

Visual and audio distraction via sports video clips or a game will be playing during the testing session.

Other: SCAT6Other: Visual/ Auditory Distraction

Not Distracted

SHAM COMPARATOR

No visual or auditory distractions will be used during testing session. Testing area will be in a controlled environment.

Other: SCAT6

Interventions

SCAT6OTHER

The SCAT6 is a standardized assessment tool to diagnose a concussion. This tool will be used for the experiment utilizing the 6th edition to recreate the methods used in an athletic situation. The SCAT6 is broken down into multiple subtests to focus on specific aspects of a person's wellbeing that could be affected by a possible concussion. The assessments are created to measure an athlete's subjectively experienced symptoms, cognitive functioning and balance and postural stability (mBESS).

Also known as: Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool
DistractedNot Distracted

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental distractions on one's ability to complete the SCAT6. The environmental distractions will be visual and auditory by playing a sports event or sports clips during the completion of the assessment. The goal of this is to simulate the distraction of a sideline like a SCAT6 is typically used within athletic training.

Distracted

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Previous athletic experience beginning at or after the age of 12

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with a neurological condition (including epilepsy, stroke, seizures)
  • Have had a concussion within the past 6 months (diagnosed or undiagnosed)
  • have not participated in sport

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University School of Public Health

Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.

    PMID: 28301451BACKGROUND
  • Laker SR. Epidemiology of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10 Suppl 2):S354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.07.017.

    PMID: 22035677BACKGROUND
  • McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Molloy M, Cantu R. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. J Athl Train. 2009 Jul-Aug;44(4):434-48. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.4.434. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19593427BACKGROUND
  • Teel EF, Register-Mihalik JK, Appelbaum LG, Battaglini CL, Carneiro KA, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Mihalik JP. Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Aerobic Training and Common Sport-Related Concussion Outcomes in Healthy Participants. J Athl Train. 2018 Dec;53(12):1156-1165. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-7-18. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

    PMID: 30562056BACKGROUND
  • Hanninen T, Parkkari J, Howell DR, Palola V, Seppanen A, Tuominen M, Iverson GL, Luoto TM. Reliability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 baseline testing: A 2-week test-retest study. J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Feb;24(2):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

    PMID: 32868203BACKGROUND
  • Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P, Davis GA, Putukian M, Leddy J, Makdissi M, Sullivan SJ, Broglio SP, Raftery M, Schneider K, Kissick J, McCrea M, Dvorak J, Sills AK, Aubry M, Engebretsen L, Loosemore M, Fuller G, Kutcher J, Ellenbogen R, Guskiewicz K, Patricios J, Herring S. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5): Background and rationale. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):848-850. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097506. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

    PMID: 28446453BACKGROUND
  • Yengo-Kahn AM, Hale AT, Zalneraitis BH, Zuckerman SL, Sills AK, Solomon GS. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15611.

    PMID: 27032923BACKGROUND
  • Black AM, Miutz LN, Kv VW, Schneider KJ, Yeates KO, Emery CA. Baseline Performance of High School Rugby Players on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5. J Athl Train. 2020 Feb;55(2):116-123. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-123-19. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

    PMID: 31917599BACKGROUND
  • Iverson GL, Howell DR, Van Patten R, Bloomfield P, Gardner AJ. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5): Normative Reference Values for the National Rugby League Women's Premiership. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 May 26;3:653743. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.653743. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34124655BACKGROUND
  • Petit KM, Savage JL, Bretzin AC, Anderson M, Covassin T. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5): Baseline Assessments in NCAA Division I Collegiate Student-Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Aug 1;13(3):1143-1155. doi: 10.70252/SUJD2658. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32922635BACKGROUND
  • Bland DC, Zampieri C, Damiano DL. Effectiveness of physical therapy for improving gait and balance in individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2011;25(7-8):664-79. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.576306. Epub 2011 May 11.

    PMID: 21561297BACKGROUND
  • Dessy AM, Yuk FJ, Maniya AY, Gometz A, Rasouli JJ, Lovell MR, Choudhri TF. Review of Assessment Scales for Diagnosing and Monitoring Sports-related Concussion. Cureus. 2017 Dec 7;9(12):e1922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1922.

    PMID: 29456902BACKGROUND
  • West TA, Marion DW. Current recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of concussion in sport: a comparison of three new guidelines. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jan 15;31(2):159-68. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3031. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

    PMID: 23879529BACKGROUND
  • Mistry DA, Rainer TH. Concussion assessment in the emergency department: a preliminary study for a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Dec 27;4(1):e000445. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000445. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30687512BACKGROUND
  • Lempke LB, Schmidt JD, Lynall RC. Athletic Trainers' Concussion-Assessment and Concussion-Management Practices: An Update. J Athl Train. 2020 Jan;55(1):17-26. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-322-18. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

    PMID: 31855075BACKGROUND
  • Shanley E, Thigpen CA, Chapman CG, Thorpe J, Gilliland RG, Sease WF. Athletic Trainers' Effect on Population Health: Improving Access to and Quality of Care. J Athl Train. 2019 Feb;54(2):124-132. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-219-17. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

    PMID: 30461294BACKGROUND
  • Starling AJ, Leong DF, Bogle JM, Vargas BB. Variability of the modified Balance Error Scoring System at baseline using objective and subjective balance measures. Concussion. 2015 Aug 6;1(1):CNC5. doi: 10.2217/cnc.15.5. eCollection 2016 Mar.

    PMID: 30202550BACKGROUND
  • Guskiewicz KM. Balance assessment in the management of sport-related concussion. Clin Sports Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):89-102, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2010.09.004.

    PMID: 21074084BACKGROUND
  • Ruhe A, Fejer R, Gansslen A, Klein W. Assessing postural stability in the concussed athlete: what to do, what to expect, and when. Sports Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):427-33. doi: 10.1177/1941738114541238.

    PMID: 25177420BACKGROUND
  • Bell DR, Guskiewicz KM, Clark MA, Padua DA. Systematic review of the balance error scoring system. Sports Health. 2011 May;3(3):287-95. doi: 10.1177/1941738111403122.

    PMID: 23016020BACKGROUND
  • Quatman-Yates C, Hugentobler J, Ammon R, Mwase N, Kurowski B, Myer GD. The utility of the balance error scoring system for mild brain injury assessments in children and adolescents. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep;42(3):32-8. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.09.2073.

    PMID: 25295764BACKGROUND
  • Silverberg ND, Iaccarino MA, Panenka WJ, Iverson GL, McCulloch KL, Dams-O'Connor K, Reed N, McCrea M; American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group Mild TBI Task Force. Management of Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Synthesis of Practice Guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb;101(2):382-393. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.179. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

    PMID: 31654620BACKGROUND
  • Broglio SP, Cantu RC, Gioia GA, Guskiewicz KM, Kutcher J, Palm M, Valovich McLeod TC; National Athletic Trainer's Association. National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sport concussion. J Athl Train. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):245-65. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.07. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

    PMID: 24601910BACKGROUND
  • King D, Brughelli M, Hume P, Gissane C. Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review. Sports Med. 2014 Apr;44(4):449-71. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0134-x.

    PMID: 24403125BACKGROUND
  • Scorza KA, Cole W. Current Concepts in Concussion: Initial Evaluation and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Apr 1;99(7):426-434.

    PMID: 30932451BACKGROUND
  • Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M, Guskiewicz KM, Halstead M, Herring SA, Kutcher JS, Pana A, Putukian M, Roberts WO. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941.

    PMID: 23243113BACKGROUND
  • Miller PC, Hall EE, Bailey EK. The Influence of Various Distraction Stimuli on Affective Responses during Recumbent Cycle Ergometry. Sports (Basel). 2016 Mar 23;4(2):21. doi: 10.3390/sports4020021.

    PMID: 29910269BACKGROUND
  • Flanagan SR. Invited Commentary on "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Report to Congress: Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;96(10):1753-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

    PMID: 26184889BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Concussion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBrain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemHead Injuries, ClosedWounds and InjuriesWounds, Nonpenetrating

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2023

First Posted

June 2, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion

May 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 1, 2024

Last Updated

June 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All study data will be included in publications.

Locations