NCT05875571

Brief Summary

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a popular form of long-acting reversible contraception, with a high efficacy rate and few side effects. The insertion procedure for IUDs can be uncomfortable and painful. Sedation may be needed to improve patient comfort. The use of IUDs is increasing in the adolescent population, but perceived pain is a barrier to placement. Propofol is a commonly used agent for pediatric procedural sedation, but it has no analgesic properties. Ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been shown to reduce pain in adults and improve patient satisfaction when used prior to IUD placement.. The current study aims to determine if ketorolac, given in combination with propofol for IUD placement in adolescents, can improve comfort during placement and reduce pain following the procedure. Enrolled patients will receive ketorolac or placebo, in addition to propofol, for IUD placement. By comparing the outcomes of these two groups of patients, we can gain a better understanding of the optimal approach to sedation for IUD insertion in adolescents.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 5, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of Post procedural pain after IUD placement

    The primary outcome will be comparison of post-procedural pain using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale in ketorolac vs placebo group. The scale ranges from 0 to10 where 0 = no pain at all and 10= worst pain ever. Lower score indicates improvement in pain while a higher score indicates worsening of pain.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • number of propofol boluses required during sedation

    24 hours

  • total propofol dose (mg/kg) given in each group

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Ketorolac

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group of patients will receive IV Ketorolac before placement of IUD under sedation.

Drug: Ketorolac

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The group of patients will receive placebo before placement of IUD under sedation.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Patients will get IV ketorolac during IUD placement under sedation

Also known as: toradol
Ketorolac

Patients will get IV placebo during IUD placement under sedation

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 21 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale adolescent patients undergoing IUD placement
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients requiring sedated IUD placement at Arkansas Children's Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to ketorolac or other NDSAID
  • Known history of renal impairment
  • History of GI bleeding of peptic ulcer disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Arkansas Childrens Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Jatlaoui TC, Riley HEM, Curtis KM. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review. Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):17-39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

    PMID: 27771475BACKGROUND
  • Hall AM, Kutler BA. Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a prospective survey. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101046. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

    PMID: 25854550BACKGROUND
  • Lambert T, Truong T, Gray B. Pain perception with cervical tenaculum placement during intrauterine device insertion: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr;46(2):126-131. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200376. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

    PMID: 31666302BACKGROUND
  • Panichyawat N, Mongkornthong T, Wongwananuruk T, Sirimai K. 10% lidocaine spray for pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Jul;47(3):159-165. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200670. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

    PMID: 32591417BACKGROUND
  • Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790.

    PMID: 30095776BACKGROUND
  • Ngo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912.

    PMID: 26241253BACKGROUND
  • Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

    PMID: 28826645BACKGROUND
  • Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

    PMID: 29321111BACKGROUND
  • Chaves IA, Baeta T, Dolabella GB, Barbosa LR, Almeida NM, Oliveira FR, Oliveira EC, L Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Pain scores at the insertion of the 52 MG levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system among nulligravidas and parous women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Oct;26(5):399-403. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1925882. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

    PMID: 34096433BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

KetorolacKetorolac Tromethamine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

IndomethacinIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Central Study Contacts

Shahwar Yousuf, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The provider and participant will be masked and will not know if the patient is getting the study drug or placebo
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Pediatric Critical Care Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2023

First Posted

May 25, 2023

Study Start

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 31, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations