Oral Ketorolac for IUD Pain Reduction
Timing of Oral Ketorolac for Pain Reduction in IUD Insertion: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if oral ketorolac given at different timepoints prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion influences pain experienced during this procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
May 30, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.1 years
February 24, 2025
May 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
To compare the mean VAS pain scores between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure). To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints. The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain. The VAS scores will be reported as means and compared via repeated measure ANOVA test yielding confidence intervals and p-values and to assess for significance.
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion, controlling for parity
Parity is recorded during intake 1 week prior to IUD. VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
Difference in rate of "severe pain" (VAS pain scores 70-100mm) between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
Difference in rate of change of VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
Difference in rate of acceptable pain levels between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion
All PASS responses will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards
Study Arms (3)
K2 - Ketorolac 2-hour
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives Ketorolac 20mg PO at 2 hours prior and placebo at 1 hour prior to IUD
K1 - Ketorolac 1-hour
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceives placebo at 2 hours and Ketorolac 20mg PO at 1 hour prior to IUD
K0 - Placebo control
PLACEBO COMPARATORReceives placebo at 2 hours and at 1 hour prior to IUD
Interventions
The experimental condition to be examined by this study is the timing of administration of ketorolac prior to IUD insertion. Ketorolac 20mg PO has proven beneficial at certain timepoints during IUD insertion in prior studies, but pharmacokinetics indicate that it could require more time until peak analgesia.
Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Able to consent
- Desires IUD insertion
You may not qualify if:
- IUD placement under sedation or oral anxiolytic
- IUD replacement (removal with insertion)
- Daily narcotic or NSAID use
- Contraindications to IUD placement
- Current: pregnancy, genital/pelvic infection
- Lifetime history: uterine anomaly, pelvic inflammatory disease, allergy to levonorgestrel or copper
- Contraindications to ketorolac
- Current: weight under 50 kilograms
- Lifetime history: allergy to NSAIDs, liver disease, renal disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina - Hillsborough Campus
Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278, United States
Related Publications (8)
Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PMID: 28826645BACKGROUNDNgo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912.
PMID: 26241253BACKGROUNDde Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z.
PMID: 34715839BACKGROUNDNgo LL, Braaten KP, Eichen E, Fortin J, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Naproxen Sodium for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001746.
PMID: 27824753BACKGROUNDBednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT; Post-Aspiration IUD Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
PMID: 25487172BACKGROUNDReeves JA, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK. Intrauterine Device Training, Attitudes, and Practices Among U.S. Health Care Providers: Findings from a Nationwide Survey. Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
PMID: 36123229BACKGROUNDAkintomide H, Brima N, Sewell RD, Stephenson JM. Patients' experiences and providers' observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20(4):319-26. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1031885. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
PMID: 25857221BACKGROUNDRahman M, King C, Saikaly R, Sosa M, Sibaja K, Tran B, Tran S, Morello P, Yeon Seo S, Yeon Seo Y, Jacobs RJ. Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PMID: 38586685BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy G Bryant, M.D.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2025
First Posted
February 28, 2025
Study Start
May 23, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.