NCT06853327

Brief Summary

To determine if oral ketorolac given at different timepoints prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion influences pain experienced during this procedure.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
1mo left

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress87%
May 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 23, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 30, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

February 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

IUDIntrauterine DeviceKetorolacIUD painNSAIDNon-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory DrugVASPASS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion

    To compare the mean VAS pain scores between study arms (K2 vs K1 vs K0) at each timepoint during and after IUD insertion (pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, PCB injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure). To assess VAS scores, a 100mm ruler will be presented to the patient at the listed timepoints. The patient will adjust a slider on the ruler to correspond to their pain level, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing worst possible pain. The VAS scores will be reported as means and compared via repeated measure ANOVA test yielding confidence intervals and p-values and to assess for significance.

    All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion, controlling for parity

    Parity is recorded during intake 1 week prior to IUD. VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards

  • Difference in rate of "severe pain" (VAS pain scores 70-100mm) between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion

    All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards

  • Difference in rate of change of VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion

    All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards

  • Difference in rate of acceptable pain levels between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion

    All PASS responses will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards

Study Arms (3)

K2 - Ketorolac 2-hour

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receives Ketorolac 20mg PO at 2 hours prior and placebo at 1 hour prior to IUD

Drug: KetorolacDrug: Placebo

K1 - Ketorolac 1-hour

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receives placebo at 2 hours and Ketorolac 20mg PO at 1 hour prior to IUD

Drug: KetorolacDrug: Placebo

K0 - Placebo control

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Receives placebo at 2 hours and at 1 hour prior to IUD

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

The experimental condition to be examined by this study is the timing of administration of ketorolac prior to IUD insertion. Ketorolac 20mg PO has proven beneficial at certain timepoints during IUD insertion in prior studies, but pharmacokinetics indicate that it could require more time until peak analgesia.

Also known as: Toradol
K1 - Ketorolac 1-hourK2 - Ketorolac 2-hour

Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens

K0 - Placebo controlK1 - Ketorolac 1-hourK2 - Ketorolac 2-hour

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Able to consent
  • Desires IUD insertion

You may not qualify if:

  • IUD placement under sedation or oral anxiolytic
  • IUD replacement (removal with insertion)
  • Daily narcotic or NSAID use
  • Contraindications to IUD placement
  • Current: pregnancy, genital/pelvic infection
  • Lifetime history: uterine anomaly, pelvic inflammatory disease, allergy to levonorgestrel or copper
  • Contraindications to ketorolac
  • Current: weight under 50 kilograms
  • Lifetime history: allergy to NSAIDs, liver disease, renal disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina - Hillsborough Campus

Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

    PMID: 28826645BACKGROUND
  • Ngo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912.

    PMID: 26241253BACKGROUND
  • de Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z.

    PMID: 34715839BACKGROUND
  • Ngo LL, Braaten KP, Eichen E, Fortin J, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Naproxen Sodium for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001746.

    PMID: 27824753BACKGROUND
  • Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT; Post-Aspiration IUD Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

    PMID: 25487172BACKGROUND
  • Reeves JA, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK. Intrauterine Device Training, Attitudes, and Practices Among U.S. Health Care Providers: Findings from a Nationwide Survey. Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

    PMID: 36123229BACKGROUND
  • Akintomide H, Brima N, Sewell RD, Stephenson JM. Patients' experiences and providers' observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20(4):319-26. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1031885. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

    PMID: 25857221BACKGROUND
  • Rahman M, King C, Saikaly R, Sosa M, Sibaja K, Tran B, Tran S, Morello P, Yeon Seo S, Yeon Seo Y, Jacobs RJ. Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar.

    PMID: 38586685BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

KetorolacKetorolac Tromethamine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

IndomethacinIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Amy G Bryant, M.D.

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Posted

February 28, 2025

Study Start

May 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
beginning 9 and continuing for 36 months after publication
Access Criteria
Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
More information

Locations