Clinical Study of a Micro-Implantable Pulse Generator for the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (COMFORT 2)
COMFORT 2
Clinical Study Of a Micro-Implantable Pulse Generator For The Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (COMFORT 2)
1 other identifier
interventional
185
1 country
17
Brief Summary
This post market study is being conducted to document the comparative effectiveness and safety of peripheral nerve stimulation plus conventional medical management versus conventional medical management alone in the treatment of chronic, intractable peripheral neuralgia of post-traumatic or postsurgical origin. This is a prospective, minimal risk, multi-center, randomized control trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
ExpectedMarch 4, 2026
July 1, 2025
2 years
May 1, 2023
March 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Effectiveness: Responder Rates between the 2 groups
Difference in responder rates between groups. Responder rate is defined as the percent of subjects with 50% or greater pain relief from baseline, based on the Numeric Rating Scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)
3-months
Safety: Rate of serious and non-serious device effects
Rate of serious and non-serious adverse device events between groups
3-months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Responder Rates
6-months,12 months, 24 months and 36-months
Functional Outcomes: Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to protocol defined timepoints
3 months, 6-months,12 months, 24 months and 36-months
Functional Outcomes: Change in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score from baseline
3 months, 6-months,12 months, 24 months and 36-months
Functional Outcomes: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
3 months, 6-months,12 months, 24 months and 36-months
Safety Assessment
6-months,12 months, 24 months and 36-months
Study Arms (2)
PNS Therapy plus Conventional Medical Management (CMM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this arm will receive a peripheral nerve stimulator and conventional medical management
Conventional Medical Management
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will receive only CMM
Interventions
The Nalu Neurostimulation System for PNS is a peripheral nerve stimulator
Conventional Medical Management is the best standard of care treatment for the patient
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is between 18 to 80 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- Subject would have been prescribed PNS therapy regardless of participation in this study; the use of the Nalu device must be on-label.
- Subject has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions listed below in the low back, shoulder, knee, or foot (including ankle):
- Post-surgical/post-traumatic peripheral neuralgia including but not limited to pain due to peripheral nerve injury, post-surgical scar formation, nerve entrapment
- Mononeuropathy, specified or unspecified or in diseases classified elsewhere
- Other neuralgia or neuropathic pain
- Osteoarthritic pain
- Subject has chronic (defined as at least 6 months duration), intractable peripheral neuropathic pain, exclusive of the craniofacial region; any nociceptive pain must be less prominent than the neuropathic pain. Pain should have a predominant neuropathic component as per the investigator's clinical assessment.
- Subject should have a pain score of at least 6, in the target area of pain, as recorded on the BPI-Q5 (NRS) at screening.
- Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including, compliance with the study procedures and completion of all study visits.
- Subject reported stable pain (non-escalating) for 60 days prior to signing informed consent.
- Subject is currently receiving CMM and has had stable pain medication use and dosage for 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
- Subject is psychologically qualified to receive a peripheral nerve stimulator as per the clinician's standard clinical practice and judgment and does not have clinically relevant psychological condition(s) that would interfere with their ability to accurately report outcomes or complete study procedures.
- Subject has demonstrated the ability to appropriately place the adhesive clip in the location where the IPG is most likely to be implanted. Alternatively, subject is able to appropriately use the relief belt and/or limb cuff to keep the Therapy Disc in place.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject currently has an active implantable medical device such as a drug pump, spinal cord stimulator, peripheral nerve stimulator, sacral nerve stimulator, deep brain stimulator, and/or cardiac pacemaker.
- \. Subject has previously failed PNS or Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) or Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) therapy (trial or permanent implant). See note below.
- \. Pain is completely absent at rest. 4. Patient has clinical evidence of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), peripheral neuralgia of metabolic origin, post-herpetic neuralgia, biochemical evidence of a metabolic or genetic neuropathy (e.g., Charcot'- Marie- Tooth Disease) or mixed motor/sensory polyneuropathy.
- \. Subject has a medical condition that would prevent them from participating in the current study per investigator's or medical monitor's judgment.
- \. Subject has had a successful (≥ 50% pain relief) interventional procedure within the past 3 months to treat the same pain condition(s) being examined in this study including, nerve blocks.
- \. Uncontrolled depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders 8. Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm.
- \. Subject is allergic or sensitive to materials used in the device components including, skin adhesives or does not tolerate the wearable aspect of the device.
- \. Subject has pending or ongoing legal issues (including unresolved worker's compensation claims or equivalent) or other conflicting secondary gain issues related to their chronic pain condition.
- \. Subject has a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, or progressive peripheral vascular disease that has not been medically corrected.
- \. Subject has an active systemic infection. 13. Subject is unable to read and/or write in English or give informed consent. 14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 1 year. 15. Subject has an active malignant neoplasm (metastatic or local) or evidence of paraneoplastic syndrome.
- \. Subject with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, showing signs of diabetic neuropathy, as evidenced by a neurological exam and a HbA1c test.
- \. Subject has evidence of an alcohol or drug dependency within the last 6 months prior to enrollment.
- \. Subject is pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 1 year post-menopausal).
- \. Subject is nursing/breastfeeding. 20. Subject is on ≥90 mg-morphine equivalents per 24 hours. 21. Subject has undergone an ablative treatment of the target peripheral nerve, or proximal nerve trunk giving rise to the target nerve, or dorsal roots (and DRGs) that ultimately make up the target nerve. No ablative procedures directed at the spinal cord, dorsal roots, or peripheral nerve(s) being treated in the study. To note, subjects who have undergone RF ablation of the dorsal rami, cool pulsed RF of the facet innervation may be considered for enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
The Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85710, United States
Comprehensive Spine & Pain Physicians
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
Pain Management and Injury Relief
Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, United States
DBPS Research LLC
Denver, Colorado, 80111, United States
International Spine, Pain & Performance Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
Coastal Spine & Pain Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 23305, United States
University of Kansas Health System, Bell Hospital Marc A. Asher Comprehensive Spine Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Insight Research Institute
Flint, Michigan, 48507, United States
NeuroInterventional Pain Management
Monroe, Michigan, 48161, United States
Michigan Neurology & Spine Center
Port Huron, Michigan, 48060, United States
Advanced Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728, United States
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
Pacific Sports and Spine
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Columbia Pain Management
Milwaukie, Oregon, 97222, United States
Pain Specialists of America
Austin, Texas, 78745, United States
Institute of Precision Pain Medicine
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414, United States
Anesis Spine and Pain Care
Spokane, Washington, 99216, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Patrick Martin
Nalu Medical, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2023
First Posted
May 23, 2023
Study Start
April 27, 2023
Primary Completion
April 15, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share