NCT05287373

Brief Summary

This post market study is being conducted to document the comparative effectiveness and safety of peripheral nerve stimulation plus conventional medical management versus conventional medical management alone in the treatment of chronic, intractable peripheral neuralgia of post-traumatic or post-surgical origin. This is a prospective, minimal risk, multi-center, randomized control trial.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
89

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Feb 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

13 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress91%
Feb 2022Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 23, 2022

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 11, 2023

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PNSPeripheral nerve stimulationmIPGperipheral nerve stimulator

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Effectiveness: Responder rates between groups

    Difference in responder rates between groups. Responder rate is defined as the percent of subjects with 50% or greater pain relief from baseline, based on the BPI-Q5 (NRS).

    3-months

  • Safety: Rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between groups

    Rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between groups

    3-months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Responder Rates between groups at 6-months

    6 months

  • Responder Rates between groups at 12-months

    12-months

  • Responder Rates between groups at 24-months

    24-months

  • Responder Rates between groups at 36-months

    36-months

  • Functional Outcomes: Change in ODI, BDI, EQ-5D, BPI from baseline

    3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PNS Therapy plus Conventional Medical Management

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

peripheral nerve stimulator plus conventional medical management

Device: Nalu Neurostimulation System for PNSOther: conventional medical management

Conventional Medical Management

OTHER

Control arm conventional medical management only

Other: conventional medical management

Interventions

Conventional medical management

Conventional Medical ManagementPNS Therapy plus Conventional Medical Management

The Nalu Neurostimulation System for PNS is a peripheral nerve stimulator

Also known as: Nalu PNS
PNS Therapy plus Conventional Medical Management

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is between 18 to 80 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • Subject would have been prescribed PNS therapy regardless of participation in this study; the use of the Nalu device must be on-label.
  • Subject has been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions listed below in the low back, shoulder, knee, or foot (including ankle):Post-surgical/post-traumatic peripheral neuralgia including but not limited to pain due to peripheral nerve injury, post-surgical scar formation, nerve entrapment; Mononeuropathy, specified or unspecified or in diseases classified elsewhere; Other neuralgia or neuropathic pain; Osteoarthritic pain.
  • Subject has chronic (defined as at least 6 months duration), intractable peripheral neuropathic pain, exclusive of the craniofacial region; any nociceptive pain must be less prominent than the neuropathic pain. Pain should have a predominant neuropathic component as per the investigator's clinical assessment.
  • Subject should have a pain score of at least 6, in the target area of pain, as recorded on the BPI-Q5 (NRS) at screening.
  • Subject is willing to cooperate with the study requirements including, compliance with the study procedures and completion of all study visits.
  • Subject reported stable pain (non-escalating) for 60 days prior to signing informed consent.
  • Subject is currently receiving CMM and has had stable pain medication use and dosage for 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
  • Subject is psychologically qualified to receive a peripheral nerve stimulator as per the clinician's standard clinical practice and judgment and does not have clinically relevant psychological condition(s) that would interfere with their ability to accurately report outcomes or complete study procedures.
  • Subject has demonstrated the ability to appropriately place the adhesive clip in the location where the IPG is most likely to be implanted. Alternatively, subject is able to appropriately use the relief belt and/or limb cuff to keep the Therapy Disc in place.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject currently has an active implantable medical device such as a drug pump, spinal cord stimulator, peripheral nerve stimulator, sacral nerve stimulator, deep brain stimulator, and/or cardiac pacemaker.
  • Subject has previously failed PNS or Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) or Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) therapy (trial or permanent implant)
  • Pain is completely absent at rest.
  • Patient has clinical evidence of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), peripheral neuralgia of metabolic origin, post-herpetic neuralgia, biochemical evidence of a metabolic or genetic neuropathy (e.g., Charcot'- Marie- Tooth Disease) or mixed motor/sensory polyneuropathy.
  • Subject has a medical condition that would prevent them from participating in the current study per investigator's or medical monitor's judgment.
  • Subject has had a successful (≥ 50% pain relief) interventional procedure within the past 3 months to treat the same pain condition(s) being examined in this study including, nerve blocks.
  • Uncontrolled depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
  • Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation with an active treatment arm.
  • Subject is allergic or sensitive to materials used in the device components including, skin adhesives or does not tolerate the wearable aspect of the device.
  • Subject has pending or ongoing legal issues (including unresolved worker's compensation claims or equivalent) or other conflicting secondary gain issues related to their chronic pain condition.
  • Subject has a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, or progressive peripheral vascular disease that has not been medically corrected.
  • Subject has an active systemic infection.
  • Subject is unable to read and/or write in English or give informed consent.
  • Subject has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Subject has an active malignant neoplasm (metastatic or local) or evidence of paraneoplastic syndrome.
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Arizona Pain Specialists

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States

Location

University of Arkansas Interventional Spine and Pain Clinic

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States

Location

Comprehensive Spine & Pain Physicians

Burbank, California, 91505, United States

Location

Stanford University Pain Management Center

Redwood City, California, 94063, United States

Location

Pain Management and Injury Relief

Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, United States

Location

DBPS Research LLC

Denver, Colorado, 80111, United States

Location

International Spine, Pain & Performance Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006, United States

Location

The Center for Clinical Research

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States

Location

Pacific Sports and Spine

Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States

Location

Columbia Pain Management

Milwaukie, Oregon, 97222, United States

Location

Pain Specialists of America

Austin, Texas, 78745, United States

Location

Institute of Precision Pain Medicine

Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414, United States

Location

Anesis Spine and Pain Care

Spokane, Washington, 99216, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hatheway J, Hersel A, Engle M, Gutierrez G, Khemlani V, Kapural L, Moore G, Ajakwe R, Trainor D, Hah J, Staats PS, Makous J, Heit G, Kottalgi S, Desai MJ; COMFORT Study Group. Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 12-month results from the COMFORT-randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2026 Mar 5;51(3):278-284. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106099.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Patrick Martin

    Nalu Medical

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2022

First Posted

March 18, 2022

Study Start

February 23, 2022

Primary Completion

December 11, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

March 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations