Impact of Neuro-linguistic Programming on Schoolchildren's Performance
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a methodology developed in the 1970s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, based on the idea that language and behavior are interconnected and can be systematically modeled and changed. NLP is often used as a form of psychotherapy, coaching, or personal development, although its effectiveness has been debated in the scientific community. NLP practitioners believe that our thoughts, emotions, and behavior are influenced by our internal representations of the world, which are constructed through language and sensory experiences. Changing the use of language and the perception of experiences, thoughts, emotions, and behavior can be adjusted accordingly. NLP uses various techniques to achieve this, including reframing, anchoring, and rapport-building. Reframing involves changing the perception of a situation by putting it in a different context or perspective. Anchoring consists in associating a particular state of mind or emotion with a specific physical or sensory stimulus, such as a touch or a smell. Rapport-building involves establishing a connection and a sense of trust with another person through mirroring and matching their body language, tone of voice, and language patterns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2023
CompletedJune 22, 2023
June 1, 2023
3 months
May 3, 2023
June 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Identification of school triggers through ''Identify School Triggers'' questionnaire
130 children will be asked to fill out the ''Identify school triggers'' questionnaire by rating items depending on the strength of the trigger impact. A score over 20 will be calculated and the strength of the triggers will be evaluated after categorizing the scores.
2 months after the intervention
Schoolchildren's strengths and difficulties progression through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
A parent (mother or father or legal guardian) of 130 children will be asked to fill out a survey. The first 25 items in the SDQ comprise 5 scales of 5 items each. It is usually easiest to score all 5 scales before working out the Total Difficulties score. Somewhat True is always scored as 1, but the scoring of Not True and Certainly True varies with each item. For each of the 5 scales, the score can range from 0-10 if all 5 items were completed. Scale scores can be prorated if at least 3 items were completed. Using the comments, a "substantial risk of clinically significant problems" score on the Total Difficulties Score can be used to identify likely ''cases" with mental disorders.
2 months after the intervention
Concentration, hyperactivity, and reasoning of schoolchildren through the Vanderbilt Assessment Scale
Two different teachers will complete the survey for each student (130 students and 12 teachers). The initial assessment scales, parent and teacher, have two components: Symptom assessment and impairment in performance. Symptom assessment screens for symptoms that meet the criteria for inattentive (items 1-9) and hyperactive attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (items 10-18). To meet the requirements for the diagnosis, one must have at least six positive responses to either the inattentive nine or hyperactive nine core symptoms, or both. The specific item sets and numbers of positives required for each co-morbid symptom screen set are detailed below. The second section of the scale has many performance measures, scored 1 to 5, with 4 and 5 being somewhat of a problem/problematic.
2 months after the intervention
Interventions
Intervention: Neuro-linguistic program developed by three specialists (a clinical psychologist, a social worker, and one education specialist). 4 (45 minutes) sessions for teachers, and 2 for children (total of 6 sessions)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Schoolchildren aged between 5 and 11 years attending the same school for at least a year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Notre dame de la paix
Beirut, Lebanon
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roula Abou Assi, PhD
Lebanese University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2023
First Posted
May 23, 2023
Study Start
March 20, 2023
Primary Completion
June 6, 2023
Study Completion
June 10, 2023
Last Updated
June 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share