NCT05805410

Brief Summary

Determine the effect of repeated pelvis perturbation training on trunk posture and locomotor function in children with CP.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Nov 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress85%
Nov 2022Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) score from baseline.

    The maximum value for the total TCMS is 58 points (no unit). Specifically, there is 20 points for the category 'static sitting balance', 28 points for 'selective movement control', and 10 points for 'dynamic reaching'). A higher TCMS scores indicates a better motor performance in trunk control.

    baseline, post 6 weeks of training and 8 weeks after the end of training.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Walking speed from baseline

    baseline, post 6 weeks of training and 8 weeks after the end of training.

  • Chang in 6-minute walking distance from baseline

    baseline, post 6 weeks of training and 8 weeks after the end of training.

  • Change in GMFM-66

    baseline, post 6 weeks of training and 8 weeks after the end of training.

Study Arms (2)

Robotic hippotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

For the robotic training group, each subject will be trained for 40 minutes. Specifically, each participant will sit astride on a robotic horse with the force perturbation will be applied in the anterior-posterior direction and up/down direction.

Behavioral: robotic hippotherapy

Conventional physical therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the conventional physical therapy group, each subject will be trained for 40 minutes, which will include 10 minutes of stretching, followed by 10 minutes of sitting and 10 minutes of standing balance training, and 10 minutes of treadmill walking.

Behavioral: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

A custom designed cable-driven robotic system that mimics horseback movement during walking was used in this study.

Robotic hippotherapy

Stretching of trunk and leg muscles, followed by sitting and standing balance training, and conventional treadmill walking.

Conventional physical therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age4 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children with a diagnosis of bilateral spastic CP attributed to complications of prematurity, intracranial hemorrhage and periventricular leukmalacia according to the definition of Bax.
  • Children aged 4 to 12 years old without Botulinum toxin treatment within 6 months, and without surgeries (such as selective dorsal rhizotomy) within 12 months before the onset of the training.
  • Subjects will be able to remain seated without help for ≥10s.
  • GMFCS levels will be I to IV.
  • Children must be able to signal pain, fear or discomfort reliably.
  • Children with mild scoliosis (Cobb angle \< 20 °).
  • Children with CP who have no prior hippotherapy experiences within 6 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • severe lower extremity contractures, fractures, osseous instabilities, osteoporosis.
  • severe disproportional bone growth.
  • unhealed skin lesions in the lower extremities.
  • thromboembolic diseases, cardiovascular instability.
  • aggressive or self-harming behaviors.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Child Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Ming Wu

    Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2022

First Posted

April 10, 2023

Study Start

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

June 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations