NCT05857579

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of microblepharoeexfoliation (MBE), intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) combination in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). The main question it aims to answer are:

  • Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye symptoms?
  • Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye signs? Participants were assigned to receive either three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy (treatment group) or home-based therapy alone (control group). The investigators will compare both groups to see if MBE-IPL-MGX treatment is superior to home-based therapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

MicroblepharoexfoliationIntense pulse lightMeibomian gland expressionMeibomian gland dysfunction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire.

    Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline OSDI at 2 months.

  • Tear meniscus height (TMH)

    Change from Baseline TMH at 2 months.

  • Tear meniscus area (TMA)

    Change from Baseline TMA at 2 months.

  • Noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT).

    Change from Baseline NIBUT at 2 months.

  • Lipid Layer Grade (LLG)

    Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline LLG at 2 months.

  • Ciliary hyperemia

    Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline Ciliary Hyperemia at 2 months.

  • Conjunctival hyperemia

    Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline Conjunctival Hyperemia at 2 months.

  • Meibomian glands Loss area (LAMG)

    Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline LAMG at 2 months.

  • Meibomian gland secretions (MGS)

    Values from 0 (Worse) to 45 (Better)

    Change from Baseline MGS at 2 months.

  • Meibomian gland Dysfunction Grade (MGD Grade)

    Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline MGD grade at 2 months.

  • Ocular surface staining (OSS).

    Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

    Change from Baseline OSS at 2 months.

Study Arms (2)

MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL

In this arm, participants received three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

Procedure: MicroblepharoexfoliationProcedure: Intense pulse lightProcedure: Meibomian gland expressionDrug: Home-based therapy

Home-based therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm, participants received home-based therapy alone.

Drug: Home-based therapy

Interventions

MBE was performed using the yokefellow instrument (Youke Electronic Corporation, Guangzhou, China), which contains a handpiece with a 1.80 mm diameter medical-grade diamond bur. Patients underwent MBE on the upper and lower lid margin of both eyes at 500 rpm until complete removal of accumulated biofilm debris, epithelial keratinization or capped meibomian glands. MBE was carried out only in the first combined treatment session.

Also known as: MBE
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

IPL treatment was carried out with Thermaeye Plus (MDS Medical Technologies SL, Barcelona, Spain). The procedure began by applying an ultrasound gel (Carmado SL, Alicante, Spain) to the patient's periocular areas and upper eyelids. In the periocular areas, 6 light pulses were applied; 4 light pulses on the skin below the lower eyelid (with handpiece placed horizontally in the first pass and vertically in the second pass) and 2 light pulses on the canthal area (with handpiece placed vertically in first and second pass). The parameters were as follows: (1) Filter: 650 nm; (2) fluence: 9 j/cm2; (3) pulses: 2; (4) duration: 3 ms; (5) Delay: 20 ms; and (6) Cooling: 70%. In the upper eyelids, 4 light pulses were applied; 2 light pulses in the first and second pass, respectively. The parameters were as follows: (1) Filter: 650 nm; (2) Fluence: 5 j/cm2; (3) pulses: 1; (4) duration: 3 ms and (5) Cooling: 70%.

Also known as: IPL
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

Finally, the MGX was performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye with a Collins forceps (Medi Instrument Inc, New York, USA).

Also known as: MGX
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

Home-based therapy was based on Therapearl eye mask warming compress (Bausch \& Lomb, Madrid, Spain) twice a day and Eyestil synfo eyedrops (Sifi Iberica SL, Madrid, Spain) 4 times a day during the study

Also known as: HBT
Home-based therapyMBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • DED diagnosis according to DEWS II meeting one of the following conditions: (2.1) ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score ≥ 13; (2.2) NIBUT \< 10 seconds; and (2.3) ocular surface staining with \> 5 or 9 corneal or conjunctival stains, respectively.
  • MGD diagnosis according to the international workshop on MGD meeting two of the following conditions: (3.1) irregularity of the eyelid margin or mucocutaneous junction; (3.2) vascularity of the eyelid margin; (3.3) plugged or capped Meibomian gland orifices; (3.4) Meibomian gland atrophy; or (3.5) decreased meibum quality and quantity

You may not qualify if:

  • Skin pathologies that prevent IPL treatment
  • All corneal disorders that affect diagnostic tests, such as: (2.1) active corneal infections; and (2.2) corneal dystrophies.
  • Active ocular allergy.
  • Pregnant or lactating women..
  • Patients who did not understand or comprehend the informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Novovision ophthalmologic clinic

Murcia, 30009, Spain

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Murphy O, O'Dwyer V, Lloyd-McKernan A. The efficacy of tea tree face wash, 1, 2-Octanediol and microblepharoexfoliation in treating Demodex folliculorum blepharitis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Feb;41(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

    PMID: 29074306BACKGROUND
  • Mohammad-Rabei H, Arabi A, Shahraki T, Rezaee-Alam Z, Baradaran-Rafii A. Role of Blepharoexfoliation in Demodex Blepharitis: A Randomized Comparative Study. Cornea. 2023 Jan 1;42(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003046. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

    PMID: 35439775BACKGROUND
  • Epstein IJ, Rosenberg E, Stuber R, Choi MB, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. Double-Masked and Unmasked Prospective Study of Terpinen-4-ol Lid Scrubs With Microblepharoexfoliation for the Treatment of Demodex Blepharitis. Cornea. 2020 Apr;39(4):408-416. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002243.

    PMID: 31939919BACKGROUND
  • Siddireddy JS, Tan J, Vijay AK, Willcox MDP. The Effect of Microblepharon Exfoliation on Clinical Correlates of Contact Lens Discomfort. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Mar;96(3):187-199. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001354.

    PMID: 30801507BACKGROUND
  • Sambhi RS, Sambhi GDS, Mather R, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Intense pulsed light therapy with meibomian gland expression for dry eye disease. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;55(3):189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.11.009. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

    PMID: 31941589BACKGROUND
  • Leng X, Shi M, Liu X, Cui J, Sun H, Lu X. Intense pulsed light for meibomian gland dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;259(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04834-1. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

    PMID: 32725403BACKGROUND
  • Miao S, Yan R, Jia Y, Pan Z. Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):424-429. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000934. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

    PMID: 36044829BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye SyndromesMeibomian Gland Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye DiseasesEyelid Diseases

Study Officials

  • Antonio Ballesteros Sánchez

    University of Seville

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2023

First Posted

May 12, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

January 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations