Written Language Intervention for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Optimizing Language Outcomes for Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Written Language Intervention Using Functional Texts
2 other identifiers
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a written language intervention using functional texts for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 14, 2026
CompletedJanuary 14, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.8 years
April 14, 2023
November 20, 2025
December 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies
Total number of different reading comprehension strategies used correctly. A blank version of the FRAME intervention graphic organizer including only the picture icons of the reading comprehension strategies was displayed alongside a functional text stimulus (e.g., text messages, e-mails) that was designed to closely reflect participants' daily written communications. the examiner prompted the participant to begin reading the functional text. Each think-aloud was scored for the participants' accurate use of reading comprehension strategies. A percent accuracy score was calculated based on (a) the total number of strategies implemented correctly (out of nine; excluding Strategy 4 \[read text aloud\] because all participants were expected to read the text) and (b) implementing the strategies at the appropriate time (before, during, after reading) to earn up to three additional points (max score = 12). Higher scores reflect better performance.
3 months after start of intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reading Comprehension of Functional Texts
3 months after start of intervention
Use of Spoken Language to Indicate Comprehension
3 months after start of intervention
Spoken Language: Summarize
3 months after start of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Written language intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 3 months of weekly written language intervention sessions via telepractice. Participants will be assessed at three time points to monitor outcomes.
Periodic language check-up
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be assessed at three time points to monitor outcomes.
Interventions
Young adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) are taught reading comprehension strategies in three phases (before, during, after) using a graphic organizer as visual support. At the beginning of each phase, the interventionist: (a) defines the strategies, (b) describes and models how to use the strategies, and (c) answers questions about the strategies. Then the participant practices the strategies during 45-min sessions, two times per week, over 3 months. Each session follows the teach-model-coach-review format, the interventionist: (a) reviews the strategies (5 min), (b) models the strategies using a think-aloud (10 min), (c) prompts the participant to practice the strategies with support (15 min), (d) prompts the participant to use a think-aloud to practice the strategies independently using a functional literacy text (10 min), and (e) reviews and summarizes the session (review; 5 min).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- intellectual and/or developmental disability
- correctly read at least 80% of words on word reading screener
- have functional literacy needs
- English as primary spoken language and use oral communication as their primary form of communication
- normal or corrected to normal vision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baylor University
Waco, Texas, 76798, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Alison Prahl
- Organization
- Texas Christian University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2023
First Posted
May 10, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 14, 2025
Study Completion
February 15, 2025
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Results First Posted
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12