NCT05850169

Brief Summary

Although some benefits of dance have been described for motor and cognitive skills, the effects on individuals with dyslexia are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of creative dance training on the motor and executive skills of children with dyslexia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 24, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 7, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 24, 2020

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2023

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 9, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 28, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition Brief Form, (BOT-2 SF)

    Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Second Edition Brief Form, (BOT-2 SF) was used to assess the motor functions of the participants. BOT2- SF consists of eight subdomains, including fine motor precision, fine motor integration, manual dexterity, bilateral coordination, balance, upper limb coordination, strength, speed and agility, and includes a total of 12 items (Bruininks, 2010). The test takes 15-20 minutes to complete. The higher score obtained from the test indicates a better performance in motor competence, and the highest score that can be obtained from the test is 72 points (Bruininks, 2010). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the BOT2-SF was conducted by Köse et al. (2018) on children with specific learning difficulties.

    20 minutes

  • Executive Function and Occupational Routines Scale (EFORTS)

    Executive Function and Occupational Routines Scale (EFORTS) was used to assess participants' executive functions. EFORTS is a 30-item scale that measures the child's daily routine and consists of three factors: morning and evening routines, play and leisure routines, and social routine (Frisch \& Rosenblum, 2014). It is completed by the family and rated on a 1-5 Likert scale. A high score on each item indicates that the child performs better in an occupation that requires executive functions. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Akyürek and Bumin (2017).

    20 minutes

Study Arms (2)

intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

After completion of the initial assessments, the intervention group received 3 sessions per week of creative dance training for 4 weeks (12 sessions), with each session lasting approximately 40 minutes. The creative dance training took place in a 40-square-metre mirrored hall with a tatami mat on the floor. The training was conducted individually for each child in the IG. Different children's songs were selected for each session in harmony with the rhythm of the dance movements. In each session, 10 minutes of warm-up movements and 20 minutes of creative dance training were conducted, accompanied by songs. Meanwhile, materials such as spiky and heavy balls, ribbons, rhythm sticks and holihop were included in the application. The creative dance training was planned by diversifying the 8 movement models (breath, tactile, core-distal, head-tail, upper-lower, body side, cross lateral and vestibular) of "Brain Dance", which is a part of creative dance (Gilbert, 2002,2015).

Other: Creative Dance Therapy

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

After completion of the initial assessments, the intervention group received 3 sessions per week of creative dance training for 4 weeks (12 sessions), with each session lasting approximately 40 minutes. The creative dance training took place in a 40-square-metre mirrored hall with a tatami mat on the floor. The training was conducted individually for each child in the IG. Different children's songs were selected for each session in harmony with the rhythm of the dance movements. In each session, 10 minutes of warm-up movements and 20 minutes of creative dance training were conducted, accompanied by songs. Meanwhile, materials such as spiky and heavy balls, ribbons, rhythm sticks and holihop were included in the application. The creative dance training was planned by diversifying the 8 movement models (breath, tactile, core-distal, head-tail, upper-lower, body side, cross lateral and vestibular) of "Brain Dance", which is a part of creative dance (Gilbert, 2002,2015).

intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 10 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • an age between 6 and 10 years
  • a diagnosis of dyslexia according to DSM-V criteria
  • continued formal education in elementary school
  • participation in routine literacy training in a special education and rehabilitation center
  • voluntary participation in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • having additional physical or psychological problem accompanying the dyslexia
  • using of psychotic drugs
  • participating in sports regularly.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cemre Bafralı

Ankara, Altındağ, 6050, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dyslexia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Language DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSpecific Learning DisorderLearning DisabilitiesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Cemre Bafralı, Msc

    Ankara Medipol University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2023

First Posted

May 9, 2023

Study Start

August 24, 2019

Primary Completion

October 7, 2019

Study Completion

December 24, 2020

Last Updated

May 9, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations