Non-inferiority Study of Rituximab Compared to Ocrelizumab in Relapsing MS
Noisy Rebels
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: Ocrelizumab is widely and effectively used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Phase II studies and data from large patient cohorts indicate that rituximab, another anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is probably equally effective and safe as ocrelizumab in the treatment of RMS. An advantage of rituximab is a considerably lower price. Therefore we will start a study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of rituximab compared to ocrelizumab in RMS. If non-inferiority of rituximab can be shown, important reductions in the cost of treatment of RMS will be possible, without loss of efficacy. Objective: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of ritixumab compared to ocrelizumab in the treatmens of RMS. Study design: Randomized double blind multi-centre non-inferiority study of rituximab compared to ocrelizumab in 200 patients with RMS. The trial duration will be 30 months Study population: The study population consists of 200 adult RMS patiens with an indication to start anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment. Intervention: Patients will be randomized 1:1 into the standard group (ocrelizumab treatment) or the experimental group (rituximab treatment). Main study parameters: To conclude non-inferiority of rituximab there will be one primary endpoint: the proportion of patients free of inflammatory disease activity (defined as: new or enlarged T2 lesions) between week 24 (M6) and week 96 (M24) of treatment in each arm. Secondary trial endpoints are presence and number of clinical relapses,T2 and contrast enhancing lesion volumes, brain volume and brain volume changes, disease progression (defined as clinically relevant change on any of the measures: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT, SDMT), biochemical parameters such as lipidomics and neurofilament light (NfL), immunological parameters, safety as measured by the number of (serious) adverse events ((S)AE), quality of life (EQ-5D-L) and treatment satisfaction (TSQM) and patient reported measures of MS impact (MSIS-29) and well-being (questionnaire on physical complaints) Nature and extent of the burden and risk: Patients included in this study will be treated and monitored by MRI, clinical tests and laboratory tests according to existing protocols and will not be exposed to extra or unknown risks. They will have extra annual questionnaires and larger blood samples at some time points. There is extensive experience with both rituximab and ocrelizumab as efficacious and safe treatments of RMS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 multiple-sclerosis
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for phase_3 multiple-sclerosis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
April 28, 2023
April 1, 2023
4.1 years
April 3, 2023
April 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients free of inflammatory disease activity
Proportion of patients with no new or enlarged T2 lesions on brain MRI between month 6 and month 24
between month 6 and month 24
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Presence and number of clinical relapses
Baseline, month 6, month 24
Contrast enhancing lesions
Baseline, month 6, month 24
Average number of T2 lesions on brain MRI
Baseline, month 6, month 24
Disability progression during follow-up
Baseline, month 6, month 24
Disability progression during follow-up
Baseline, month 6, month 24
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (16)
Anti-drug antibodies
30 months
Infusion reactions
30 months
Infections
30 months
- +13 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ocrelizumab
NO INTERVENTIONThe standard group will receive ocrelizumab (600 mg, the first dosage given in two infusion of 300 mg with a two week interval) following the current treatment protocol
Rituximab
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive rituximab (1000 mg). Rituximab will be given intravenously. To ensure blinding of treatment allocation two dosages of 500 mg with a two week interval will be given instead of one initial dosage of 1000 mg of rituximab to mimic the ocrelizumab protocol
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women aged 18 years and older
- A diagnosis of relapsing MS according to the 2017 revised diagnostic criteria
- Indication to start treatment with anti-CD20 therapy according to the treating neurologist and the relevant label in the Netherlands for treatment of relapsing MS
- Able to understand written and spoken Dutch or English
- Capable of giving signed informed consent including compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
- Screening EDSS score ≤ 6.5 .
You may not qualify if:
- Medical Conditions
- A known allergy or other intolerability to RTX, OCR, gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents, or corticosteroids.
- A diagnosis of primary progressive MS according to the diagnostic criteria.
- A diagnosis of not-active secondary progressive MS.
- Chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, VZV, hepatitis virus or HIV, as well as hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and/or hepatitis C PCR positivity verified at screening visit.
- A history of proven inflammatory bowel disease such as M. Crohn or ulcerative colitis
- Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an informed consent or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol.
- Cardiac disease that makes treatment with OCR or RTX contra-indicated as stated by the most recent SmPC
- Active malignancy or prior history of malignancy that makes treatment with OCR or RTX contra-indicated as stated by the most recent SmPC.
- WBC \< 1.5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be \> 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment.
- Platelet (thrombocyte) count \< 100 x 109/L
- ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (ULN)
- Serum creatinine \> 200 μmol/L
- Serum bilirubin \> ULN
- Serum IgG \< LLN
- +14 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmclead
- Stichting Treatmedscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bob van Oosten, Dr
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient, site personnel administrating infusions, and the treating and evaluating neurologist and study nurse will all be blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2023
First Posted
April 28, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After medical ethical commitee approved the study protocol