NCT05833087

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical study is to test a particular form of psychotherapy, called schema therapy, for people with difficult-to-treat depression (when depression is very lengthy or difficult to cure with antidepressive medication). Researchers will compare the group of participants receiving schema therapy to a group receiving standard psychotherapeutic treatment to see if schema therapy is more effective on depression symptoms and other important issues for the participant. The main question the study aims to answer is: \- Can schema therapy be a more effective treatment for difficult-to-treat depression than other forms of psychotherapy offered in psychiatry today? People who have difficult-to-treat depression are a special group of patients who are more strained in a wide range of areas of life than other people with depression. They also more often have childhood trauma, as well as simultaneous personality disorder or personality traits that brings challenges in everyday life. Currently we can not offer a sufficiently effective psychiatric treatment for this group of people. Schema therapy was developed to help patients who do not have sufficient effect of the usual psychotherapeutic treatments. It also addresses personality disorders or problematic traits and childhood trauma directly in the therapy. The project will include 129 participants in total, of which half will receive schema therapy. Treatment is provided at six psychiatric centers in both the Southern and the Capital Regions of Denmark. Participants receiving schema therapy will be given 30 sessions of weekly therapy, as well as the opportunity for the rest of the standard care package in the Danish secondary mental health system, that is, treatment with psychopharmacological medicine and meetings with next-to-kin and other parts of the participant's support system. Participants receiving the standard treatment will receive about 6-20 sessions of individual or group therapy with a range of other psychotherapies that are not schema therapy, as well as the other parts of the standard care package as listed above. If schema therapy proves to be more effective for treatment of difficult-to-treat depression than the treatment offered today, it may give rise to more extended use of schema therapy in and outside psychiatry. This means that the toolbox for the treatment of difficult-to-treat depression is expanded with a new specialized and effective psychotherapeutic tool.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
129

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Apr 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress49%
Apr 2023Jul 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 15, 2023

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 17, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2023

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2029

Last Updated

September 23, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

April 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

treatment resistant depressionschema therapypsychotherapydifficult-to-treat depressionchronic depressionclinical trialrandomized controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in depression symptoms on the clinician-rated Hamilton-6 Rating Scale for Depression at 12 months after baseline measurements

    6-item clinician rated instrument

    From baseline measurements to end of treatment (of schema therapy) at 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (46)

  • Change from baseline in depression symptoms on the Hamilton-6 Rating Scale for Depression at 6 months after baseline measurements

    From baseline measurements to end of treatment (Treatment at usual) at 6 months

  • Change from baseline in depression symptoms on the Hamilton-6 Rating Scale for Depression at 24 months after baseline measurements

    From baseline measurements to after 24 months

  • Change from baseline in subjective functional impairment as measured on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 6 months after baseline measurements

    From baseline measurements to end of treatment (Treatment at usual) at 6 months

  • Change from baseline in subjective functional impairment as measured on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 12 months after baseline measurements

    From baseline measurements to end of treatment (of schema therapy) at 12 months

  • Change from baseline in subjective functional impairment as measured on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) at 24 months after baseline measurements

    From baseline measurements to after 24 months

  • +41 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Treatments for depression in earlier and current depressive episode as predictors of treatment effect

    Collected at baseline only

  • Childhood adversity, as measured on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) as predictor of treatment effect

    Collected at baseline only

Study Arms (2)

Schema therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants in this arm will receive up to 30 individual, weekly sessions of consecutive Schema Therapy (ST). A treatment manual for ST has been written for the study, based on former studies of ST on chronic depression as well as the manual for a major clinical trial on ST for avoidant personality disorder.

Behavioral: Schema therapyOther: Standard care package content

Treatment as Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with moderate-severe depression in the Danish secondary psychiatric sector are treated according to standard 'treatment packages', in the 'Main Function' offering from 6 to 16 weekly sessions of psychotherapy, in group or individually, typically Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, psychodynamic or interpersonal therapy or other evidence-based therapies.

Behavioral: Other psychotherapyOther: Standard care package content

Interventions

Schema therapyBEHAVIORAL

30 sessions of schema therapy. The therapy was developed by Jeffrey Young and others and encompasses elements from cognitive behavioral, psychodynamic, and gestalt therapies, as well as attachment theory.

Schema therapy

In this arm, psychotherapy can be psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral, interpersonal or other evidence-based psychotherapies, aimed at changing cognitions, behavior, improve social relations and uncover unconstructive psychological patterns.

Treatment as Usual

Standard care packages: The patient is offered prescription and monitoring of psychopharmacological treatment of up to 5 hours by a psychiatrist, when appropriate. Additionally, patients have up to 3 hours of preparatory and diagnostic sessions and up to 4 hours of meetings with the participation of next-of-kin and/or collaboration partners in other public instances. Expanded package: In one center, specialized treatment is offered for difficult-to-treat depression. Up to 9 months of psychotherapy is offered, as well as close follow-up on adjustment in medicine.

Schema therapyTreatment as Usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants should meet the diagnosis of chronic or treatment-resistant depression as follows:
  • Clinical major depression as measured by the M.I.N.I. diagnostic interview: duration minimum two years OR persistent after = 2 trials of antidepressants from different classes, in an adequate dosage and time period (= 4 weeks) OR moderate treatment resistance as measured on the MSM-scale, score \> 6
  • Minimum a score of 9 points on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 6 (HAMD-6), corresponding to moderate to severe depression

You may not qualify if:

  • Alcohol or substance abuse
  • Bipolar or psychotic disorder
  • Acute suicidal risk
  • Mental disability (estimated IQ \< 70)
  • Non-Danish speaker

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Psychotherapeutic Out-patient Clinic, Psychiatric Center Ballerup, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark

Ballerup Municipality, 2750, Denmark

RECRUITING

Outpatient clinic for Affective Disorders, Frederiksberg, Capital Region of Denmark Psychiatry

Copenhagen, 2000, Denmark

NOT YET RECRUITING

Psychotherapeutic Out-patient Clinic, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen/Nannasgade, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark

Copenhagen, 2200, Denmark

RECRUITING

Psychotherapeutic Clinic Frederiksberg, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark

Frederiksberg, Denmark

RECRUITING

Local Psychiatry Odense, Region of Southern Denmark Psychiatry

Odense, Denmark

RECRUITING

Psychiatric Unit Odense-Svendborg, Southern Region of Denmark Psychiatry

Svendborg, 5700, Denmark

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (21)

  • Licht RW, Qvitzau S, Allerup P, Bech P. Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale in patients with major depression; is the total score a valid measure of illness severity? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 Feb;111(2):144-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00440.x.

    PMID: 15667434BACKGROUND
  • Ostergaard SD, Bech P, Miskowiak KW. Fewer study participants needed to demonstrate superior antidepressant efficacy when using the Hamilton melancholia subscale (HAM-D(6)) as outcome measure. J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:842-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.047. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

    PMID: 25487682BACKGROUND
  • Timmerby N, Andersen JH, Sondergaard S, Ostergaard SD, Bech P. A Systematic Review of the Clinimetric Properties of the 6-Item Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6). Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(3):141-149. doi: 10.1159/000457131. Epub 2017 May 11.

    PMID: 28490031BACKGROUND
  • Trevino K, McClintock SM, McDonald Fischer N, Vora A, Husain MM. Defining treatment-resistant depression: a comprehensive review of the literature. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(3):222-32.

    PMID: 25166485BACKGROUND
  • Barnhofer T, Brennan K, Crane C, Duggan D, Williams JM. A comparison of vulnerability factors in patients with persistent and remitting lifetime symptom course of depression. J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

    PMID: 24183488BACKGROUND
  • Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Schuurmans J, van Oppen P, Hollon SD, Andersson G. Psychotherapy for chronic major depression and dysthymia: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;30(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.09.003.

    PMID: 19781837BACKGROUND
  • Demyttenaere K, Van Duppen Z. The Impact of (the Concept of) Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Opinion Review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Feb 1;22(2):85-92. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy052.

    PMID: 29961822BACKGROUND
  • Fekadu A, Wooderson S, Donaldson C, Markopoulou K, Masterson B, Poon L, Cleare AJ. A multidimensional tool to quantify treatment resistance in depression: the Maudsley staging method. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;70(2):177-84. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08m04309. Epub 2009 Jan 27.

    PMID: 19192471BACKGROUND
  • Kohler S, Chrysanthou S, Guhn A, Sterzer P. Differences between chronic and nonchronic depression: Systematic review and implications for treatment. Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jan;36(1):18-30. doi: 10.1002/da.22835. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

    PMID: 30300454BACKGROUND
  • Lim CR, Barlas J. The effects of Toxic Early Childhood Experiences on Depression according to Young Schema Model: A Scoping Review. J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

    PMID: 30562652BACKGROUND
  • Malogiannis IA, Arntz A, Spyropoulou A, Tsartsara E, Aggeli A, Karveli S, Vlavianou M, Pehlivanidis A, Papadimitriou GN, Zervas I. Schema therapy for patients with chronic depression: a single case series study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;45(3):319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

    PMID: 24650608BACKGROUND
  • Renner F, Arntz A, Peeters FP, Lobbestael J, Huibers MJ. Schema therapy for chronic depression: Results of a multiple single case series. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;51:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

    PMID: 26780673BACKGROUND
  • Moeller SB, Gbyl K, Hjorthoj C, Andreasen M, Austin SF, Buchholtz PE, Fonss L, Hjerrild S, Hogervorst L, Jorgensen MB, Ladegaard N, Martiny K, Meile J, Packness A, Sigaard KR, Straarup K, Straszek SPV, Soerensen CH, Welcher B, Videbech P. Treatment of difficult-to-treat depression - clinical guideline for selected interventions. Nord J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;76(3):177-188. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2021.1952303. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

    PMID: 34455900BACKGROUND
  • Riso LP, Miyatake RK, Thase ME. The search for determinants of chronic depression: a review of six factors. J Affect Disord. 2002 Jul;70(2):103-15. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00376-7.

    PMID: 12117622BACKGROUND
  • Rozental A, Castonguay L, Dimidjian S, Lambert M, Shafran R, Andersson G, Carlbring P. Negative effects in psychotherapy: commentary and recommendations for future research and clinical practice. BJPsych Open. 2018 Jul 25;4(4):307-312. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.42. eCollection 2018 Jul.

    PMID: 30083384BACKGROUND
  • Ruhe HG, van Rooijen G, Spijker J, Peeters FP, Schene AH. Staging methods for treatment resistant depression. A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

    PMID: 21435727BACKGROUND
  • Yakin D, Grasman R, Arntz A. Schema modes as a common mechanism of change in personality pathology and functioning: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2020 Mar;126:103553. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103553. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

    PMID: 32018065BACKGROUND
  • Jobst A, Brakemeier EL, Buchheim A, Caspar F, Cuijpers P, Ebmeier KP, Falkai P, Jan van der Gaag R, Gaebel W, Herpertz S, Kurimay T, Sabass L, Schnell K, Schramm E, Torrent C, Wasserman D, Wiersma J, Padberg F. European Psychiatric Association Guidance on psychotherapy in chronic depression across Europe. Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;33:18-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

    PMID: 26854984BACKGROUND
  • Renner F, Lobbestael J, Peeters F, Arntz A, Huibers M. Early maladaptive schemas in depressed patients: stability and relation with depressive symptoms over the course of treatment. J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.027. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

    PMID: 22119093BACKGROUND
  • Arendt ITP, Gondan M, Juul S, Hastrup LH, Hjorthoj C, Moeller SB. Statistical analysis plan for a parallel group randomized clinical trial comparing schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression (DEPRE-ST). Trials. 2025 Sep 1;26(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09012-4.

  • Arendt ITP, Gondan M, Juul S, Hastrup LH, Hjorthoj C, Bach B, Videbech P, Jorgensen MB, Moeller SB. Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST). Trials. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Interventions

Schema Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Stine B. Moeller, PhD

    Region of Southern Denmark Psychiatry; University of Southern Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ida-Marie T. P. Arendt

CONTACT

Stine B. Møller, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors are blinded to treatment condition and to the hypotheses of the study. Different assessors will be assigned at each measurement time point. Participants and therapists are instructed to withhold information about the treatment from the research team. The research team has no clinical contact with the participants from assessment to end of intervention, and the assessors have no knowledge about the participant's randomization status at the end of intervention. Statistical analyses will be made with the two intervention groups coded as 'A' and 'B'. The results will remain coded when writing the outcome section of the relevant scientific articles, and the code will only be broken at the conclusion of this write-up.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a multi-center, two-arm, parallel group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled superiority study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Research Unit, Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2023

First Posted

April 27, 2023

Study Start

April 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2029

Last Updated

September 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD underlying results in publications related to the study will be shared, as well as all other collected data at a reasonable request - all in anonymized form.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be available from 6 months after the publication of results of the follow-up study. Data will discontinue to be available 5 years after the completion of the study in its entirety due to law-enforced deletion of primary data.
Access Criteria
IPD will be shared at reasonable request by any serious researcher who can procure a detailed protocol for the use of the data. Data will be shared for the use in publication of peer reviewed articles pertaining to effects of psychotherapy. Data will be shared via a secure VPN. Requests will be reviewed by the Project Investigator, Stine Bjerrum Moeller

Available IPD Datasets

Study Protocol Access
Statistical Analysis Plan Access
Informed Consent Form Access
Analytic Code Access

Locations