The Efficacy of Probiotics for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder Among Adult Males
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This three-armed, parallel-group, single-blind, multi-center randomized control trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplement compared with that of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in ameliorating alcohol craving and severity of alcohol use disorder (AUD) in patients diagnosed with AUD after 2 weeks of in-patient detoxification. In addition, this study also compares the efficacy of probiotic supplement and ACT to mitigate common comorbid of AUD (such as depression and anxiety symptoms); changes in event-related potential (ERP) on electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring which indicate reduce alcohol craving; and depreciate the serum level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) indicating lowering of systemic inflammation. In phase I of the study, 120 patients diagnosed with AUD (using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders 5th Edition or DSM-5) and 120 healthy controls will be recruited. The measured outcomes to be compared between patients with AUD and healthy non-AUD controls include ERP on EEG monitoring, serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), and the fecal microbiota content. Then, in phase II of the study, 120 AUD patients will be randomized into three groups of intervention in a 1:1:1 ratio (Lactobacillus sp. probiotic, ACT and placebo group; n = 40 per group). The participants in probiotic and placebo groups will then consumed the Lactobacillus sp. Probiotic and placebo 1 sachet once a day of probiotic and placebo, respectively for 12 weeks. While participants in ACT group will undergo training for ACT one session per week for 8 weeks. Outcome assessments will be performed across four time points, such as t0 = before intervention began, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began. The primary outcomes to be measured are the degree of alcohol craving, alcohol withdrawal, and severity of alcohol use disorder. While the secondary outcomes to be assessed are severity of comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms, serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), changes in ERP on EEG monitoring, and fecal microbiota content.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2026
CompletedApril 26, 2023
April 1, 2023
3 years
March 31, 2023
April 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test score across four time points
This questionnaire can screen drinkers from mild to severe.The reliability and validity of the Chinese version are 0.782. Factor analysis showed that indeed the Chinese version of the AUDIT comprised of three factors and had good convergent and discriminant validity. The scale consists of 10 questions, of which three relate to the amount and frequency of alcohol consumption, three relate to alcohol dependence and four involve in various problems caused by alcohol. The total score range from 0 to 40. The score of the scale ≥ 8 is positive. In general, those with high scores on the first three questions but low scores on the rest suggest serious harmful drinking; High scores in questions 4, 5 and 6 indicate alcohol dependence; High scores in the final section indicate that drinking has caused harm.
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised score across four time points
The scale is a standard tool for quantifying the severity of alcohol withdrawal symptoms. The reliability of the Chinese version of CIWA-Ar was good with Cronbach's α of 0.83. The total score range from 0 to 30. The total score \< 10 suggests mild withdrawal reaction. The score of 10 to 20 indicates moderate. And the total score of more than 20 is considered severe. A severe total score is associated with a risk of delirium tremens and seizures.
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale score across four time points
This questionnaire consists of five items to evaluate the severity of craving, including frequency, intensity, duration, difficulty of coping, and average craving degree. The reliability of the Chinese version of PACS was good at Cronbach's α of 0.97. Each item is scored in a seven-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, with 0 being none and 6 being extremely severe. Thus, the total score range from 0 to 30. The higher the total score, the greater is the degree of craving. The subjects will be asked to answer questions according to the situation in the past week.
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score across four time points
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score across four time points
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in event-related potential in EEG monitoring across four time points
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in serum tumor necrosis factor-α (in ng/mL) across four time points
At four time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began, and t3 = 24 weeks after intervention began
Change in fecal microbiota analysis across three time points
At three time points of assessment: t0 (baseline) = before starting intervention, t1 = 8 weeks after intervention began, and t2 = 12 weeks after intervention began
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Probiotic group
EXPERIMENTALProbiotics + conventional drug therapy: treatment includes conventional drug therapy\* (initial 2 weeks), then probiotics powder 2g, mixed into water or milk, dissolved and oral; 1 sachet per day for 12 weeks \*Conventional drug treatment: alcohol detoxification treatment was carried out at the early stage of admission, mainly with benzodiazepine replacement therapy, while adequate supplementation of B vitamins, strengthening symptomatic supportive treatment, and corresponding antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants or emotional stabilizers were given according to the condition. Benzodiazepines are gradually discontinued after withdrawal symptoms disappear (2 weeks).
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORACT + conventional drug therapy: treatment includes conventional drug therapy\* (initial 2 weeks), then 50 minutes, once a week ACT session for 8 weeks (8 sessions). \*Conventional drug treatment: alcohol detoxification treatment was carried out at the early stage of admission, mainly with benzodiazepine replacement therapy, while adequate supplementation of B vitamins, strengthening symptomatic supportive treatment, and corresponding antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants or emotional stabilizers were given according to the condition. Benzodiazepines are gradually discontinued after withdrawal symptoms disappear (2 weeks).
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo + conventional drug therapy: treatment includes conventional drug therapy\* (initial 2 weeks), then maltodextrin of the same weight as the test drug treatment group was mixed into water or milk and orally dissolved; 1 sachet per day for 12 weeks. \*Conventional drug treatment: alcohol detoxification treatment was carried out at the early stage of admission, mainly with benzodiazepine replacement therapy, while adequate supplementation of B vitamins, strengthening symptomatic supportive treatment, and corresponding antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants or emotional stabilizers were given according to the condition. Benzodiazepines are gradually discontinued after withdrawal symptoms disappear (2 weeks).
Interventions
The probiotic product contains good bacteria Lactobacillus sp. and primarily maltodextrin as carrier. Sachets of products containing the probiotic appear as light-yellow powder. The probiotic products are kept at storage temperature range below 30oC according to the condition recommended by the manufacturer.
The ACT session is initiated by building good therapeutic rapport with the subject and gather important information such as experiential avoidance, external barriers, fusion past, unworkable actions, and strength of the subject, followed by formulation of the case. The session may began with coaching subjects on acknowledging and accepting their unpleasant thoughts and feelings. The therapy will also focus on defusion to reduce behavioral avoidance of unpleasant thoughts and feelings by acknowledging them but focus on the values identified. Mindfulness is also practice to allow focus onto the present and surrounding to create awareness among the subjects that they are many things in the surrounding which is more enjoyable that we can enjoy rather than making effort to distract or change or avoid the unpleasant thoughts and feelings.
The placebo are in powder form prepare in sachet which is light-yellow in color and should be stored in temperature at below 30oC, which is similar to the appearance of the probiotic. Nevertheless, it contains only maltodextrin in same amount as in the placebo.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hospitalized patients diagnosed with untreated alcohol use disorder (confirmed by the diagnostic criteria of DSM-5).
- Male, age 18 to 55 years old, Han nationality, junior high school education or above, right-handed.
- Those with normal eyesight, including corrected vision(screened clinically).
You may not qualify if:
- The patient suffer from other mental illnesses (screen by DSM-V criteria).
- The patient has allergy reaction to medications use for conventional treatment of alcohol use disorder.
- The patient had a history of organic brain disease, a pacemaker, gastrointestinal surgery, or serious health problems.
- The patient had a history of seizures.
- The patient is complicated with severe physical disease.
- Patient has other drug dependence (except for nicotine dependence).
- The patient took drugs affecting intestinal flora 30 days before and during admission.
- The patient has participated in any other alcohol-related studies or trials within the past 30 days.
- Patients had use any prescription or over-the-counter drugs in the past 30 days that may affect mood or alcohol cravings.
- Male, age 18 to 55 years old, Han nationality, junior high school education or above, right-handed.
- No history of psychoactive substance abuse, except tobacco (screen with urine dipstick test).
- Those with normal eyesight, including corrected vision (screen clinically).
- No alcoholic beverages in the last 2 weeks.
- According to the WHO healthy alcohol consumption standard, the average intake of pure alcohol per week is less than 210 grams, or do not drink at all (screen clinically).
- Those who suffer from other mental illnesses (screen by DSM-V criteria).
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universiti Sains Malaysialead
- Xinxiang medical universitycollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Zhang B, Zhang R, Deng H, Cui P, Li C, Yang F, Leong Bin Abdullah MFI. Research protocol of the efficacy of probiotics for the treatment of alcohol use disorder among adult males: A comparison with placebo and acceptance and commitment therapy in a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 5;18(12):e0294768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294768. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38051740DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammad Farris Iman Leong Bin Abdullah, Dr Psych
Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization will be performed by the study statistician, who had no contact with the patients and not involve in the research project. The statistician is trained to randomize subjects who first enrol in the study into the three groups using computer system for randomization purpose. The allocation sequence will not be available to any member of the research team until databases had been completed and locked. Data collection will be performed by research assistants who were not involved in the study and do not know the objectives of the study. While data analysis will be carried out by the statisticians not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2023
First Posted
April 26, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
April 30, 2026
Study Completion
April 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04