RObotic Versus LAparoscopic Colectomy for DIverticulitis.
ROLADI
RObotic Vs LAparoscopic Colectomy for DIverticulitis. a Multicenter Observational Prospective Study.
1 other identifier
observational
1,450
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Over the last decade there has been a growing interest toward the application of robotic approach for diverticular disease. The evidence available on the literature showed that robotic approach, compared to the laparoscopic surgery, offers significant advantages in terms of conversion rate and shortened hospital stay for the treatment of diverticular disease. The investigators aimed at evaluating whether robotic colectomy may offer some advantages over the laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of diverticular disease by analyzing a one year multicenter prospective study. Primary objective is to evaluate if robotic approach reduce the rate of conversion to open approach compared to laparoscopic surgery. Secondary objective is to assess difference between the two approaches in terms of rate of intraoperative complication, postoperative morbidities (according with Clavien and Dindo Classification), hospital stay and at one year follow up. Inclusion criteria are: elective colectomy for complicated or non-complicated diverticular disease performed with laparoscopic or robotic approach and age between 18 and 90 years. Exclusion criteria are non-elective colectomy (emergency resection), open procedure, diverticular resection performed during other procedure (i.e. colectomy for cancer). Data will be collected in one year from the start of the study. Due to the lack of available evidence, it is impossible to draw definitive conclusions. With this study, the investigators hope to clarify the role of the robotic approach in the treatment of diverticular disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJanuary 29, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.8 years
April 11, 2023
January 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Conversion rate
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the robotic approach reduces the rate of conversion to open surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Intra - operative complications
One year
Operative time
One year
Complicated disease
One year
30 day Post - operative complications
One year
30-day Post - operative re-operation
One year
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Robotic surgery group
Patients with diverticular disease resected with a robotic approach.
Laparoscopic surgery group
Patients with diverticular disease resected with a laparoscopic approach.
Interventions
Patients are treated with a laparoscopic approach as the standard of care for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease, depending on the experience of the surgeon or institution.
Patients are treated with a robotic approach as the standard of care for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease, depending on the experience of the surgeon or institution.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with diverticular disease of the left colon with surgical indication.
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Elective or delayed urgency colorectal resection for left-sided DD
- Fully minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Urgent resection for DD
- Hybrid minimally invasive resection
- Conventional open resection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of General and Emergency Surgery. Misericordia Hospital. Director: Coratti Andrea, MD
Grosseto, Tuscany, 58100, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Giuliani G, Guerra F, Coletta D, Giuliani A, Salvischiani L, Tribuzi A, Caravaglios G, Genovese A, Coratti A. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic technique for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;37(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04038-x. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
PMID: 34599362BACKGROUNDLarkins K, Mohan H, Apte SS, Chen V, Rajkomar A, Larach JT, Smart P, Heriot A, Warrier S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;24(10):1105-1116. doi: 10.1111/codi.16227. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
PMID: 35723895BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD - Assistant surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2023
First Posted
April 25, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
January 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share