NCT00453830

Brief Summary

Aim: This is a prospective, randomized comparison of traditional open (OS) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated diverticular disease. The study is designed in order to minimize bias by standardizing the two procedures and blinding patients and nurses during the preoperative and early postoperative period. Hypothesis: A laparoscopic approach for sigmoidectomy has significant advantages over the open technique with respect to postoperative pain, duration of ileus, length of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity. Methods: Patients with complicated diverticular disease who are candidates for elective sigmoidectomy will be randomized the day before surgery, and anaesthetic technique and postoperative management will be standardized between groups. Surgeons with experience in both laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy will perform both types of procedures. At the end of the operation, identical, opaque wound dressings will be applied and left in place until postoperative day 4. Both patients and nursing staff will therefore be blinded to the type of surgical technique during the early postoperative period. Endpoints: A) Postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale at postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. B) Postoperative intake of systemic opiates (morphine) C) Duration of postoperative ileus, quantified by the interval in hours between the end of the procedure and passage of first stool. D) Duration of hospital stay. E) Surgical complications, such as wound infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding F) General medical complications, such as cardiopulmonary, pneumonia, and renal failure. Rationale: This study will determine whether a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is associated with significant clinical advantages over the traditional open approach when patients with complicated diverticular disease are blinded to the operative technique.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2005

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2007

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2007

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 18, 2009

Status Verified

February 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2007

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Diverticulitis; laparoscopy; short term outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative pain at days 1, 2 and 3

    7 days

  • Morphine requirements at days 1, 2 and 3

    4 days

  • Duration of postoperative ileus

    10 days

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Medical complications

    30 days

  • Surgical complications

    30 days

  • Duration of surgical procedure

    1 days

  • Duration of hospital stay

    2 months

Interventions

a laparoscopic 5 trocars approach for left colon mobilization, sigmoid colon transsection and intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis

Also known as: laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Informed consent
  • Diverticular disease of sigmoid colon documented by colonoscopy AND 2 episodes of uncomplicated diverticulitis, one at least being documented with CT scan OR 1 episode of complicated diverticulitis, i.e. perforation, with or without pericolic abscess or pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drain

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18
  • Associated colon cancer or any condition requiring extended colectomy
  • BMI \> 35
  • Emergency procedure
  • Use of opiates and/or analgesics within 48 hours preceding the surgical procedure
  • Patient unable to communicate in French, English or German
  • Any cognitive impairment (psychiatric disorder, Alzheimer's disease, etc.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Surgery

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Gervaz P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P, Huber O, Inan I. Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3373-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1728-8. Epub 2011 May 10.

  • Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dbb5a5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diverticulitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diverticular DiseasesGastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Philippe Morel, MD

    University Hospital Geneva - Department of Surgery

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2007

First Posted

March 29, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion

February 1, 2009

Study Completion

February 1, 2009

Last Updated

February 18, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-02

Locations