Laparoscopic Versus Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticular Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: This is a prospective, randomized comparison of traditional open (OS) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated diverticular disease. The study is designed in order to minimize bias by standardizing the two procedures and blinding patients and nurses during the preoperative and early postoperative period. Hypothesis: A laparoscopic approach for sigmoidectomy has significant advantages over the open technique with respect to postoperative pain, duration of ileus, length of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity. Methods: Patients with complicated diverticular disease who are candidates for elective sigmoidectomy will be randomized the day before surgery, and anaesthetic technique and postoperative management will be standardized between groups. Surgeons with experience in both laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy will perform both types of procedures. At the end of the operation, identical, opaque wound dressings will be applied and left in place until postoperative day 4. Both patients and nursing staff will therefore be blinded to the type of surgical technique during the early postoperative period. Endpoints: A) Postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale at postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. B) Postoperative intake of systemic opiates (morphine) C) Duration of postoperative ileus, quantified by the interval in hours between the end of the procedure and passage of first stool. D) Duration of hospital stay. E) Surgical complications, such as wound infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding F) General medical complications, such as cardiopulmonary, pneumonia, and renal failure. Rationale: This study will determine whether a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is associated with significant clinical advantages over the traditional open approach when patients with complicated diverticular disease are blinded to the operative technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 18, 2009
February 1, 2009
4.1 years
March 28, 2007
February 17, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative pain at days 1, 2 and 3
7 days
Morphine requirements at days 1, 2 and 3
4 days
Duration of postoperative ileus
10 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Medical complications
30 days
Surgical complications
30 days
Duration of surgical procedure
1 days
Duration of hospital stay
2 months
Interventions
a laparoscopic 5 trocars approach for left colon mobilization, sigmoid colon transsection and intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent
- Diverticular disease of sigmoid colon documented by colonoscopy AND 2 episodes of uncomplicated diverticulitis, one at least being documented with CT scan OR 1 episode of complicated diverticulitis, i.e. perforation, with or without pericolic abscess or pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drain
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18
- Associated colon cancer or any condition requiring extended colectomy
- BMI \> 35
- Emergency procedure
- Use of opiates and/or analgesics within 48 hours preceding the surgical procedure
- Patient unable to communicate in French, English or German
- Any cognitive impairment (psychiatric disorder, Alzheimer's disease, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Surgery
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Gervaz P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P, Huber O, Inan I. Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3373-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1728-8. Epub 2011 May 10.
PMID: 21556992DERIVEDGervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dbb5a5.
PMID: 20505508DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Philippe Morel, MD
University Hospital Geneva - Department of Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2007
First Posted
March 29, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 18, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02