Trial Of Neurostimulation Treatment and Investigation for Causes of Functional Motor Symptoms: a Pilot Study
TONICS
Trial of Neurostimulation Treatment and Investigation for Causes of Functional Motor Symptoms: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex to investigate efficacy in improving motor FND symptoms and to make a preliminary investigation of predictors of response to TMS and potential mechanisms of action.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFebruary 2, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.2 years
January 16, 2023
January 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
immediately before treatment 1
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
immediately after treatment 1
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
immediately before treatment 2
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
immediately after treatment 2
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
one-month follow-up
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
Adapted Patient Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale rated by the patient is a 7-point scale of improvement from 'very much improved' to 'very much worse'. 'Very much improved' means a better outcome.
three-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (76)
Adapted Outcome Assessor Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
immediately before treatment 1
Adapted Outcome Assessor Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
immediately after treatment 1
Adapted Outcome Assessor Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
immediately before treatment 2
Adapted Outcome Assessor Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
immediately after treatment 2
Adapted Outcome Assessor Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale
one-month follow-up
- +71 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe location and number of pulses will be set. The intensity of stimulation will be felt by the subject. 120 stimuli - including at least 20 supra (motor) threshold stimuli causing movement of the affected limb.
Inactive/control arm
SHAM COMPARATORThe location and number of pulses have been set at the same as the active treatment. The intensity of stimulation will necessarily be less but will still result in a stimulus that is felt by the subject to maximise chances of successful blinding. 120 stimuli - no stimuli of sufficient intensity to produce movement.
Interventions
TMS is a form of 'non-invasive brain stimulation', i.e. it is a way of stimulating the brain from outside the head. It works by holding a magnetic coil approximately the size of a small side plate against the head (it rests on the scalp) which then delivers magnetic pulses that stimulate the underlying brain. It was developed over 30 years ago and has been increasingly used to treat a number of neurological and psychiatric disorders. It is considered a relatively safe and generally well-tolerated treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of motor FND (i.e. presenting with weakness of at least one limb) made by consultant neurologist and/or neuropsychiatrist.
- Age ≥18yrs.
- Ability to give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Epilepsy (or considered high risk of epilepsy from medical history).
- Other contraindication to TMS (e.g. cochlear implants, metallic intracranial clips/surgery in last 12 months).
- Comorbid organic neurological condition.
- Pain as primary symptom.
- Previous treatment with TMS (for any condition).
- Non-fluent English speakers (if unable to accurately complete self-report questionnaires).
- Major mental health disorder: current diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; current drug/alcohol dependence.
- History of factitious disorder.
- Currently involved in another trial.
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King's College Londonlead
- King's College Hospital NHS Trustcollaborator
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience
London, London, se5 8af, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy Nicholson, MBBS, PhD
King's College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2023
First Posted
April 25, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
February 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Personally identifiable or sensitive individual participant data will not be shared to protect the participants' confidentiality.