Stress Toolbox for Healthcare Providers in Mexico
3 other identifiers
interventional
2,315
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized wait-list clinical trial is to test in patient facing Mexican healthcare providers the efficacy of the Integrated Toolbox for Healthcare Providers (ISTH) on psychological functioning, well-being, occupational performance, and peripheral inflammation. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does assignment to the ISTH predict reduced psychological distress and increased well-being?
- Does assignment to the ISTH predict improved occupational outcomes and social-emotional competencies? Participants will be randomly assigned to either the ISTH, a 12-week synchronous and app-based well-being training or to a wait-list control condition and complete assessments 8 times over the nine-month study period. Researchers will compare the ISTH and the wait-list control group across time to evaluate ISTH impacts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 29, 2025
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
12 months
February 28, 2023
December 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline on Psychological distress
Z-scored aggregate of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression (a) and Anxiety (b) Scales, and the NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress v2.0 (c). A \& B: 8 item self-report scales. C: 10-item self-report. Higher scores indicate greater symptoms of psychological distress.
baseline, after weeks 1, 3, 5, 8 ,12 (post intervention), 24 (3 months post-intervention), and 36 (six-months post-intervention)
Change from baseline in well-being
The World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a short self-reported measure of current mental well-being (time frame the previous two weeks). The scale score range is 0 (lowest possible well-being) to 25 (highest possible well-being.
baseline, after weeks 1, 3, 5, 8 ,12 (post intervention), 24 (3 months post-intervention), and 36 (six-months post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Act With Awareness subscale
baseline, after weeks 1, 3, 8, and 12 (post intervention)
Change From Baseline on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Non-react to Inner Experience subscale
baseline, after weeks 3, 5, 8, and 12 (post intervention)
Change from baseline on Healthy Minds Index subscales (awareness, connection, insight, and purpose)
baseline, after weeks 1, 3, 5, 8, and 12 (post intervention)
Change from baseline on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index empathic concern subscale
baseline, after weeks 5, 8, and 12 (post intervention)
Change from baseline on the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire positive reappraisal subscale
baseline, after weeks 3, 5, 8, and 12 (post intervention)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline on peripheral inflammation assessed via dried blood spots (CRP, IL-6, IL-10, TNFalpha)
Baseline, after week 12 (post-intervention), and after week 24 (three-month follow-up)
Change from baseline on patient reports of satisfaction
Baseline and after weeks 12 (post-intervention) and 24 (three-month follow-up)
Change from prior year to year after intervention on absenteeism.
Absenteeism year after week 24 assessment.
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Integrated Stress Toolbox for Healthcare Providers (ISTH)
EXPERIMENTALA 12-week synchronous and app-based well-being training that involves weekly 2-hour sessions for weeks 1-8 and at week 12, along with 12-weeks of app-based content delivered through a special version of the Healthy Minds Program app.
Wait-list control
NO INTERVENTIONThe wait-list control group will continue with business as usual and receive the ISTH after the last data collection point.
Interventions
The ISTH is a 12-week meditation-based well-being training. In weeks 1-8, participants engage in weekly 2-hour class sessions that are recorded and posted on a private Youtube channel for one week. There is a final two-hour session at week 12. In-class learning is augmented and extended through content in a special version of the Healthy Minds Program smartphone app that participants are asked to use on a daily basis throughout the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years old
- Employee in a participating healthcare system in a participating Mexican State
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years old
- Not in a participant healthcare system in a participating state
- Does not work in a qualifying healthcare provider role
- Does not have regular access to reliable internet and/or a smartphone capable of downloading the Healthy Minds Program app
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Campeche State
All, Campeche, Mexico
Coahuila State
All, Coahuila, Mexico
Jalisco State
All, Jalisco, Mexico
Nuevo Leon State
All, Nuevo León, Mexico
Querétaro State
All, Querétaro, Mexico
Sonora State
All, Sonora, Mexico
Oaxaca State
Oaxaca City, Mexico
Related Publications (12)
Pilkonis PA, Choi SW, Reise SP, Stover AM, Riley WT, Cella D; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):263-83. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411667. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
PMID: 21697139BACKGROUNDCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PMID: 6668417BACKGROUNDBech, P. (2004). Measuring the dimension of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. Quality of Life Newsletter, 15-16.
BACKGROUNDMaslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Mountain View, CA: CPP. Inc., and Davies-Black.
BACKGROUNDBaer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JM. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):329-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
PMID: 18310597BACKGROUNDDavis, M. H. (1980). Interpersonal reactivity index.
BACKGROUNDGarnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European journal of psychological assessment, 23(3), 141-149.
BACKGROUNDMccullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):112-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112.
PMID: 11811629BACKGROUNDSteger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of counseling psychology, 53(1), 80.
BACKGROUNDMehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, Stewart A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048230. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
PMID: 23133619BACKGROUNDGilbert, P., Catarino, F., Duarte, C., Matos, M., Kolts, R., Stubbs, J., ... & Basran, J. (2017). The development of compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 4, 1-24.
BACKGROUNDHirshberg MJ, Davidson RJ, Velarde Arrisueno LB, Olvera Puentes JM, Bardalez XM, Gonzalez BS, Goldberg SB, Chernicoff LI; HCP-Well Study Group. Digital Well-Being Training With Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 18;185(10):1248-56. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3888. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40824577DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leandro Chernicoff, MS
AtentaMente
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessments will be collected online or through professional data collection service (for dried blood spots and patient satisfaction reports) that will be blind to condition assignment. The investigators responsible for data analysis will be blind to condition assignment until after primary analyses are complete.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2023
First Posted
March 14, 2023
Study Start
April 4, 2023
Primary Completion
March 31, 2024
Study Completion
September 29, 2025
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After publication of primary outcomes paper
- Access Criteria
- Data will be posted on a public repository (osf.io; e.g., to replicate published analyses) but use of the data in future publications will be at the discretion of the research team.
Prespecified hypotheses and analyses plans will be preregistered on osf.io prior to recruitment. De-identified study data will be posted on osf.io after publication of trial analyses. Code used in all publications will be available by request.