Comparison of the Accuracy and Precision of a Zero Heat Flux Thermometer (SpotOn) Versus Pulmonary Artery Temperature.
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, we aim to compare the core temperature measured with two noninvasive ZHF thermometers and a urinary bladder thermometer against a gold standard blood temperature measured in the pulmonary artery in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. Additionally we intend to compare the reproducibility of the ZHF measurements by using two devices simultaneously in each patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2023
CompletedMarch 17, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.1 years
February 12, 2023
March 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
ZHF temperature right side versus PAC temperature.
ZHF temperature measured on the right side of the forehead versus PAC temperature.
Perioperatively
ZHF temperature left side versus PAC temperature.
ZHF temperature measured on the left side of the forehead versus PAC temperature.
Perioperatively
ZHF temperature right side versus ZHF temperature left side
ZHF temperature measured on the right side of the forehead versus ZHF temperature measured on the left side of the forehead
Perioperatively
Bladder temperature versus PAC temperature
Bladder temperature versus PAC temperature
Perioperatively
Study Arms (1)
100 adult patients of both genders scheduled for cardiac surgery
100 adult patients of both genders scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB for either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR) or CABG + AVR.
Interventions
Comparison of the accuracy and precision of a Zero Heat Flux Thermometer (SpotOn) Versus Pulmonary Artery Temperature Measurement
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients of both genders scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB for either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR) or CABG + AVR
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients of both genders scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB for either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), mitral valve replacement (MVR) or CABG + AVR
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- Aalborg University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Denmark
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carsten M. Pedersen, CRNA, MScN
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical nurse specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2023
First Posted
February 21, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03