NCT05726344

Brief Summary

Colonoscopy is the gold standard in bowel assessment when there is suspicion of colon and rectum pathology. Bowel cleansing is necessary to ensure an optimal visualization of colonic mucosa, allowing this form of detection and removal of polyps. Nowadays international recommendations have multiple bowel preparations. There are differences among them regarding adherence, tolerance and adverse effects. Lactulose (LAC) is widely used in treating constipation. However, there are some randomized clinical assays using LAC as bowel preparation with excellent results according to bowel preparation and tolerance scales. Adherence to bowel preparation significantly affects the result in the endoscopic study. Safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) formulations has been validated in several studies, it presents little severe side effects and the advantage of its applicability to patients with several comorbidities (heart, liver and kidney without water deprivation). However, its main disadvantage lies in the need to ingest large amounts of liquid (3-4L), generating intolerance thereto in 15%-45% of patients. Bowel cleansing preparation with PEG is widely used in clinical practice. Considering that according to international studies reporting better tolerance and adherence with LAC; it is suggested to compare the level of bowel preparation, tolerance and adherence between two groups with LAC and PEG.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 10, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 13, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 13, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 27, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 24, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Compare lactulose vs. Polyethylene Glycol as bowel cleansing preparation for colonoscopy

    Compare the level of bowel preparation (by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale) between two groups with lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol. The minimum and maximum value is 0 and 9, respectively. A proper preparation is consider a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥ 2 scores in each colonic segment. Unsuitable preparation a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \< 2 scores in any of the segments. Score 0: is considered a segment of unprepared colon with mucosa that cannot be observed given the presence of solid stool which does not disappear after cleansing. Score 1: part of the colonic mucosa is observed; other areas cannot be suitably assessed given the presence of staining, residual matter and/or opaque liquid. Score 2: little remaining residual matter and small matter fragments which do not prevent correct visualization of colonic mucosa in said segment. Score 3: colonic mucosa which can be entirely observed with no residual matter nor small fragments of matter and opaque liquid.

    6 months

  • Establish Boston Bowel Preparation Scale inter and intra-observer variability

    Two researchers shall review the endoscopic study videos and they shall complete the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale inter-observer questionnaire. Results obtained by the endoscopist in charge of the study and the observers shall be compared so as to establish inter-observer variability. Researchers shall analyze one month later again all colonoscopies recorded thus establishing Boston Bowel Preparation Scale of each endoscopy. Then results previously established shall be compared so as to establish intra-observer variability. The minimum and maximum value is 0 and 9, respectively. A proper preparation is consider a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥ 2 scores in each colonic segment. Unsuitable preparation a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \< 2 scores in any of the segments.

    7 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Assess tolerance between lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.

    6 months

  • Assess adherence between lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.

    6 months

  • Assess side effects between lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.

    6 months

  • Establish colonoscopy global adenoma detection rate with lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.

    6 months

  • Establish colonoscopy cecal intubation rate in with lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Lactulose group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients participating in the study shall go on with their usual diet prior to colonoscopy. Three days before avoid consuming fruits, vegetables, seeds and cereals. A low residue soft and liquid diet is allowed. The day before the study, the group receiving lactulose shall take 4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) the day before the study at 6pm. Then, at 8pm a bottle of 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose shall be dissolved in 600 mL of water and all contents (850 mL) shall be taken in 2 hours. At 10pm they have to drink 2 liters still water.

Drug: Lactulose

Polyethylene glycol group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients participating in the study shall go on with their usual diet prior to colonoscopy. Three days before avoid consuming fruits, vegetables, seeds and cereals. A low residue soft and liquid diet is allowed. The day before the study, the group receiving polyethylene glycol (PEG) should take 4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) at 4pm. Then, at 6pm, 3 bottles of PEG (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) shall be dissolved in 3 liters of water (1 bottle per liter) and they shall take half the preparation, that is 1 liter and a half in 2 hours. At 10pm they shall take the remaining contents in 2 hours.

Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 3350

Interventions

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose + 600 mL of water + 2 L of water

Also known as: Bisacodyl 20 mg, Water 600 mL
Lactulose group

4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 3 bottles Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) + 3 L of water

Also known as: Bisacodyl 20 mg, Water 3 L
Polyethylene glycol group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Patients over 18 years with no bowel surgical procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients willingly deciding not to enter into the study
  • Pregnant women
  • Patient with colonic resections and/or ileostomies
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Colonic optimization by prior colonoscopy with poor preparation
  • Suspected intestinal occlusion or perforation, intussusception
  • Patient with melenas
  • Oral iron intake in the past 10 days
  • Emergency colonoscopy
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the components comprised in preparations.
  • Diabetics
  • Chronic kidney disease in dialysis
  • Uncorrected severe dystonias
  • Severe psychiatric illness (schizophrenia)
  • Low IQ to understand bowel preparation
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Clinicas

Montevideo, Uruguay

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

LactuloseBisacodylWaterpolyethylene glycol 3350

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DisaccharidesOligosaccharidesPolysaccharidesCarbohydratesSugarsCresolsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsHydroxidesAlkaliesInorganic ChemicalsAnionsIonsElectrolytesOxidesOxygen Compounds

Study Officials

  • IGNACIO MORATORIO, MD

    HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • MARIA B RUSSO, MD

    HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • FLORENCIA RODRIGUEZ, MD

    HOSPITAL DE CLINICAS

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Triple blind (endoscopist, researchers and statistician) randomized clinical assay.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: An analytical, experimental, prospective study, specifically a triple blind randomized clinical assay (endoscopist, researchers and statistician) in which a bowel preparation is compared for colonoscopy with lactulose vs. Polyethylene Glycol.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2023

First Posted

February 13, 2023

Study Start

February 10, 2023

Primary Completion

December 13, 2023

Study Completion

December 13, 2023

Last Updated

December 27, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan and Informed Consent Form

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
ENDED THE TRIAL

Locations