Evaluation of an Oral Sodium Sulfate Solution for Patients With Prior Difficult or Incomplete Cleansing
OSS
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This case series aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of Oral Sulfate Solution (OSS) in patients who had previously experienced poor colonoscopy preparation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedApril 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
8 months
September 18, 2023
April 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness
The primary outcome is proportion of patients with an adequate preparation (Boston preparation scale 6 or greater, with no section less than 2).
1-2 days
Study Arms (1)
oral sodium sulfate
OTHEROSS is a colon cleansing agent administered in a split dose fashion, inducing diarrhea by drawing water into the intestine.
Interventions
All participants enrolled in this study will use Oral Sodium Sulfate as their bowel cleansing agent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients Age 18 to 80 inclusive
- Able to read and understand the English language
- History of poor bowel prep defined as:
- Required extensive washing, as noted in the narrative of the endoscopist report.
- Inadequate preparation
- Endoscopist recommended shorter interval surveillance due to poor prep
- adequate for polyps \>5mm but not smaller lesions
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have inflammatory bowel disease
- Patients with ileus or bowel obstruction
- Patients with history of colorectal resection
- Patients receiving combined upper and lower endoscopies
- Patients with ascites
- Patients with previously documented severe renal impairment
- Unable to provide consent
- Pregnant or lactating female (females of child-bearing potential will undergo urine pregnancy testing)
- Patients who have had a recent myocardial infarction(\<6months)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lawrence Charles Hookeylead
- Pendopharmcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2, Canada
Hotel Dieu Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L5G2, Canada
Related Publications (7)
Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. No abstract available.
PMID: 25239068BACKGROUNDOldfield EC 4th, Johnson DA, Rex DK. Prescribing Colonoscopy Bowel Preparations: Tips for Maximizing Outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 1;118(5):761-764. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002110. Epub 2022 Dec 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 36573902BACKGROUNDWang CN, Yang R, Hookey L. Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;3(3):111-119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
PMID: 32395685BACKGROUNDHookey LC, Vanner S. A review of current issues underlying colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;21(2):105-11. doi: 10.1155/2007/634125.
PMID: 17299615BACKGROUNDAnastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T, Colman S, Cleveland MV, Pelham RW. A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2993-3006. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4214-2. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
PMID: 27278957BACKGROUNDRex DK, DiPalma JA, McGowan J, Cleveland Mv. A comparison of oral sulfate solution with sodium picosulfate: magnesium citrate in split doses as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.329. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
PMID: 25028274BACKGROUNDYang HJ, Park SK, Kim JH, Im JP, Yeom DH, Seo GS, Park DI. Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;32(1):12-18. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13477.
PMID: 27349220BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lawrence Hookey
Queen's University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2023
First Posted
September 25, 2023
Study Start
October 11, 2023
Primary Completion
May 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
April 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share