Lidocaine Improves Satisfaction in Labiaplasty
anesthetics
Does Lidocaine Reduce Patient Moving Which Affect the Procedure Proceeding and Improves Surgeon Satisfaction in Labiaplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
1.Written informed consent must be obtained before any study specific procedures are undertaken.Qualified participants were identified at the pre-anesthesia evaluation clinic or ward. 2.80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-II in our medical center scheduled to undergo elective surgery for hypertrophy of labia minor with MAC. Patients were randomized 1:1 into the Group 1 (normal saline) or Group 2 (lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/hr, ideal body weight) by using a table of random, computer-generated digits in sealed and numbered envelopes by an anesthesiologist. All surgical procedure was performed by the same surgeon and the anesthetic data was recorded by a nurse anesthetist. All patients were fasted overnight before the procedure, and no medications were allowed before induction of anesthesia. Standard monitoring, such as non-invasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiography (lead II), pulse oximetry, end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (EtCO2) was applied for each patient. Participants were pre-oxygenated and adequately maintained with 100% oxygen at 3 L/min via a nasal cannula during the entire procedure. During anesthesia induction, all patients received intravenous fentanyl 0.5-1 mcg/kg, continuous infusion of propofol with target-controlled infusion (TCI; Fresenius Orchestra Primea; Fresenius Kabi AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) with the Ce of 4.0 mcg/mL and parecoxib. In addition, continuous infusion of equal volume normal saline and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/hr (ideal body weight) in group I and 2, respectively. In all patients, maintenance of the Ce of propofol was adjusted upward or downward by 0.5 mcg/mL to keep patient adequate sedation with acceptable pain (remaining moveless). If upward 2 times of propofol and the patient still move which affect the surgical procedure, fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg was prescribed, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) within baseline levels. As soon as the last suture, the propofol and lidocaine were discontinued. After the procedure, all patients were sent to the PACU for further care under clear consciousness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedFebruary 10, 2023
November 1, 2022
11 months
November 30, 2022
February 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the alteration of total usage of propofol and fentanyl
Comparing the treatment group with the control group the total infusion dose of propofol sedation and bolus intravenous fentanyl use perioperatively
about 1 hour (perioperatively)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
the alterations of total adverse events
up to 1 hour
postoperative patient's satisfaction after anesthesia
1 hour after the surgery.
the surgeon's satisfaction after anesthesia service
immediately after the surgery
Study Arms (2)
lidocaine infusion
EXPERIMENTALintravenous lidocaine infusion 1.5mg/kg/hr (ideal body weight) during labiaplasty
normal saline infusion
PLACEBO COMPARATORequal volume of normal saline infusion during labiaplasty
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 20-80 years old
- ASA score I-II
- receiving labiaplasty
You may not qualify if:
- age \< 20 years or older than 80 years
- ASA score more than II
- height \<152 and \>213 cm
- body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
- allergy to midazolam and lidocaine
- chronic use of opioid drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zhi-Fu Wu, MD
Kaohsiung Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2022
First Posted
January 31, 2023
Study Start
February 15, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
February 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-11