NCT01311102

Brief Summary

The study hypothesis is that infusion of 2% lidocaine at the time of IUD placement will reduce pain scores related to that procedure. In a double blinded randomized trial of 60 women receiving either normal saline or lidocaine infused through an endometrial aspirator, pain scores will be obtained for each step of the IUD placement procedure and for the total experience.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2008

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 21, 2010

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 5, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 21, 2010

Results QC Date

October 14, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Pain scoreIUD placement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain Scores During Overall IUD Placement

    Pain score on 0-9 scale obtained just before the patient left the examination room; with 0 being "no pain" and 9 being "worst pain in life."

    Before patient left the examination room at conclusion of procedure

  • Pain During Tenaculum Placement

    Pain score on 0-9 scale for tenaculum placement (without anesthesia); with 0 being "no pain" and 9 being "worst pain in life." Taken to adjust for different pain thresholds among subjects

    Immediately following tenaculum placement

  • Pain Measurement During Liquid Infusion/Sounding

    After liquid infused into three parts of the endometrial cavity: in the lower one third, the middle, and at the top of the cavity. Pain was scored on a 0-9 scale; with 0 being "no pain" and 9 being "worst pain in life."

    Recorded at the end of the infusion

  • Pain During IUD Placement

    IUD was inserted following the manufacturer's instructions, and a pain score was immediately obtained. Pain was scored on 0-9 scale; with 0 being "no pain" and 9 being "worst pain in life."

    Immediately after IUD placement

Study Arms (2)

2% Lidocaine liquid

EXPERIMENTAL

1.33cc of 2% liquid lidocaine infused in endo cervix and endometrium

Drug: Lidocaine

Normal Saline

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

1.33cc of normal saline infused in endo cervix and endometrium

Drug: Normal Saline

Interventions

1.33 cc 2% liquid lidocaine

Also known as: Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Xylocaine
2% Lidocaine liquid

1.33cc normal saline

Also known as: Sodium chloride
Normal Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women eligible for IUD insertion
  • Willing to give consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Contraindications to IUD use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Women's Health Care Clinic

Torrance, California, 90502, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Dogan E, Celiloglu M, Sarihan E, Demir A. Anesthetic effect of intrauterine lidocaine plus naproxen sodium in endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):347-51. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109519.74229.30.

    PMID: 14754707BACKGROUND
  • Trolice MP, Fishburne C Jr, McGrady S. Anesthetic efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine for endometrial biopsy: a randomized double-masked trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):345-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00557-8.

    PMID: 10711541BACKGROUND
  • Gupta N, Ghosh B, Mittal S. Comparison of oral naproxen and intrauterine lignocaine instillation for pain relief during hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Sep;102(3):284-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

    PMID: 18603250BACKGROUND
  • Lau WC, Tam WH, Lo WK, Yuen PM. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of transcervical intrauterine local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):610-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13301.x.

    PMID: 10826574BACKGROUND
  • Guney M, Oral B, Bayhan G, Mungan T. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain relief during saline solution infusion sonohysterography: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.02.007.

    PMID: 17478360BACKGROUND
  • Edelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Jensen JT. Four percent intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194204.71925.4a.

    PMID: 16449111BACKGROUND
  • Hui SK, Lee L, Ong C, Yu V, Ho LC. Intrauterine lignocaine as an anaesthetic during endometrial sampling: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. BJOG. 2006 Jan;113(1):53-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00812.x.

    PMID: 16398772BACKGROUND
  • Edelman A, Nichols MD, Leclair C, Astley S, Shy K, Jensen JT. Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management in first-trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127981.53911.0e.

    PMID: 15172863BACKGROUND
  • Frishman GN, Spencer PK, Weitzen S, Plosker S, Shafi F. The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1261-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127370.66704.f5.

    PMID: 15172862BACKGROUND
  • Costello MF, Horrowitz S, Steigrad S, Saif N, Bennett M, Ekangaki A. Transcervical intrauterine topical local anesthetic at hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03362-9.

    PMID: 12414003BACKGROUND
  • Guney M, Oral B, Mungan T. Efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine for removal of a "lost" intrauterine device: a randomized, controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):119-23. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223201.42144.80.

    PMID: 16816065BACKGROUND
  • Nelson AL, Fong JK. Intrauterine infusion of lidocaine does not reduce pain scores during IUD insertion. Contraception. 2013 Jul;88(1):37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Jan 2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

LidocaineSaline SolutionSodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

This was a small pilot study, so may have missed small differences in pain score. Based on the results obtained, a sample size of 418 subjects would be needed to detect a statistically significant difference in the pain scores.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Anita Nelson
Organization
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Anita L Nelson, M.D.

    Women's Health Care Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2010

First Posted

March 9, 2011

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 5, 2014

Results First Posted

February 5, 2014

Record last verified: 2013-12

Locations