Efficacy of IV Lidocaine at Alleviating Pain Associated With Propofol Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sedation
Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine at Alleviating Pain Associated With Propofol Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedural Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This protocol describes a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of lidocaine at reducing pain associated wiht propofol infusion for short-term deep sedation in children. Patients will be randomized to receive either placebo (saline) or one of two dosing regimens of IV lidocaine prior to initiating propofol infusion. The efficacy of the differing lidocaine doses will be compared to determine the minimum dose required to safely achieve alleviation of pain. We hypothesize that premedicating with lidocaine will significantly decrease pain experienced by pediatric patients receiving propofol for outpatient sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain
Started Feb 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 27, 2015
CompletedFebruary 27, 2015
February 1, 2015
2.9 years
November 5, 2008
January 23, 2013
February 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximal Pain/Discomfort
FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) Pain assessment scale was administered by a trained observer. The patient's parent documented maximum distress using a 100-mm visual analog scale where "0" represented "no pain" and 100 (the furthest point to the left) represented the worst pain ever.
during initial 3 minute propofol infusion
Study Arms (3)
Group A
PLACEBO COMPARATORSaline
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORLidocaine 0.25 mg/kg
Group C
ACTIVE COMPARATORLidocaine 0.5 mg/kg
Interventions
A blood pressure cuff is placed with its distal-most margin 10 cm proximal to the intravenous catheter insertion site and is inflated to 40 mmHg of pressure greater than the patient's pre-procedure systolic blood pressure. Subjects will receive saline placebo IV (Group A) prior to initiating propofol infusion. Five minutes after administration of the study agent, tourniquet pressure is released and propofol infusion will be immediately initiated.
A blood pressure cuff is placed with its distal-most margin 10 cm proximal to the intravenous catheter insertion site and is inflated to 40 mmHg of pressure greater than the patient's pre-procedure systolic blood pressure. Subjects will receive lidocaine 0.25 mg/kg IV (Group B) prior to initiating propofol infusion. Five minutes after administration of the study agent, tourniquet pressure is released and propofol infusion will be immediately initiated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for painless diagnostic procedures
- are ASA I or ASA II
You may not qualify if:
- have an indwelling central venous catheter
- have received an analgesic or sedative medication in the previous four hours prior to enrollment
- have an underlying chronic disorder that would impact on their ability to express distress when in painful or otherwise anxiety-provoking situations
- known hypersensitivity to lidocaine or any component of the formulation
- hypersensitivity to another local anesthetic of the amide type
- Adam-Stokes syndrome
- severe degrees of SA, AV, or intraventricular heart block
- allergy to corn-related products
- contraindication to propofol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akron Children's Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44308, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
No complications or adverse reactions were associated with either study drug dose.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael D. Reed, Pharm.D.
- Organization
- Akron Children's Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Norman C Christopher, MD
Akron Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pharm.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2008
First Posted
November 6, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 27, 2015
Results First Posted
February 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02