Epidural Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Monitoring the Effect of Epidural Stimulation on Sensorimotor and Autonomic Functions in Chronic Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Investigators propose to demonstrate that epidural stimulation (ES) can be used to recover significant levels of autonomic control of cardiovascular, urinary and sexual function as well as the ability to voluntarily control leg movements below the injury level. This intervention would provide an immediate therapeutic alternative to individuals who now have no recourse for treatment. In addition investigators suggest to prove on functional magnetic resonance imaging if there are some significant changes before and after the stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.9 years
December 2, 2022
March 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Brain functional connectivity
Researchers want to describe if there are some changes on functional MRI of the spinal cord and brain before and after stimulation. With functional MRI in rest and task condition, the functional connectivity (FC) is examined.
1 year after implantation
Change from baseline of lower extremity independence time during after 1 year of stimulation
Researchers will measure the amount of time individuals are able to stand without manual assistance (independently).
1 year after stimulation (360 training sessions)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in trunk stability restoration
6 month and 1 year after implantation
Neurogenic bladder symptoms will be measured using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS).
3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Sexual function as measured by the Sexual Function Questionnaire
3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Change in sense of wellbeing as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire
3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
Symptoms of spasticity will be measured by Modified Ashworth spasticity test
3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with chronic spinal cord injury
EXPERIMENTAL80 sessions each of epidural spinal cord stimulation for 1) autonomic functions 2) voluntary movement; and 3) standing
Interventions
Device: 5-6-5 Specify electrode Device: Restore Advance Pulse Generator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- non-progressive SCI with complete motor paralysis below T1; American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B
- years of age;
- longer than 2 years post injury;
- stable medical condition
- unable to voluntarily move all single joints of the legs;
- spinal cort lesion between C7 and Th10
You may not qualify if:
- ventilator dependent;
- painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, contracture, or pressure sore that might interfere with training;
- clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse;
- cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder, or renal disease unrelated to SCI;
- severe anemia (Hgb\<8 g/dl) or hypovolemia; and HIV or AIDS related illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UH Motol
Prague, 15000, Czechia
Related Publications (7)
Angeli CA, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP, Harkema SJ. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014 May;137(Pt 5):1394-409. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu038. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PMID: 24713270BACKGROUNDHarkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferreira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1938-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3. Epub 2011 May 19.
PMID: 21601270BACKGROUNDGerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
PMID: 26077679BACKGROUNDWagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PMID: 30382197BACKGROUNDZhang H, Liu Y, Zhou K, Wei W, Liu Y. Restoring Sensorimotor Function Through Neuromodulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Progress and Remaining Challenges. Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 14;15:749465. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.749465. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34720867BACKGROUNDChoi EH, Gattas S, Brown NJ, Hong JD, Limbo JN, Chan AY, Oh MY. Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2021 Dec;16(12):2367-2375. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.313017.
PMID: 33907008BACKGROUNDPena Pino I, Hoover C, Venkatesh S, Ahmadi A, Sturtevant D, Patrick N, Freeman D, Parr A, Samadani U, Balser D, Krassioukov A, Phillips A, Netoff TI, Darrow D. Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00035. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32714156BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jiri Kriz, MD, PhD
UH Motol - spinal cord unit
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2022
First Posted
January 19, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03