NCT05267951

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of non-invasive (transcutaneous) closed-loop electrical spinal cord stimulation for recovery of upper limb function (Aim 1) and spasticity (Aim 2) following spinal cord injury.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Oct 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress98%
Oct 2022Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 12, 2022

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

October 15, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change from baseline- Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation, and Prehension version 2

    Measurement of upper limb strength, sensation, qualitative prehension, and quantitative prehension (range 0-188, higher score mean better outcome)

    "Repeated measurements once every two weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test

    Measures unilateral and bilateral hand and arm function (range 0-128, higher score mean better outcome)

    "Repeated measurements once every two weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- Grip and Pinch Force

    Grip and pinch force measurement using a dynamometer (higher score mean better outcome)

    "Repeated measurements once every two weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- Modified Ashworth Scale

    Clinician administered assessment of spasticity (range 0-4, lower score mean better outcome)

    "Repeated measurements once every two weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change from baseline- International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury - Motor Score

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury - Sensory Score

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- International Standards of Autonomic Functions after Spinal Cord Injury

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- H-Reflex

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Change from baseline- World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • Change from baseline- Spinal Cord Injury - Functional Index Short-Form

    "Baseline"/"At the end of each treatment arm"/"Through study completion"

  • Change from baseline- International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Basic Data Set.v.2.1

    "Repeated measurements once every eight weeks throughout the study, an average of 10 months".

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Open-loop Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous stimulation

Device: Open-loop StimulationOther: Functional Task Practice

Close-loop Stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Intended movement-based stimulation.

Device: Close-loop StimulationOther: Functional Task Practice

Interventions

Spinal cord stimulation will be applied continuously over the skin throughout the intervention session.

Open-loop Stimulation

Spinal cord stimulation will start and stop based on the signals that come from the sensors placed on upper limb muscle surfaces.

Close-loop Stimulation

Exercise therapy consists of repeated functional hand and arm movements

Also known as: Intensive exercise therapy
Close-loop StimulationOpen-loop Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • has cervical (C8 or higher), incomplete (American Spinal Cord Injury Impairment Scale - C or D) traumatic spinal cord injury, minimum 1-year post-injury
  • has difficulty with hand functions in activities of daily living (e.g., dressing, grooming, feeding)
  • stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or autonomic dysreflexia that would contraindicate participation in upper extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
  • capable of performing simple cued motor tasks
  • has ability to attend intervention/functional task training and assessment sessions 3 times/week
  • has adequate social support to participate in all intervention and baseline/follow-up assessment sessions throughout 40 weeks.
  • has ability to read and speak English

You may not qualify if:

  • dependent on ventilation support
  • has implanted stimulator (e.g., pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator, cochlear implant, etc.) or baclofen pump
  • has metallic devices and implants in the head (e.g., deep brain stimulators, aneurysm clips/coils, and stents, vagus nerve stimulators)
  • has a history or current signs/symptoms of syringomyelia (progressive pain, muscle weakness, and/or sensory loss; deterioration of bowel/bladder function)
  • has autoimmune etiology of spinal cord dysfunction/injury
  • has received botulinum toxin injections in upper extremity muscles in the prior 6 months
  • has tendon transfer or nerve transfer surgery in the upper extremity,
  • taking tizanidine, dantrolene or diazepam
  • has history of seizures or increased risk for seizures
  • has history of chronic headaches or migraines
  • has history of neurologic diseases, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, etc.
  • has peripheral neuropathy (diabetic polyneuropathy, entrapment neuropathy, etc.)
  • has rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.)
  • has significant medical disease; including uncontrolled systemic hypertension with values above 170/100 mmHg; cardiac or pulmonary disease; uncorrected coagulation abnormalities or need for therapeutic anticoagulation
  • has cardiovascular or musculoskeletal disease or injury that would prevent full participation in physical therapy intervention
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Inanici F, Samejima S, Gad P, Edgerton VR, Hofstetter CP, Moritz CT. Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Jun;26(6):1272-1278. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2834339.

    PMID: 29877852BACKGROUND
  • Inanici F, Brighton LN, Samejima S, Hofstetter CP, Moritz CT. Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Hand and Arm Function After Spinal Cord Injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:310-319. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3049133. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

    PMID: 33400652BACKGROUND
  • McPherson JG, Miller RR, Perlmutter SI. Targeted, activity-dependent spinal stimulation produces long-lasting motor recovery in chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 29;112(39):12193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505383112. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

    PMID: 26371306BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Chet Moritz, Ph.D.

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Fatma Inanici, MD., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Functional measurements and all other assessments will be done by an examiner who does not know the order of the intervention arm.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants who participate in Aim 1 Section of the study will receive open-loop and closed-loop stimulation intervention arms in a randomized order. The order of the two interventions in the Aim 2 Section of the study will be the same for all participants enrolled in the Aim 2 Section of the study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor: Division of Physical Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2021

First Posted

March 7, 2022

Study Start

October 12, 2022

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations