How Effective is the Dose-graded Aerobic Training in Children Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?
Effectiveness of a Dose-graded Aerobic Exercise Regimen on Cardiopulmonary Fitness and Physical Performance in Children Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 12-week dose-graded aerobic exercise program (D-GAE) on cardiopulmonary fitness and physical performance in children survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A total of 58 ALL survivors were randomly assigned to the D-GAE group (n = 29, who underwent a combination of traditional physical rehabilitation and intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training three times per week for 12 weeks) or the control group (n = 29, who underwent only traditional physical rehabilitation). Cardiopulmonary fitness and physical performance were evaluated in both groups before and after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2023
CompletedJanuary 11, 2023
December 1, 2022
1.1 years
December 24, 2022
December 24, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak oxygen uptake
The peak oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) was assessed through a symptom-free exercise tolerance test (i.e., the McMaster cycling protocol).
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Six-minute walk test.
3 months
Timed up and down stairs test
3 months
4x10 meter Shuttle Run test
3 months
Study Arms (2)
D-GAE group
EXPERIMENTALThis group received a 12-week aerobic training in addition to the traditional physical rehabilitation.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group received the traditional physical rehabilitation only
Interventions
The D-GAE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the traditional physical rehabilitation. The D-GAE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The D-GAE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes
The control group received the traditional physical rehabilitation only, 45 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of flexibility exercises, strengthening exercises, balance training, and general conditioning exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Survivors of childhood ALL
- Age of 10-18 years
- Completion of maintenance therapy
- Free of lower limb or spinal deformities
- Not participating in regular exercise regimens in the past six months
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary malignancies
- Significant musculoskeletal/neurological issues
- Neurocognitive impairments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ragab K. Elnaggar
Al Kharj, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ragab K. Elnaggar, PhD
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A single-blind protocol was adopted. The researcher who collected the data was blind to the allocation of treatment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2022
First Posted
January 11, 2023
Study Start
October 3, 2021
Primary Completion
November 24, 2022
Study Completion
November 24, 2022
Last Updated
January 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share