Connective Tissue Graft Versus a Porcine-derived Membrane (Mucoderm) After Immediate Placement
The Influence of a Connective Tissue Graft Versus a Porcine-derived Membrane (Mucoderm) on the Aesthetic Outcome After Immediate Placement and Loading of a Tapered Dental Implant in the Anterior Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Esthetic outcome of immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets remains one of the biggest challenges in implant dentistry. Recently a method to preserve the peri-implant tissues was introduced using provisional restoration, allogenic bone and soft tissue thickening. However, the evidence that this immediate provisialisation with soft tissue grafting using different grafting materials results in constantly high Pink Esthetic scores, especially compared to the delayed loading approach is still lacking. The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the esthetic outcome of immediate temporization of immediately placed and loaded tapered implants in fresh extraction sockets with bone and soft tissue augmentation, using either a connective tissue graft (CTG) or a porcine-derived membrane (Mucoderm) in maxillary anterior sites. The secondary objectives are to investigate the influence of immediate loading on the success rate of tapered implants and crestal bone levels.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2031
ExpectedFebruary 4, 2021
January 1, 2021
2.4 years
January 15, 2021
January 31, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Aesthetic evaluation
Pink esthetic score (PES) according to Fürhauser et al. 2005 Seven variables will be evaluated: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft-tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color and texture. Using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value, the maximum achievable PES is 14. For the PES assessment, frontal photographs will be taken using a digital camera with a flash strobe mounted on a tripod (Canon 350d, 3456×2304 pixel resolution). PES will be assessed at baseline (Final Prosthesis), 3- and 12-month visit.
Change from baseline, 1 year, 5 and 10 years after prosthetic delivery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Recession of gingiva (REC)
Change from baseline, 1 year, 5 and 10 years after prosthetic delivery
Study Arms (2)
Test group
EXPERIMENTALImmediate implant placement and temporization of tapered implants after tooth extraction with buccal augmentation using allogenic bone and porcine-derived membrane.
Control group
EXPERIMENTALImmediate implant placement and temporization of tapered implants after tooth extraction with buccal augmentation using allogenic bone and connective tissue grafting (CTG).
Interventions
1. Atraumatic extraction 2. Palatinal positioning of tapered implant (BLX) 3.75mm diameter 3. 3-4 mm below vestibular gingival line or 1 mm below bone crest 4. Implant placement 5. Allogenic bone packing of the "jumping distance" and soft tissue grafting 6. Connective tissue graft (CTG) or porcine-derived membrane 7. Provisional restoration out of occlusion and mandibular movements 8. X-ray
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females of at least 18 years of age
- implant per patient
- Subject must have voluntarily signed the informed consent before any study related action, are willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits, and agree that the pseudonymized data will be collected and analyzed
- Anterior single teeth (canines and incisors) in both jaws
- Class I extraction socket (intact buccal wall) or Class II (1/3 of buccal wall)
- No recession of gingival contour of tooth to be extracted
- No periodontal bone loss of neighboring anterior teeth
- No implants in neighboring teeth
- Atraumatic extraction of the tooth with intact socket walls remaining
You may not qualify if:
- Deep bite (severe II class)
- Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day)
- Systemic disease (diabetes, osteoporosis)
- Primary stability after implant placement not achieved
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vilniaus Implantologijos Centro (VIC) Klinikalead
- Straumann Groupcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
VIC clinic
Vilnius, 10205, Lithuania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2021
First Posted
February 4, 2021
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 10, 2031
Last Updated
February 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share