Upper Extremity Versus Lower Extremity Accessory Access Sites During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
TAVIXS
Minimally-Invasive Upper Extremity Approach Versus Lower Extremity Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Accessory Access Sites; A Prospective, Multicenter, Investigator-Initiated, Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
238
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The main questions it aims to answer are whether a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach as compared with the standard 'lower extremity' approach:
- Is associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications.
- Is associated with a shorter time to mobilization after TAVI.
- Is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization.
- Has the same early safety outcomes at 30 days post-TAVI. Participants will be subject to the usual care surrounding a TAVI procedure but will also will be asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after TAVI:
- Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH)
- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Researchers will compare the minimally invasive, upper extremity group with the standard lower extremity to see if there are difference regarding the posed questions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2023
CompletedFebruary 12, 2024
February 1, 2024
1 year
January 3, 2023
February 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinically relevant bleeding of the randomized access site; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site, or both
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding; In case a clinically relevant bleeding occurs in both the randomized diagnostic access site and the randomized pacemaker access site, these will be combined and the highest classification of the two BARC bleedings will be scored. BARC classification: a classification scoring bleeding complication based on the clinical actions that follow in which type 1 bleeding is not actionable and type 5 bleeding is fatal.
"Through 30 days"
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Time to mobilization
"during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days - often hours after TAVI procedure"
Total duration of hospitalization
"during index hospitalization, approximately 3 days"
Composite endpoint of all clinically relevant bleeding of the access sites; either diagnostic or pacemaker access site or primary (TAVI) access site
"Through 30 days"
Clinically relevant bleeding not related to the randomized access sites
"Through 30 days"
All-cause mortality
"30 days"
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Frequency rate of cross-over to the non-randomized access site
"Immediately after procedure"
Fluoroscopy time
"Immediately after procedure"
Skin-to-skin time
"Immediately after procedure"
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Minimally invasive, upper extremity
EXPERIMENTALRadial artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the Left Ventricular (LV) stiff wire OR radial artery for pigtail catheter and brachial vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire.
Lower extremity
ACTIVE COMPARATORFemoral artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the LV stiff wire OR femoral artery for pigtail catheter and femoral vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire.
Interventions
Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be \> 18 years old.
- Written informed consent is obtained from all patients.
- Planned for transfemoral TAVI procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to obtain informed consent.
- Contra-indication for brachial or femoral vein access (temporary pacemaker access site).
- Contra-indication for radial or femoral artery access (diagnostic access site).
- Use of a cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) if this requires an additional (arterial) access site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (8)
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Isala Zwolle
Zwolle, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, Stens NA, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Thijssen DHJ, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Extremity Function After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A TAVI XS Sub-Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Jan 13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70470. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41527810DERIVEDVersteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38578.
PMID: 39412806DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niels van Royen, prof. dr.
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor, being the trial statistician, is blinded for the treatment groups. Groups are defined as group A and B during the preparation of the statistical tests. Only after performing the required statistical tests the data will be unblinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2023
First Posted
January 5, 2023
Study Start
November 28, 2022
Primary Completion
December 15, 2023
Study Completion
December 15, 2023
Last Updated
February 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02