Indication of Permanent Cardiac Parcing After Tanscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
TAVISTIM
1 other identifier
interventional
165
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has resulted in a dramatic change in the prognosis of patients with aortic valve stenosis illegible to surgery. However, this intervention may induce heavy conduction disorder due to the proximity of the aortic annulus and the conduction pathways. So far, there is no clear recommandation for clinical management of conduction disorder after TAVI. Standard criterion cannot be applied due to the multiple comorbidity factors observed in these patients. As described in conventional aortic valve surgery, a degree of inflammation and ischemia of the conduction pathways may be involved in the first days. This is the reason underlying the systematic implantation of epicardial electrodes. Such temporary back-up pacing is not possible in TAVI patients. The primary end-point of this study is to confirm that standard criterion for pacing are reliable in post-TAVI conduction disorders and to analyze the contribution of a systematic electrophysiological study (EPS). In TAVI patients, indications for pacing were persistent high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) or bundle branch block appearance associated to HV interval longer than 70ms, 24 hours after the procedure. After a two-month follow-up, clinical and ECG evaluation and 24-hour holter monitoring will be realized in patients without pacemaker and compared to data obtained from the devices in pacemaker-implanted patients (% of ventricular pacing \> 1% ; presence of more than 1 AVB episod).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedDecember 1, 2016
November 1, 2016
1.7 years
August 11, 2014
November 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
to confirm appropriate pacing indication in patients with conduction disorders after TAVI
Pacemaker implantation will be confirmed if there is more than 1% of ventricular pacing or at least one DDD mode switch in the memories. In non-implanted patients, the non-indication for pacing was confirmed in the absence of clinical event and 24-hour Holter ECG recording abnormality.
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Measures electrocardiographic characteristics before and after implantation
2 months
Measures echographic characteristics
2 months
Type of bioprosthesis
2 months
Positioning bioprosthesis
2 months
Diameter of the implanted bioprosthesis and ratio with the surface of the patient's aortic valve
2 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pacemaker
EXPERIMENTALPatient who have been implanted with a pacemaker after TAVI
No Pacemaker
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient who have not been implanted with a pacemaker after TAVI
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient undergoing TAVI through femoral approach
- age \> 50 years
- informed and written consent
- patient with social security system
You may not qualify if:
- patient with previous pacemaker or ICD
- patient under guardianship or curatorship
- patient protected by law
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, 34295, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
THOMANN SARAH, MD
University Hospital, Montpellier France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2014
First Posted
January 13, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11