Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
CROWDIT
1 other identifier
interventional
131
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose is to fill knowledge gaps identified for orthodontic treatment using a novel study design that has not been implemented in the dental field or in orthodontics. The study design comprises an analysis, where outcomes of two techniques are assessed at several efficacy levels by different methods. Moreover, the project is designed to include a longtime follow-up that is unique in orthodontic treatment. The aim is to compare two techniques with buccally fixed appliance in a multicenter RCT of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years with crowding and tooth displacement. In the intervention group, patients will be treated with a self-ligating bracket system, and in the control group with a conventional bracket system. Outcomes will be assessed from the clinical, patients' and economic perspectives as:
- Tooth alignment, function and adverse side effects
- Patients' perception of pain, function and quality of life
- Cost-effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 23, 2022
December 1, 2022
11.7 years
November 24, 2022
December 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluating change in treatment outcomes at the clinical level
The patients will be documented with dental casts at baseline, after 9-12 months treatment and at end of active treatment. To evaluate change in tooth alignment, function stability and treatment success Peer Assessment Rating index (PAR) will be used on dental casts. PAR scores are assigned to different malocclusion traits and the difference between pre- and posttreatment scores indicates the degree of improvement as a result of orthodontic intervention.
2 years
Evaluating longitudinal change in treatment outcomes
The patients will be documented with dental casts end of active treatment and 5 years after active treatment. To evaluate change in stability Peer Assessment Rating index (PAR) will be used on dental casts.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To evaluate the rate of root resorption and marginal bone loss after treatment
2 years
To evaluate caries incidence
2 years
To assess pain experienced by the patients with a validated Visual Analog Scale
2 years
To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Damon self-ligating brackets
ACTIVE COMPARATORA multi-centre two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, comparing/evaluating tooth alignment, function and adverse side effects, Patients' perception of pain, function and quality of life Cost-effectiveness for adolescents with crowding and displaced teeth treated with self-ligating (Damon).
Victory conventional brackets
ACTIVE COMPARATORA multi-centre two-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, comparing/evaluating tooth alignment, function and adverse side effects, Patients' perception of pain, function and quality of life Cost-effectiveness for adolescents with crowding and displaced teeth treated with conventional brackets (Victory).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Skeletal anomalies
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Previous orthodontic treatment
- Impacted teeth
- Ongoing sucking habits
- Previous trauma to teeth or jaws with subjective, clinical, or radiographic signs: periapical pathology; probing depth ≥ 5 mm at ≥ 4 surfaces of central incisors or first molars
- Visible plaque grade 3
- Treatment plan including extractions or other appliances than fixed buccal appliances
- Communication difficulties.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Malmö Universitylead
Related Publications (2)
Matilainen LB, Johansson K, Wiaderny M, Brechter A, Petren S, D'Anto V, Paulsson L. Treatment Effects and Treatment Time in Adolescents With Crowded and Displaced Teeth Treated With Fixed Appliance Systems Without Extractions: A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Dec;28(6):929-942. doi: 10.1111/ocr.70005. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
PMID: 40698883DERIVEDJohansson K, Christell H, Brechter A, Paulsson L. Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption and the Relevance of Intermediate Radiography in Non-Extraction Treatment With Fixed Appliances for Adolescents With Crowding: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Using CBCT. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Jun;28(3):515-526. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12903. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
PMID: 39899339DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Liselotte Paulsson
Malmö University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2022
First Posted
December 23, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share