Treatment Outcome of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Four Premolar Extraction Cases
Evaluation of the Apical Root Resorption in Young Adults Caused by Orthodontic Treatment of Class I Severe Crowding Cases Using Clear Aligners Versus Traditional Fixed Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with severe crowding requiring the extraction of four premolars will be enrolled in this study. The degree of apical root resorption associated with using the clear aligner technique compared with vestibular fixed appliances in the treatment of severe crowding malocclusion cases requiring the extraction of first premolars will be evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes. There are two groups: First group (Experimental): the patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners. Second group (Control): the patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedNovember 19, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.3 years
November 14, 2025
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in root length
The maximum linear lengths between the root apex and incisal edges (for the anterior teeth) or the cusp tips (for the posterior teeth) will be measured on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Differences between the measurements of each tooth before and after treatment provided the amount of apical root resorption in mm. The variable will be measured for each tooth (from the central incisors to the first molars) and on both jaws.
First assessment: one day before the commencement of treatment (i.e., initiating orthodontic tooth movement). Second assessment: one day following the end of treatment (which is expected to occur within 12 to 18 months).
Study Arms (2)
Clear Aligners
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will be treated using clear aligners.
Fixed appliances
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will be treated using ordinary fixed appliances.
Interventions
The ordinary metallic braces will be used in a conventional manner.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18-25 years.
- Class I malocclusion with severe dental crowding.
- Tooth size-arch discrepancy more than 6 mm.
- No congenitally missing or extracted teeth (except for the wisdom teeth).
- No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
- Presence of previously occurred ARR.
- Patients with psychological abnormalities or systemic diseases.
- Patients with known allergies to latex or plastic materials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (4)
Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Alam MK, Al-Ibrahim HM. Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Orthod. 2023 Dec;21(4):100817. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100817. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
PMID: 37837842BACKGROUNDJaber ST, Hajeer MY, Sultan K. Treatment Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Correcting Complicated and Severe Malocclusion Cases Compared to Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 Apr 29;15(4):e38311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38311. eCollection 2023 Apr.
PMID: 37128600BACKGROUNDJaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS. The Effectiveness of In-house Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Achieving Good Occlusion in Complex Orthodontic Cases: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30147. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30147. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 36246088BACKGROUNDJaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Latifeh Y. The Effect of Treatment With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Crowding: A One-Year Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25472. eCollection 2022 May.
PMID: 35663697BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Younis Hajeer
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samer T. Jaber
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 19, 2025
Study Start
November 10, 2019
Primary Completion
February 15, 2021
Study Completion
February 23, 2022
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share